UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

    

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

 

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11


 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

PARKER

HANNIFIN

PROXY

STATEMENT

  LOGO                         

LOGO

ENGINEERING YOUR SUCCESS.      


Parker-Hannifin Corporation is a Fortune 250 global leader in motion and control technologies. For more than a century, the company has engineered the success of its customers in a wide range of diversified industrial and aerospace markets.

The Win Strategy -

The Win Strategy is Parker’s business system that defines the goals and initiatives that drive growth, transformation and success.

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

LOGO

 

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


Our Values -

LOGOOur values shape our culture and our interactions with stakeholders and the communities in which we operate and live.

Winning Culture

We insist on integrity and ethical behavior and we value compassion, respect and inclusion in all aspects of our global business. We seek to raise the quality of life through responsible, global stewardship.

Passionate People

We are empowered – every idea counts and every role has a voice. We are committed to safety and realize the value of our collective efforts. We believe our strength comes from the relationships and trust we establish with each other, our customers, suppliers, distributors and the world we serve.

Valued Customers

We partner with our customers to increase their productivity and profitability, ensuring their success as well as ours. We are committed to serving our customers through innovation, value creation and the highest quality system solutions.

Engaged Leadership

We lead by example, demonstrating our values in all circumstances and at all times. Our character, experience and abilities are the foundation of Parker’s operational excellence. We hold ourselves accountable for achieving the results our stakeholders expect. We listen to and encourage one another, and take pride in our growth and accomplishments.

 

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

Our Purpose -

Our purpose provides inspiration and direction for our team members and highlights how we can have a positive impact on the world.

ENABLING ENGINEERING

BREAKTHROUGHS THAT

LEAD TO A BETTER TOMORROW.


Parker-Hannifin Corporation

6035 Parkland Boulevard—Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio, 44124-4141

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

OF SHAREHOLDERS

OCTOBER 23, 2019

  LOGO

DATE AND TIME

LOGO

ADDRESS

LOGO

RECORD DATE

October 26, 2022 (Wednesday)
9:00 AM EDT

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

6035 Parkland Boulevard
Cleveland Ohio, 44124

September 2, 2022

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:To Our Shareholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Parker-Hannifin Corporation. The meeting will be held at our headquarters located at 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, on Wednesday, October 23, 2019,26, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, for the following purposes:

Voting Items

1.

To elect Lee C. Banks, Robert G. Bohn, Linda S. Harty, Kevin A. Lobo, Candy M. Obourn, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier, James L. Wainscott and Thomas L. Williams as Directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2020;

 

2.

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020;

      
 1   Election of Directors 2 Approval of the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers on a Non-Binding, Advisory Basis 3 Ratify the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
 LOGO   

FOR each director nominee

 

LOGO

 

FOR

 

LOGO

 

FOR

3.

To approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;

4.

To approve the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan;

5.

To consider and vote upon a shareholder proposal to adopt a policy that requires the Chairman of the Board to be an independent member of the Board of Directors; and

6.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on August 30, 2019September 2, 2022 are entitled to vote at the meeting. On September 2, 2022, 128,460,821 shares were outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote. This Proxy Statement and the form of proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about September 23, 2022. Your vote is important, so if you do not expect to attend the meeting, or if you do plan to attend but wish to vote by proxy, please mark, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card promptly in the envelope provided or vote electronically via the internet or by telephone in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. Please refer to the section “How to Attend“General Information About the Annual Meeting of Shareholders” and to the back page of this Proxy StatementMeeting” for directions to attend the Annual Meeting.more information.

Thank you for your support of Parker-Hannifin Corporation.

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

Joseph R. Leonti

Secretary

September 23, 2022

  How to Vote
   LOGO

VOTE VIA INTERNET

www.proxyvote.com

LOGO

VOTE BY

PHONE

800-690-6903

LOGO

VOTE BY MAIL

Vote Processing

c/o Broadridge 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717

    LOGO   

VOTE AT THE MEETING

Parker-Hannifin Corporation 6035 Parkland Boulevard Cleveland Ohio, 44124

By OrderImportant Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the BoardAnnual Meeting of DirectorsShareholders to be held on October 26, 2022.

This Proxy Statement, along with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, is available free of charge on our investor relations website (www.phstock.com).

LOGO
Joseph R. Leonti
Secretary

September 23, 2019

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 23, 2019.

This Proxy Statement, along with our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, is available free of charge on our investor relations website (www.phstock.com).


Table of Contents

 

2022 Proxy Statement1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

3  

    Page    Our Company

Proxy Statement

3  1

Business Highlights and Performance

Governance Documents

4  1

Executive Compensation Highlights

5

Environmental, Social and Governance Highlights

10

Shareholder Engagement Highlights

11Proxy Statement SummarySummary/
Voting Roadmap

12  1LOGO   

Item 1 – Election of Directors

13  4

Director Selection and Nomination, Qualifications

and Diversity

14

Director Skills and Experience

15

Director Biographies

15

Nominees for Election Asas Directors for Terms Expiring

in 20202023

21  4

Director Independence

21

Annual Elections; Majority Voting; No Cumulative Voting

21  10

New Elections and RetirementsDepartures

22  10

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance: Board of Directors

22  11

Board and Committee Structure

22

Current Leadership Structure

23

Board Committees; Committee Charters

24

Meetings and Attendance; Executive Sessions

11

Number; Current Term; Relationships

25
  11

Director Education and Orientation Program

Director Independence

25  11

Board and Committee Evaluations

Current Leadership Structure

26  12

Board Strategic and Risk Oversight

Director Selection and Nomination, Qualifications and Diversity

26  13

Board’s Role in Strategic Oversight

Risk Management

27  15

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Committees of Our Board of Directors

28  16

Spotlight: Oversight of Cybersecurity

Board Committees; Committee Charters

28  16

Spotlight: Succession Planning

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee

28  17

Spotlight: Board’s ESG Oversight

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

30  18

Communications with Directors

The Audit Committee

30  18

Other Governance Matters

30  20

Review and Approval of Transactions with

Related Persons

20

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

31
  20

Proxy Access

21

“Claw-Back” Policy

31
  21

Stock Ownership Guidelines

31  21

Stock Ownership Restrictions - Speculative Transactions / Transactions/Hedging

31  22

Governance Documents

32

Director Compensation

32

Compensation of Directors

33

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022


69  

    Page    

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for
Fiscal Year 20192022

70  62

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of
Control at June 30, 20192022

77  63

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

72

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2019

78
  73LOGO   Item 3 – Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
78

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

79

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

79

Report of the Audit Committee

75

Item  2 – Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

80
  76

Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

Item  3 – Proposal to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers on aNon-Binding, Advisory Basis

80  78

Item  4 – Approval of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

80

Equity Compensation Plan Information

89

Item  5 – Shareholder Proposal to Adopt a Policy that Requires the Chairman of the Board to be an Independent Member of the Board of Directors

91

Principal Shareholders

81  95

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

82

General Information About the

Annual Meeting

83

Other Matters

83

General

85

Shareholders’ Proposals

85  96

Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees

97

Communications with Directors

97

General

98

How to Attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

101

Exhibit A: Parker-Hannifin Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

A-1

 

ii


PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

6035 Parkland Boulevard—Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on October 23, 2019, and at all adjournments thereof. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on August 30, 2019, will be entitled to vote at the meeting. On August 30, 2019, 128,498,788 common shares were outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote. This Proxy Statement and the form of proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about September 23, 2019.

GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

Our Global Code of Business Conduct, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and our Independence Standards for Directors are posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com. Shareholders may request copies of these documents, free of charge, by writing to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling(216) 896-3000. The information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement.

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information relating to our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our corporate governance and executive compensation. Additional details are found throughout this Proxy Statement.

 

2LOGO


    

General Information for 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

OUR COMPANY

Parker-Hannifin Corporation is a Fortune 250 global leader in motion and control technologies. For more than a century, the company has engineered the success of its customers in a wide range of diversified industrial and aerospace markets.

The following sections provide highlights from our fiscal year 2022 across matters of importance to our shareholders, including business and financial performance, executive compensation, our environment, social and governance (“ESG”) program and shareholder engagement.

Business Highlights and Performance

Fiscal year 2022 was a year marked by significant macroeconomic headwinds, including inflation, supply chain constraints, international conflict and ongoing COVID-19 challenges. Nonetheless, The Win Strategy drove sustained profitable growth and strong financial performance as compared to our diversified industrial proxy peers. The actions taken under The Win Strategy to strengthen our portfolio and improve our performance have built a business that we believe is better equipped than ever before to be resilient across macroeconomic cycles. Our Purpose Statement: Enabling Engineering Breakthroughs that Lead to a Better Tomorrow continued to provide inspiration and direction for our team members, and represents how we can strengthen our communities and have a positive impact on the world.

In fiscal year 2022, we delivered strong financial performance and value for our shareholders, including:

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Sales            

Cash Flow from      

Operations

Continued Dividend Increase    

Meggitt

TimeAcquisition    

 $15.86B

  TOTAL NET SALES
  WERE A RECORD AT

  $15.86 BILLION

$2.44B

CASH FLOW FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
(CFOA) WAS 15.4% OF SALES
AT $2.44 BILLION

66th YEAR

INCREASED ANNUAL
DIVIDEND PER SHARE
FOR THE 66TH YEAR
IN A ROW

ANNOUNCED
ACQUISITION OF
MEGGITT PLC (WHICH
WAS COMPLETED ON
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022)

2022 Proxy Statement3


Our Company

Executive Compensation Highlights

The tables below highlight the performance-based nature of our compensation program and how our program aligns with what we view as executive compensation best practices.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Elements of CompensationPurpose
 FixedBase SalaryAttracts, retains and Date

motivates the highly-talented and values-driven individuals we need to advance the goals of The Win Strategy
Annual Cash IncentiveRONA Bonuses (General and Converted)Incentivizes executive officers to maximize return on net assets (“RONA”) by focusing on various key business strategies, such as value pricing and strategic supply chain, market-driven innovation, system solutions and strong distribution channels
  

 

    October 23, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. EDT

Place

Target Incentive BonusesIncentivizes executive officers to maximize free cash flow by focusing on various key business strategies, such as continuous improvement in net income, lean initiatives, inventory controls, collection of receivables, control of payables and capital expenditures, and the ability to finance dividends, acquisitions and product innovations
  

 

    Parker-Hannifin Corporation

    6035 Parkland Boulevard

    Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141

 Variable/

Record Date At-Risk

Profitable Growth Incentive Plan*Incentivizes executive officers to maximize sales growth (organic and through acquisitions) by focusing on various key business strategies, such as profitable and sustainable sales growth
  

 

Long-

Term Equity Incentive

Long Term Incentive Performance (“LTIP”) AwardsIncentivizes executive officers to maximize long-term sales growth, earnings per share (“EPS”) growth, and growth in average return on invested capital (“ROIC”) by focusing on various key business strategies, such as market-driven innovation, on-time delivery of quality products, value-added services and systems, strategic supply chain, lean enterprise, value pricing and profitable growth

 August 30, 2019

    

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

Voting Matters

Stock Incentives/ Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)
  Incentivizes executive officers to maximize our stock price by focusing on various key business strategies, such as sustained profitable growth and financial and operational performance that contribute to appreciation of our stock price

 

Board Recommendations

Election of Directors

*

FOR ALL NOMINEES

Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor

FOR

Advisory VoteOfficer participation in our Profitable Growth Incentive Plan is limited to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

FOR

Approval of the Amended and Restated Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

FOR

Shareholder Proposal to Adopt a Policy that Requires the Chairman of the Board to be an Independent Member of the Board of Directors

AGAINSTour operating group presidents.

We are pleased to provide the following key governance, sustainability and compensation highlights for fiscal year 2019. We believe these measures will better position us to continue to drive employee engagement, premier customer experience, profitable growth and financial performance and otherwise compete and win as a leading worldwide diversified manufacturer of motion and control technologies and systems. In considering our governance and compensation programs for fiscal year 2019, we utilized insights drawn from engagement with our shareholders and the results of our shareholder votes.

Our Board of Directors is committed to sound corporate governance and sustainability practices, promoting the long-term interests of our shareholders and holding itself and management accountable for our performance. The following table summarizes some of the key elements of our corporate governance framework.Executive Compensation Practices

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

 LOGO   What We Do    Annual election ofall Directors

    

 LOGO   What We Don’t Do    Separate Chairman of the Board and independent Lead Director roles

LOGO  Executive compensation program with pay-for-performance structure aligned with The Win Strategy

    Published Corporate Governance

LOGO  The target total direct compensation package for our Chief Executive Officer is a mix of 9% fixed and 91% at-risk, and for our other Named Executive Officers is an average mix of 18% fixed and 82% at-risk

LOGO  Annual advisory vote on executive compensation with consistent high degree of approval

LOGO  One-year minimum vesting or performance period requirements for equity incentives under our Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan “

LOGO  Claw back” policy to recover or withhold incentive-based compensation to executive officers in certain circumstances

LOGO  Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy for Directors and executive officers

LOGO  Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines for executive officers and Directors

   

LOGO   Offer employment agreements to our executives

LOGO   Offer above-market earnings on contributions to deferred compensation accounts

LOGO   Grant stock options or SARs with an exercise price less than the fair market value of Parker’s common stock on the date of grant

LOGO   Re-price stock options or SARs

LOGO   Cash out underwater stock options or SARs

LOGO   Include reload provisions in any stock option or SAR grant

LOGO   Permit directors or employees, or their respective related persons, to engage in short sales of Parker’s stock or to trade in instruments designed to hedge against price declines in Parker’s stock

LOGO   Permit directors or officers to hold Parker securities in margin accounts or to pledge Parker securities as collateral for loans or other obligations

4LOGO


Our Company

Environment, Social and Governance Highlights

Our ESG program includes a range of initiatives around corporate social responsibility and sustainability, taking into account the interests of our key stakeholders, including our shareholders, team members, customers and communities. Issues that we focus on include, among others, workplace health and safety, climate risk, water conservation, human capital management, diversity, equity and inclusion, cyber security, and business ethics and compliance. For information on Board and Committee ESG oversight responsibilities, see “Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” on page 27 of this Proxy Statement.

We publish our Sustainability Report in line with Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards, addressing the many ways in which we apply our core technologies to make a positive impact on the world, including through our team members, social responsibility, environmental initiatives, product stewardship, and governance, ethics and compliance. Selected aspects of our most recent Sustainability Report are highlighted below.

We are proud of our corporate social responsibility and sustainability accomplishments, but recognize that best practices in ESG integration and reporting frameworks continue to evolve. While there is more work to be done, we are confident in our strategy of achieving business success through social responsibility and sustainable business practices:

Environment

   Environmental    Stewardship

We are committed to driving sustainable, long-term growth and doing so in a way that makes the world a better place.

 

   Published Global CodeWe are committing to achieve carbon neutral operations by 2040. To ensure continued progress in minimizing our carbon footprint, we established a series of emissions targets, which include:

   Reducing absolute emissions directly from our operations by 50% by 2030; and

   Reducing indirect absolute emissions related to materials sourcing, logistics and services by 15% by 2030, and by 25% by 2040.

   We have reported energy and emissions data to the Carbon Disclosure Project (“CDP”) since 2008.

   Water

   Conservation

   We recognize that water is becoming a critical resource and is in short supply in certain parts of the world. As a result, Parker has launched a new water conservation initiative that targets high risk and high volume facilities.

   Our goal is to implement water management best practices at 100% of sites in water-scarce locations by 2030 based on the definition by the World Resources Institute.

   Waste and Materials

   Management

   We manage materials and waste responsibly and in accordance with applicable laws in the communities in which we operate. We have steadily reduced our hazardous waste production through the years and we have systematically upgraded our hazardous materials storage to minimize potential for releases to the environment.

   Our Simple by Design innovation methods as well as our focus on kaizen process improvements promote the reduction of waste in all aspects of our manufacturing process.

2022 Proxy Statement5


Our Company

   Supplier

   Partnerships

   We recently implemented several supply chain initiatives to reduce our environmental footprint. This includes leveraging sustainable transport methods to reduce emissions associated with air freight, as well as transitioning to electronic documentation to reduce paper waste. Through kaizen initiatives, our team members continue to develop innovations to help achieve our environmental stewardship goals.

   Since 2013, we have been a member of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency SmartWay® Transport Partnership aimed at identifying technologies and strategies to reduce carbon emissions and set goals and track progress towards reducing fuel consumption and improve the efficiency of freight transport.

   Our global supply chain team employs dual sourcing and other risk management strategies to ensure the availability of materials needed for production. We also require our suppliers to comply with all laws and regulations related to human rights, resource conservation and other environmental and legal requirements.

   Technologies

   Enabling a Better

   Tomorrow

   Our interconnected portfolio of technologies features a broad range of highly efficient solutions engineered to improve performance and efficiency and to help end users reduce resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

   We deliver components and systems that enable the adoption of cleaner and more efficient energy, electrification, light weighting and other innovations to provide a more positive, global environmental impact to companies across the industrial, mobile and aerospace markets, including:

   A comprehensive suite of engineered materials such as thermal management, coatings, adhesives and vibration control that enable more electric applications.

   A broad range of motion and control technologies to support the use of various clean energy sources such as batteries, fuel cells, hydrogen, sustainable fuels and renewable energy.

   A strong motion technology offering with electro-hydraulic, electromechanical, and pneumatic actuators, valves, pumps, motors, controllers, software and conveyance for more electric aerospace, mobile and industrial applications.

   A broad platform of filtration technologies to accelerate a cleaner and more sustainable world.

6LOGO


Our Company

Social

   SafetySafety is a core value that all team members share, and our goal is to achieve a zero-incident workplace. To measure our safety progress, we have established long-term safety targets. Our goals is to have zero recordable incidents by 2030. We have reduced our Recordable Incident Rate by 72% from 2015 through 2022 and our Lost Time Incident Rate by 44% in the same time period.

   Diversity, Equity

   and Inclusion

An inclusive environment is a core tenet of our values and one of our key measures of success within The Win Strategy. In 2020, we appointed our first Vice President of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) to lead an ongoing commitment to an inclusive and welcoming workplace. We also established four global Diversity, Equity and Inclusion High Performance Teams (“HPTs”) focused on Talent Attraction, Talent Development, Governance and Knowledge. Each team is led by a senior executive and tasked with improving the way we attract and develop diverse team members, design education and awareness opportunities, and define sustainable progress measures in fostering an inclusive culture.

A component of our DEI program focus is to support the development and deployment of Business Conduct applicableResource Groups (“BRGs”). Our first BRG, Peer W, was established in 2015 to support the attraction, development and retention of women at Parker. Peer W has grown into a well-developed global network of 24 local chapters and established a Mentoring Circles program in 2020. In 2021, we introduced and launched two additional BRGs which are the Nia Network, supporting the attraction, development and retention of Black team members, and Parker Next, dedicated to our team members’ professional growth and personal development.

Our focus on DEI is to promote a strong, cohesive work environment that will provide us the best talent and further strengthen our organization for future success. Maintaining a strong DEI program starts with our leadership and is reflected in our CEO’s statement on diversity, equity and inclusion: Continually Build Upon the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion of Our Global Team to be Reflective of the Communities in Which We Do Business.

   Social

   Responsibility

Our social responsibility strategy, with the support of the Parker-Hannifin Foundation, empowers team members to make a difference in the communities we call home. The Parker Foundation has three areas of focus:

   STEM EDUCATION: Supporting schools, universities and community agencies to promote access to science, technology, engineering and mathematics education, and the resources and support needed to thrive in the classroom.

   COMMUNITY NEEDS: Supporting our team members, families and neighbors by contributing to the advancement and well-being of our communities.

   SUSTAINABILITY: Supporting long-term efforts to build sustainable communities, address key societal issues and create a better tomorrow.

For nearly 70 years, the Parker-Hannifin Foundation has extended the goodwill of our team members with donations that benefit the communities where we operate. Through our Parker Foundation programs, we have donated over $70 million since 2010, including $7 million in 2022.

2022 Proxy Statement7


Our Company

Governance

   Board Diversity

   and Composition

Our Board of Directors is committed to sound corporate governance practices, promoting the long-term interests of our shareholders and holding itself and management accountable for our performance.

The metrics included in the graphic below reflect the Board structure and composition of our twelve current Directors. Each Director brings his or her own unique background and range of expertise, knowledge and experience, which we believe provides an optimal and diverse mix of skills and qualifications necessary for our Board to effectively fulfill its oversight responsibilities.

LOGO

8LOGO


Our Company

   Board and

   Committee    Majority voting and resignation policy for uncontested Director elections

   Practices

   

   Modified our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Human Resources and Compensation Committees to expressly identify the specific areas of ESG oversight responsibility of the full Board Committees are 100% comprised of independent Directorsand each Committee.

 

    Average age of our Director nominees is 61

    Our Amended and Restated Regulations permit proxy access for eligible shareholders

   Director retirement is mandatory (with no exceptions or conditions) after reaching age 72

 

   Robust stock ownership guidelines for our Directors and executive officers (all of whom are compliant with such guidelines)

 

   Annual Board, Committee and individual Director evaluations

   Annual review of our Chief Executive Officer by all independent Directors

   None of our Directors are “overboarded” – three do not sit on any other public company boards, seven sit on one other public company board, one sits on two other public company boards, and one sits on three other public company boards

   Each of our Directors attended more than 94% of his or her meetings of our Board of Directors and his or her Committee meetings during fiscal year 2022

   Each Committee of our Board of Directors has a published charter that is reviewed and evaluated at least annually

   Shareholder Rights     

   Annual election of all Directors

 

   The Board of Directors includes three womenMajority voting and resignation policy for uncontested Director elections

   Proxy access permitted for eligible shareholders

   Board

   Independence    No shareholder rights plan

   

   Board Committees are 100% comprised of independent Directors

 

   Annual Board, CommitteeIndependent Directors meet regularly and individual Director evaluationsfrequently (at least four times per year) without management

    Each   Oversight of our Director nominees attended between 89% – 100% of his or her meetings of our Board of Directors and his or her Committee meetings during fiscal year 2019

Risk
   

    Annual reviews of our Chief Executive Officer by all independent Directors

    None of our Director nominees are “overboarded” – five do not sit on any other public company board of Directors, four sit on just one other public company Board of Directors and two sit on just two other public company Boards of Directors

    64% of our Director nominees have a tenure of under 10 years. Tenure of this year’s Director nominees:

0-5 years: 36.5%

6-9 years: 27.0%

³10 years: 36.5%

   Our Chairman of the Board and Lead Director ensure the entire Board of Directors maintains regular oversight of key risk areas, such as corporate strategy, management succession planning, cyber security, enterprise risk management, and environmental, socialESG matters. For more information on the Board’s oversight responsibilities, see pages 26-29 of this Proxy Statement.

   Guidelines and governance matters

   Codes of Conduct

 

   Published Global Code of Business Conduct applicable to our Board of Directors

   Published Corporate Governance Guidelines

2022 Proxy Statement9


Our Company

Shareholder Engagement Highlights

We actively seek and highly value feedback from our shareholders. During fiscal year 2022, in addition to our traditional investor relations outreach efforts, we proactively reached out to shareholders representing over 51% of our outstanding common stock to engage with them on ESG matters. We engaged with each shareholder that accepted our invitation.

  We Sought Input from Shareholders
  Representing
Company RepresentativesTopics DiscussedFeedback/Actions Informed by
Feedback

  LOGO

  

 

   Independent Directors meet regularly General Counsel
and frequently (at least four times per year) withoutSecretary

   Investor Relations

   Other members of Senior Management, including our Environmental, Health and
Safety (“EHS”) leader

Governance Topics

   Our commitment to performance- based executive compensation

   Board refreshment and diversity

   Board composition &
leadership structure

   Board risk oversight

   COVID-19 response

Sustainability Topics

   Environmental / Climate goals
and strategies

   Environmental reporting frameworks

   Human capital management presentmatters, including labor
market challenges

 

   OurSupportive of recent director refreshment efforts

   Positive feedback on our climate commitments and reporting frameworks

   Published additional EEO-1 workforce data in our Sustainability Report is published annually, addressing the many ways in which we apply our core technologies to make a positive impact on the world, including through social responsibility, our people, our environmental initiatives, product stewardship, and governance, ethics and compliance. The Report is available on our website at www.phstock.com.

We also shared the feedback received during these meetings with our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee and our full Board of Directors. As a result of our shareholder engagement efforts and the feedback we received, we strengthened our disclosures in this Proxy Statement and our Sustainability Report.

10LOGO


The following table

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY/

VOTING ROADMAP

This summary highlights somecertain information relating to the voting items for our 2022 Annual Meeting of the key aspects of our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2019. This table is not a substitute for, nor does it purport to include, all of the information provided in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the Compensation Tables presented later inShareholders. Additional details are found throughout this Proxy Statement.

 

Executive Compensation Highlights

 

    Executive compensation program withpay-for-performance structure aligned with The Win StrategyTM

 

 

Item 1 – Election of Directors

Shareholder approval is sought to elect the following directors for a term that will expire at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2023:

   The target compensation package for our Chief Executive Officer is a mix of 10% fixed and 90% at risk, and for our other Named Executive Officers is an average mix of 18% fixed and 82% at riskLee C. Banks

   Linda A. Harty

   Joseph Scaminace

   James R. Verrier

   Jillian C. Evanko

   William F. Lacey

   Åke Svensson

   James L. Wainscott

   Lance M. Fritz

   Kevin A. Lobo

   Laura K. Thompson

   Thomas L. Williams

 

    Annual advisory vote on executive compensation with consistent high degree of approval

 

LOGO   

 

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote     One-year“FOR” minimum vesting or performance period requirements each of the nominees to the Board of Directors.

See page 12 for restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, unrestricted stock awards, grantsdetails

Item 2 – Proposal to Approve the Compensation of stock options, and stock appreciation rights, under our 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan
Named Executive Officers on a Non-Binding, Advisory Basis

 

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related SEC rules, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We encourage our shareholders to carefully read this Proxy Statement in its entirety before deciding whether or not to vote for or against this Item 2.

 

    Claw-back policy to recover or withhold incentive-based compensation to executive officers in certain circumstances

 

LOGO   

 

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement on a non-binding, Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy advisory basis.

See page 34 for Directors and executive officersdetails

 

Item 3 – Ratification of the Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee recommends ratification of its appointment of Deloitte and Touche LLP (“D&T”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. D&T served as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, and has served as our independent auditor since fiscal year 2008.

LOGO   

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of D&T as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.

See page 78 for details

2022 Proxy Statement11


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Shareholder approval is sought to elect Lee C. Banks, Robert G. Bohn,Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz, Linda S.A. Harty, William F. Lacey, Kevin A. Lobo, Candy M. Obourn, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier, James L. Wainscott and Thomas L. Williams as Directors for a term that will expire at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2020.2023.

Our Board of Directors has concluded that the nominees presented in this “Item 1—Election of Directors” collectively represent a highly-qualified and diverse group of individuals who will effectively serve the long-term interests of our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders. Our Board of Directors believes that each nominee should serve on our Board for the coming year based on his or her record of effective past service on our Board and the specific experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills described in his or her biographical information presented in this “Item 1—Election of Directors” section.

Should any nominee become unable to accept nomination or election, the proxies will be voted for the election of another person as our Board of Directors may recommend. However, our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that this circumstance will occur.

Board Nominees

    Committee Membership    
  NamePrincipal Employment    Director Since       HRC      CGN      AC   

Lee C. Banks

Vice Chairman and President of

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

2015

Jillian C. Evanko

President and Chief Executive Officer of

Chart Industries, Inc.

2021LOGO

LOGO

Lance M. Fritz

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific Corporation2021LOGOLOGO

Linda A. Harty

Former Treasurer of Medtronic plc2007

LOGOLOGO

William F. Lacey

Vice President of Finance (Books, Kindle and Digital Content) of Amazon2021

LOGOLOGO

Kevin A. Lobo

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of

Stryker Corporation

2013LOGO

LOGO

Joseph Scaminace    

Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of OM

Group, Inc.

2004LOGOLOGO

Åke Svensson

Chairman of Swedavia AB2010

LOGOLOGO

Laura K. Thompson

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company2019

LOGOLOGO

James R. Verrier

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of

BorgWarner, Inc.

2016LOGO

LOGO

James L. Wainscott

(Lead Director)

Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of AK Steel Holding Corporation2009LOGOLOGO

Thomas L. Williams

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

2015

  AC Audit Committee

LOGO

Member

HRC Human Resource and Compensation Committee

LOGOChair

CGN Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

      LOGO   

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

12LOGO


Item 1 – Election of Directors

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2020Director Selection and Nomination, Qualifications

and Diversity

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of our Board is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending potential Director candidates. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee ensures that Director recruiting, succession and refreshment are persistent areas of focus and regularly reviews the size, composition and independence of our Board, and any expected vacancies, in determining whether and to what extent to actively recruit new Directors or to replace departing Directors.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee utilizes a variety of methods and processes to identify potential Director candidates, including through reputable third-party search firms, unsolicited recommendations from other third-party search firms, and referrals from current or past members of our Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will give appropriate consideration to qualified persons recommended by shareholders for nomination as Directors (provided that such recommendations comply with the procedures set forth under the caption “Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees”) and will consider such candidates on the same basis as candidates recommended by other sources.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee generally will not, however, consider recommendations for Director nominees submitted by individuals who are not affiliated with us. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has developed and implemented a robust process to ensure that its formal Director searches are appropriately scoped and designed to produce a slate of potential candidates representing a broad range of backgrounds, educations, experiences, skills and viewpoints that will enable them, individually and collectively, to address the issues affecting our Board, our business, our team members and our shareholders, and optimize the functioning and decision-making and oversight roles of our Board and its Committees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee currently focuses on the following key search and evaluation criteria, but considers the entirety of each proposed candidate’s credentials and all available information that may be relevant to each candidate’s nomination.

 

  Key CriteriaOverall Philosophy and Approach

LOGO

Director since 2015Culture and Values

  

LEE C. BANKS

Age: 56

Committees:  None

Mr. Banks has beenThe Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee places high value on cultural fit. Our Directors must be able to work together to efficiently and effectively oversee the issues and risks facing our Presidentbusiness, and Chief Operating Officer since February 2015. He washave the commitment, integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism required under our Executive Vice President from August 2008Corporate Governance Guidelines and Global Code of Business Conduct, and to February 2015 and our Operating Officer from November 2006 to February 2015. Mr. Banks is also a Directorotherwise serve the long-term interests of Nordson Corporation.

Our Board of Directors believes that Mr. Banks will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders basedshareholders.

Diversity

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee firmly believes diversity is critical to a well-functioning Board of Directors, and is committed to enhancing diversity on his significantour Board. As a result, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require each search for qualified director candidates to include individuals with diverse backgrounds, including gender, ethnicity and race. In our most recently completed Director search in 2021, for example, a majority of the candidates presented for consideration were diverse experiences,candidates which ultimately resulted in the elections of Ms. Evanko, Mr. Fritz and Mr. Lacey, strengthening the gender and racial diversity of our Board.

Skills and Qualifications

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also believes it is essential to have a Board with the range of skills qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:experience needed to effectively evaluate, monitor and oversee the wide range of considerations presented by the size and scope of our Company, operations, products and markets. As a result, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to identify nominees who are independent and well equipped with a broad set of key skills, including those shown on the table on page 14.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, utilizing its robust and thoughtful approach to Director recruiting, succession and refreshment, has built an experienced, diverse and independent Board that provides significant oversight over our plans and strategies for growth, financial performance and shareholder value creation.

 2019 

 

•  extensive service as President and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President and Operating Officer and in various operational leadership positions during his    Laura K. Thompson

LOGO   

28-year 2021  career with us;

 

•  intimate, working knowledge of ourJillian C. Evanko

Lance M. Fritz

William F. Lacey

day-to-day4 business, plans, strategies and initiatives;

new directors since 2019

 

3

•  present service on another public company board;new diverse directors since 2019

 

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

 

•  high level of commitment to our Board, our business, our employees and our shareholders, and a high level of integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2010

2022 Proxy Statement
 

ROBERT G. BOHN

Age: 66

Committees:  Audit Committee

           Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Now retired, Mr. Bohn was Chairman of the Board of Oshkosh Corporation (specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies manufacturing) from January 2000 to February 2011. Mr. Bohn is also a Director of Carlisle Companies, Inc. and The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Our Board believes that Mr. Bohn will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Oshkosh Corporation, a successful global industrial company of significant size;

•  past and present service on other public company boards;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2007

LINDA S. HARTY

Age: 59

Committees:  Audit Committee (Chair)

           Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Now retired, Ms. Harty was Treasurer of Medtronic plc (medical technology) from February 2010 to April 2017. Ms. Harty is also a Director of Wabtec Corporation and Syneos Health, Inc.

Our Board believes that Ms. Harty will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on her significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service in senior finance and accounting leadership positions at Medtronic plc and other successful global companies of significant size;

•  present service on other public company boards;

•  qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

13


Item 1 – Election of Directors

Director Skills and Experience

In addition to the metrics included on page 8, the following table presents on an individual basis the skills and experience of our Board in areas that are of importance to our Company. Our Board refreshment efforts over the last several years have strengthened the culture, skills and diversity of our Board. Each Director nominee brings his or her own unique background and range of expertise, knowledge and experience which provides a comprehensive and optimal mix of skills and qualifications necessary for our Board to effectively fulfill its oversight responsibilities.

 

LOGO     Director Experience

Director since 2013

 

KEVIN A. LOBO

Age: 54

Committees:  Audit Committee

          Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Mr. Lobo has been Chairman of the Board of Stryker Corporation (medical technology) since July 2014 and has been Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director since October 2012.

Our Board believes that Mr. Lobo will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service in senior leadership positions at Stryker Corporation and other successful global companies of significant size;

•  present service on another public company board;

•  qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO   
LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   

LOGO

Director since 2002LOGO

 

Public Company CEO, COO, CFO,

CANDY M. OBOURNor Other Senior Leadership

Age: 69

Committees:  Human Resources and Compensation Committee (Chair)

           Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

●  ●  ●  

 

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

Ms. Obourn has been Chairman of Isoflux Incorporated (coating technologies) since April 2012.LOGO

Sales & Marketing

●  ●  ●  

 

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

Our Board believes that Ms. Obourn will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on her significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:LOGO

Manufacturing

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

LOGO

Technology/Digital

●  ●  ●  

 

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

•  service as Chief Executive Officer and President of a coating technologies company, Chief Executive Officer and President of a health care products company and in senior leadership positions at other global companies of significant size;LOGO

Corporate Strategy

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

LOGO

Industrial &/or

Aerospace Industry

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

 

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;LOGO

International

●  ●  

 

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; andLOGO

Finance & Accounting

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

LOGO

Risk Management

●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  ●  

 

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2004

 

JOSEPH SCAMINACE

Age: 66

Committees:  Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

           Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Mr. Scaminace was a Director and Chief Executive Officer of OM Group, Inc. (metal-based specialty chemicals) from June 2005 to October 2015 and Chairman of the Board of OM Group from August 2005 to October 2015. Mr. Scaminace is also Lead Director of Cintas Corporation.

Our Board believes that Mr. Scaminace will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of OM Group, Inc., and prior leadership positions at other global industrial companies of significant size;

•  past and present service on other public company boards;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2010

ÅKE SVENSSON

Age: 67

Committees:  Audit Committee

           Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Mr. Svensson has been Chairman of the Association of Swedish Engineering Industries, and Board Member of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise since May 2018, and Chairman of Swedavia AB (transport infrastructure) since April 2016. He was previously Director General of Swedish Engineering Industries from September 2010 to August 2016. Mr. Svensson serves on the Board of Business Sweden (export support organization), and was formerly a director of Saab AB.

Our Board believes that Mr. Svensson will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and President of Saab AB, a successful European aerospace, defense and security company of significant size;

•  extensive knowledge of European aerospace, defense and security businesses and related issues and trends;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

14LOGO


Item 1 – Election of Directors

Director Biographies

Nominees for Election as Directors for Terms Expiring in 2023

Lee C. Banks

LOGO

 

LOGODirector Since: 2015

Age: 59

Committees: None

  

LAURA K. THOMPSON

Other Public Company Directorships:

   Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec)
(since 2020)

   Nordson Corporation (former) (2010-2020)

Mr. Banks has been our Vice Chairman and President since August 2021. From February 2015 to August 2021 he was President and Chief Operating Officer. He was our Executive Vice President from August 2008 to February 2015 and our Operating Officer from November 2006 to February 2015.

Our Board believes that Mr. Banks will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as Vice Chairman and President, President and Chief Operating Officer, and in various other senior leadership positions during his over 30-year career with us;

intimate working knowledge of our day-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives;

service on other public company boards;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors, our business, our team members, and our shareholders and a high level of integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

Jillian C. Evanko

LOGO

Director Since: 2021

Age: 5544

Committees: Subject toAudit

Human Resources and effective upon her election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:Compensation

Audit CommitteeOther Public Company Directorships:

   Chart Industries, Inc. (since 2018)

   Alliant Energy Corporation (former) (2019-2021)

Ms. Evanko has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Chart Industries, Inc. (cryogenic technologies) since June 2018. She was the Chief Financial Officer of Chart from March 2017 until January 2019. Prior to Chart, Ms. Evanko served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Truck-Lite Co., LLC (truck and commercial vehicle products) since October 2016. Prior to Truck-Lite, Ms. Evanko was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dover Corporation’s Dover Fluids (diversified global manufacturer) since January 2014.

Our Board believes that Ms. Evanko will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on her significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chart Industries, Inc., and other leadership positions at successful global companies of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

2022 Proxy Statement15


Item 1 – Election of Directors

Lance M. Fritz

LOGO

Director Since: 2021

Age: 59

Committees: Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

 

Human Resources and Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships:

   Union Pacific Corporation (since 2015)

Mr. Fritz has been Chairman of the Board of Union Pacific Corporation (rail transport) since October 2015, and President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2015.

Our Board believes that Mr. Fritz will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific Corporation and other leadership positions at successful global companies of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

Linda A. Harty

LOGO

Director Since: 2007

Age: 62

Committees: Audit (Chair)

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Other Public Company Directorships:

   Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec) (since 2016)

   Syneos Health, Inc. (since 2017)

   Chart Industries, Inc. (since 2021)

Now retired, Ms. Harty was Treasurer of Medtronic plc (medical technology) from February 2010 to April 2017.

Our Board believes that Ms. Harty will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on her significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service in senior finance and accounting leadership positions at Medtronic plc and other successful global companies of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

former Certified Public accountant (CPA) and qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

16LOGO


Item 1 – Election of Directors

William F. Lacey

LOGO

Director Since: 2021

Age: 52

Committees: Audit

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Other Public Company Directorships:

   None

Mr. Lacey has been Vice President of Finance (Books, Kindle and Digital Content) of Amazon (e-commerce) since February 2022. He previously was Chief Executive Officer of GE Lighting (lighting technology), a Savant company, from 2015 to February 2022; and served as Chief Financial Officer of GE Home and Business Solutions Lighting from 2011 to 2015.

Our Board believes that Mr. Lacey will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Lighting and in senior finance and accounting leadership positions at Amazon and General Electric, successful global companies of significant size;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

Kevin A. Lobo

LOGO

Director Since: 2013

Age: 57

Committees: Audit

Human Resources and Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships:

   Stryker Corporation (since 2012)

Mr. Lobo has been Chairman of the Board of Stryker Corporation (medical technologies) since July 2014 and has been Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director since October 2012.

Our Board believes that Mr. Lobo will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service in senior leadership positions at Stryker Corporation and other successful global companies of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

2022 Proxy Statement17


Item 1 – Election of Directors

Joseph Scaminace

LOGO

Director Since: 2004

Age: 69

Committees: Human Resources and Compensation (Chair)

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Other Public Company Directorships:

   Cintas Corporation (since 2010) (Lead Director)

Now retired, Mr. Scaminace served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of OM Group, Inc. (metal-based specialty chemicals) from June 2005 to October 2015 and Chairman of the Board of OM Group from August 2005 to October 2015.

Our Board believes that Mr. Scaminace will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of OM Group, Inc., and prior leadership positions at other successful global companies of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

Åke Svensson

LOGO

Director Since: 2010

Age: 70

Committees: Audit

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Other Public Company Directorships:

   None

Mr. Svensson is Chairman of Swedavia AB (transport infrastructure). He was Chairman of the Association of Swedish Engineering Industries (manufacturing trade organization), and Board Member of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprises from May 2018 until May 2020. He was previously Director General of Swedish Engineering Industries from September 2010 to August 2016. Mr. Svensson is a former Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Saab AB.

Our Board believes that Mr. Svensson will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service and leadership positions with Saab AB, a successful European aerospace, defense and security company of significant size;

extensive knowledge of European aerospace, defense and security businesses and related issues and trends;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

18LOGO


Item 1 – Election of Directors

Laura K. Thompson

LOGO

Director Since: 2019

Age: 58

Committees: Audit

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Other Public Company Directorships:

   Wesco International (since 2019)

   Titan International, Inc. (since 2021)

Now retired, Ms. Thompson served as Executive Vice President of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (tire manufacturing) from December 2013 until her retirement in March 2019, and Chief Financial Officer of Goodyear from December 2013 until October 2018.

Our Board believes that Ms. Thompson will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on her significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and in other key leadership positions at The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, a successful global company of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

James R. Verrier

LOGO

Director Since: 2016

Age: 59

Committees: Audit

Human Resources and Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships:

   BorgWarner, Inc. (former) (2013-2018)

Now retired, Mr. Verrier served as a Board Advisor to BorgWarner, Inc. (powertrain solutions) from August 1, 2018 until his retirement on February 28, 2019. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and director of BorgWarner, Inc. from January 2013 until July 31, 2018, and President of BorgWarner from March 2012 until July 31, 2018.

Our Board believes that Mr. Verrier will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

service as a director, Chief Executive Officer and President of BorgWarner, Inc., a successful global company of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

2022 Proxy Statement19


Item 1 – Election of Directors

James L. Wainscott

LOGO

Director Since: 2009

Age: 65

Committees: Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair and Lead Director)

Human Resources and Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships:

   CSX Corporation (since 2020)

Now retired, Mr. Wainscott was Chairman of the Board of AK Steel Holding Corporation (steel producer) from January 2006 to May 2016; and President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of AK Steel Holding Corporation from October 2003 to January 2016.

Our Board believes that Mr. Wainscott will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AK Steel Holding Corporation, a successful global company of significant size;

service on other public company boards;

independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

proven ability to effectively serve as our Lead Director and to otherwise work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

Thomas L. Williams

LOGO

Director Since: 2015

Age: 63

Committees: None

Other Public Company Directorships:

   The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (tire manufacturing) from December 2013 until her retirement in March 2019, and Chief Financial Officer of Goodyear from December 2013 until October 2018.

Director since 2019

Our Board believes that Ms. Thompson will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on her significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:(since 2019)

 

  extensive service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and in other key leadership positions at The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, a manufacturing company of significant size;   Chart Industries, Inc. (former) (2008-2019)

Mr. Williams has been our Chairman of the Board since January 2016, and our Chief Executive Officer since February 2015. He was our Executive Vice President from August 2008 to February 2015 and our Operating Officer from November 2006 to February 2015.

Our Board believes that Mr. Williams will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our team members and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

extensive service as Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Operating Officer and various other operational leadership positions during his 18-year career with us;

intimate, working knowledge of our day-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives;

service on other public company boards;

proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

high level of commitment to our Board of Directors, our business, our team members, and our shareholders, and a high level of integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

 

•  qualification as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the federal securities laws;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2016

JAMES R. VERRIER

Age: 56

Committees:  Audit Committee

          Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Now retired, Mr. Verrier served as a Board Advisor to BorgWarner, Inc. (powertrain solutions) from August 1, 2018 until his retirement on February 28, 2019. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and Director of BorgWarner, Inc. from January 2013 until July 31, 2018, and President of BorgWarner from March 2012 until July 31, 2018.

Our Board believes that Mr. Verrier will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  service as a director, Chief Executive Officer and President of BorgWarner, Inc., a successful publicly-traded global automotive industry components and parts supplier of significant size;

•  prior service on another public company board;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2009

 

JAMES L. WAINSCOTT

Age: 62

Committees:  Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

           (Chair and Lead Director)

           Human Resources and Compensation Committee

Now retired, Mr. Wainscott was Chairman of the Board of AK Steel Holding Corporation (steel producer) from January 2006 to May 2016; and President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of AK Steel Holding Corporation from October 2003 to January 2016.

Our Board believes that Mr. Wainscott will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AK Steel Holding Corporation, a successful global industrial company of significant size;

•  prior service on other public company boards;

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors;

•  proven ability to effectively serve as our Lead Director and to otherwise work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors and integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO

Director since 2015

20
  

THOMAS L. WILLIAMS

Age: 60

Committees:  None

Mr. Williams has been our Chairman of the Board since January 2016; and our Chief Executive Officer since February 2015. He was our Executive Vice President from August 2008 to February 2015 and our Operating Officer from November 2006 to February 2015. Mr. Williams is also a director at The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company as of February 26, 2019, and was a director of Chart Industries, Inc. until May 22, 2019.

Our Board believes that Mr. Williams will effectively serve our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders based on his significant and diverse experiences, skills, qualifications and viewpoints from, among other things:

•  extensive service as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Operating Officer and in various operational leadership positions during his16-year career with us;

•  intimate, working knowledge of ourday-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives;

•  present service on another public company board;

•  proven ability to work efficiently and effectively with our other Directors to oversee and address issues and risks facing our business; and

•  high level of commitment to our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders, and a high level of integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism.

LOGO


Item 1 – Election of Directors

ANNUAL ELECTIONS; MAJORITY VOTING; NO CUMULATIVE VOTINGDirector Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require at least a majority of our Directors to be “independent” as defined in the listing standards established by the New York Stock Exchange. Our Board of Directors has also adopted standards for Director independence, which are set forth in our Independence Standards for Directors.

Of the twelve current members of our Board of Directors, ten are independent based on our Board of Directors’ consideration of the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. In addition, each of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is composed entirely of independent Directors. As a result, independent Directors directly oversee critical matters such as our executive compensation program, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, policies and practices, the integrity of our financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting.

Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following ten individuals who currently serve as Directors are independent: Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz, Linda A. Harty, William F. Lacey, Kevin A. Lobo, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier and James L. Wainscott.

Among other things, our Board of Directors does not consider a Director to be independent unless it affirmatively determines that the Director has no material relationship with us either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors annually reviews and determines which of its members are independent based on the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. During such review, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors broadly consider all facts and circumstances which they deem relevant, including any commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships between us and any of our Directors.

In fiscal year 2022, after considering the facts and circumstances applicable to each Director, our Board of Directors determined that Ms. Evanko and Messrs. Fritz, Lacey and Lobo served as executive officers of companies that have existing customer and/or supplier relationships with us. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Board of Directors further analyzed these relationships and found that each of Ms. Evanko and Messrs. Fritz, Lacey and Lobo does not receive any direct or indirect personal benefits as a result of these relationships, that the relationships were on ordinary course, competitive terms, and that the amounts paid to or by us under such relationships fell significantly below the threshold for independence provided in the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. Our Board of Directors thus affirmatively concluded that each of Ms. Evanko and Messrs. Fritz, Lacey and Lobo is independent.

Annual Elections; Majority Voting; No Cumulative Voting

Our Amended and Restated Regulations provide for the annual election of our entire Board of Directors. Accordingly, each Director elected at this Annual Meeting of Shareholders will hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his or her successor is elected.

Our Amended Articles of Incorporation provide for a majority voting standard in the annual election of our Directors. Accordingly, at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders, each candidate for Director is elected only if the votes “for” the candidate exceed the votes “against” the candidate, unless the number of candidates exceeds the number of Directors to be elected. If the number of candidates exceeds the number of Directors to be elected, then in that election the candidates receiving the greatest number of votes shall be elected. Abstentions and brokernon-votes shall not be counted as votes “for” or “against” a candidate, and shareholders are not able to cumulate votes in the election of Directors.

NEW ELECTIONSAND RETIREMENTSNew Elections and Departures

We had no new Director elections in fiscal year 2022. On October 24, 2018, Robert J. Kohlhepp, Klaus-Peter Műller and Wolfgang R. Schmitt27, 2021 Candy M. Obourn retired from our Board of Directors in accordance with the mandatory Director retirement provisions of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Immediately prior to those retirements, Mr. Kohlhepp served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Mr. Műller served on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and Mr. Schmitt served on the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Laura K. Thompson was identified as a potential Director candidate by a third-party search firm and was evaluated by management and our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Upon our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation and as permitted under our Amended and Restated Regulations, our Board of Directors elected Ms. Thompson to our Board of Directors on January 23, 2019 for a term expiring at this Annual Meeting of Shareholders. More detail and information on our Director recruiting, succession and refreshment process can be found under the caption “Director Selection and Nomination, Qualifications and Diversity.”Directors.

 

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 1:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR

EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

2022 Proxy Statement21


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

BOARD OF DIRECTORSBoard and Committee Structure

MEETINGSAND ATTENDANCE; EXECUTIVE SESSIONS

During fiscal year 2019, there were nine meetings of our Board of Directors. Each Director attended at least 75% of the meetings held by our Board of Directors and the Committees of our Board of Directors on which he or she served.

We hold a regularly scheduled meeting of our Board of Directors in conjunction with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders absent an appropriate reason. All of the members of our Board of Directors at the time of our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders attended that meeting.

In accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, ournon-management Directors are scheduled to meet regularly in executive sessions without management and, if required, our independent Directors will meet at least once annually. Additional meetings of ournon-management Directors may be scheduled from time to time when ournon-management Directors determine that such meetings are desirable. Ournon-management Directors met four times during fiscal year 2019.

NUMBER; CURRENT TERM; RELATIONSHIPS

Our Board of Directors presently consists of eleven members. The current term of each member of our Board of Directors expires at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Assuming the election of all of the Director nominees, we expect our Board of Directors to consist of eleven members after the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. None of our Directors are related to each other and no arrangements or understandings exist pursuant to which any Director was selected as a Director or Director nominee.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require at least a majority of our Directors to be “independent” as defined in the listing standards established by the New York Stock Exchange. Our Board of Directors has also adopted standards for Director independence, which are set forth in our Independence Standards for Directors.

We strongly favor a governance structure that includes an independent Board of Directors. Of the eleven current members of our Board of Directors, nine are independent based on our Board of Directors’ consideration of the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. In addition, in fiscal year 2019, each of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors was composed entirely of independent Directors. As a result, our independent Directors directly oversee critical matters such as our executive compensation program for executive officers, our corporate governance guidelines, policies and practices, the integrity of our financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting.

Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following nine individuals who currently serve as Directors are independent: Robert G. Bohn, Linda S. Harty, Kevin A. Lobo, Candy M. Obourn, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier and James L. Wainscott.

Among other things, our Board of Directors does not consider a Director to be independent unless it affirmatively determines that the Director has no material relationship with us either directly or as a

partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us. Our Board of Directors annually reviews and determines which of its members are independent based on the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. During such review, our Board of Directors broadly considers all facts and circumstances which it deems relevant, including any commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships between us and any of our Directors.

In fiscal year 2019, after considering the facts and circumstances applicable to each Director, our Board of Directors determined that each of Ms. Thompson, and Messrs. Lobo and Verrier served as an executive officer of a company that has an existing customer or supplier relationship with us, and that each such relationship required further analysis to confirm his or her independence. Our Board of Directors further analyzed these relationships and found that none of these Directors receive any direct or indirect personal benefits as a result of these relationships, and that the amounts paid to or by us under such relationships fell significantly below the thresholds for independence provided in the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors. Based on such further analyses, our Board of Directors affirmatively concluded that each of these Directors is independent.

CURRENT LEADERSHIP STRUCTURECurrent Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors currently employs a “dual leadership” structure. We have a Lead Director who is also the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and a Chairman of the Board, who is our Chief Executive Officer.

LOGO

Thomas L. Williams

Chairman of the Board since 2016

LOGO

James L. Wainscott

Lead Independent Director since 2016

Our Lead Director is elected solely by the independent members of our Board of Directors and holds a position separate and independent from our Chairman of the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will serve as our Lead Director and that the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is elected every five years.

The specific authorities, duties and responsibilities of our Lead Director are described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Among other things, our Lead Director presides over and supervises the conduct of all meetings of our independent Directors, calls meetings of our independent Directors, and prepares and approves all agendas and schedules for meetings of our Board.

Our Board believes that having a Lead Director who is elected by our independent Directors ensures that our Board will at all times have an independent Director in a leadership position. At the same time, our Board of Directors believes that it is important to maintain flexibility in its leadership structure to allow for a member of management to serve in a leadership position alongside the Lead Director if our Board of Directors determines that such a leadership structure best meets the needs of our Board, our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders.

Our Board has determined that this leadership structure is currently more efficient and effective than a structure which employs a single, independent Chairman of the Board. Our Board of Directors views this structure as one that ensures both independence in leadership and a balance of knowledge, power and authority. For example, our leadership structure employs both a Chairman of the Board who is also our Chief Executive Officer and who possesses an intimate working knowledge of ourday-to-day business, plans, strategies and initiatives, and a Lead Director who has a strong working relationship with ournon-management, independent Directors. These two individuals combine their unique knowledge and perspectives to ensure that management and our independent Directors work together as effectively as possible. Among other things, our Chairman of the Board ensures that our Board addresses strategic issues that management considers critical, while our Lead Director ensures that our Board addresses strategic issues that our independent Directors consider critical.

Our Board recognizes, however, that no single leadership model may always be appropriate. Accordingly, our Board of Directors regularly reviews its leadership structure to ensure that it continues to represent the most efficient and effective structure for our Board of Directors, our business, our employeesteam members and our shareholders.

DIRECTOR SELECTIONAND NOMINATION, QUALIFICATIONSAND DIVERSITY

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of our Board is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending potential Director candidates. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee ensures that Director recruiting, succession and refreshment are persistent areas of focus and regularly reviews the size, composition and independence of our Board, and any expected vacancies, in determining whether and to what extent to actively recruit new Directors or to replace departing Directors.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee utilizes a variety of methods and processes to identify potential Director candidates, including through reputable third-party search firms, unsolicited recommendations from other third-party search firms, and referrals from current or past members of our Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will give appropriate consideration to qualified persons recommended by shareholders for nomination as Directors (provided that such recommendations comply with the procedures set forth under the caption “Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees”) and will consider such candidates on the same basis as candidates recommended by other sources. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee generally will not, however, consider recommendations for Director nominees submitted by individuals who are not affiliated with us.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has developed and implemented a robust process to ensure that its formal Director searches are appropriately scoped and designed to produce a slate of potential candidates representing a broad range of backgrounds, educations, experiences, skills and viewpoints that will enable them, individually and collectively, to address the issues affecting our Board, our business, our employees and our shareholders, and optimize the functioning and decision-making and oversight roles of our Board and its Committees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee currently focuses on the following key search and evaluation criteria, but considers the entirety of each proposed candidate’s credentials and all available information that may be relevant to each candidate’s nomination.

 

Key Criteria

 

Overall Philosophy and Approach

Culture and Values

22
  The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee places high value on cultural fit. Our Directors must be able to work together to oversee efficiently and effectively the issues and risks facing our business, and have the commitment, integrity, honesty, judgment and professionalism required under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Global Code of Business Conduct, and to otherwise serve the long-term interests of our Board of Directors, our business, our employees and our shareholders.

Diversity

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee firmly believes diversity is critical to a well-functioning Board of Directors, and is committed to enhancing diversity on our Board. As a result, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee directs its search firms to identify and evaluate a robust selection of qualified candidates representing a broad range of diverse characteristics, including gender, race, ethnicity, and cultural and geographical backgrounds. In our most recent Director search, for example, a majority of the candidates presented for consideration were diverse candidates and the search ultimately resulted in the election of a female Director.

Skills and Qualifications

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also believes it is essential to have a Board with the range of skills and experience needed to effectively evaluate, monitor and oversee the wide range of considerations presented by the size and scope of our Company, operations, products and markets. As a result, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to identify nominees who are well equipped with a broad set of key skills, including the following:

•  current or recent service as a Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer or Chief Financial Officer, or other senior leadership positions at publicly-traded companies;

•  significant experience in corporate strategy, manufacturing, sales and marketing, industrial business, aerospace business, international businesses, finance and accounting, technology and digital applications, and other key areas;

•  ability to effectively evaluate, monitor and oversee the most critical risks facing our business; and/or

•  independence under the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Independence Standards for Directors.

LOGO


Following its initial screening and evaluations, the Corporate Governance and Nominating

 Board Committees; Committee may seek additional information regarding, and may request interviews with any candidate it wishes to further pursue. Based on all information reviewed and interviews conducted, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee collectively determines whether to recommend the candidate to our entire Board of Directors.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, utilizing its robust and thoughtful approach to Director recruiting, succession and refreshment, has built an experienced, diverse and independent Board that provides significant oversight over our plans and strategies for growth, financial performance and shareholder value creation.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees are collectively engaged in identifying, overseeing, evaluating and managing the material risks facing our business to ensure that our strategies and objectives work to minimize such risks. Our Board of Directors has the ultimate responsibility to monitor the risks facing our business. Among other things, our Board of Directors reviews and discusses in detail, at least annually, our corporate strategy and annual operating plan, which covers significant strategic topics such as our key markets, operational priorities under The Win Strategy, strategic positioning, financial and operational outlooks, capital allocation, balance sheet strength, debt portfolio and positions, share repurchase activity, and dividend history and strategies. Our Board also maintains regular oversight of other key risk areas such as corporate strategy, management succession planning, cybersecurity, enterprise risk management, and environmental, social and governance matters.

Various members of our management are responsible for ourday-to-day risk management activities, including members of our Human Resources, Internal Audit and Compliance, Legal, Tax, Risk Management, Treasury, Finance, and Information Technology departments, and our internal Cyber Security Committee. Those individuals are charged with identifying, overseeing, evaluating and managing risks in their areas of responsibility and for ensuring that any significant risks are addressed with our Board or the appropriate Board Committees. The Committees of our Board of Directors are each responsible for the various areas of risk oversight as described in the “Committees of our Board of Directors” section of this Proxy Statement. Management and the Chair of the applicable Committee ensure that any significant risks are reported to and addressed with the entire Board of Directors. Our Lead Director and the other Committee Chairs ensure that risk management is a recurring agenda item for meetings of our Board and its Committees.

Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees also engage outside advisors where appropriate to assist in the identification, oversight, evaluation and management of the risks facing our business. These outside advisors include our independent registered public accounting firm, external legal counsel and insurance providers, and the independent executive andnon-employee Director compensation consultant retained by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.

Our Board believes that its current level of independence, leadership structure and qualifications and diversity of its members facilitate the effective identification, oversight, evaluation and management of risk. Our Lead Director meets regularly with our other independent Directors without management to discuss current and potential risks and the means of mitigating those risks, and has the authority to direct and evaluate our risk management efforts.

Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees view the risk management role of our Board of Directors and its Committees, and their relationship with management in the identification, oversight, evaluation and management of risk, as paramount to the short-term viability and long-term

sustainability of our business. The ability to effectively monitor and oversee the most critical risks facing our business is a key consideration for our Board and its Committees in identifying potential Director nominees and evaluating our current Directors and Committee assignments.

COMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BOARD COMMITTEES; COMMITTEE CHARTERSCharters

Our Board has established and delegated certain authorities and responsibilities to three committees: the Human Resources and

Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Audit Committee. Each Committee of our Board is governed by a written charter which is posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com. Shareholders may request copies of these charters, free of charge, by writing to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling(216) 896-3000.

All members of each Committee are independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange as well as our Independence Standards for Directors. Each Committee regularly reports its activities to the full Board of Directors.

Information about the respective Committee purposes, memberships and number of meetings are reflected in the following chart:

Standing CommitteePurpose

Members in
FY2019

Meetings in  

FY2019  

Human Resources & Compensation

Committee

Oversight of our processes plans and programs for compensation of our executive officers andnon-employee Directors, succession planning for executive officers, employee benefit, equity and incentive compensation plans, and other related matters.

C. Obourn*

R. Bohn

K. Lobo

J. Scaminace

J. Verrier

J. Wainscott

5  

Corporate

Governance &

Nominating

Committee

Oversight of our corporate governance framework, structure and policies, and other related matters.

J. Wainscott*

L. Harty

C. Obourn

J. Scaminace

Å. Svensson

2  

Audit Committee

Oversight of our audit, compliance, and other related matters, including integrity of financial statements and financial reporting, accounting practices, legal and regulatory compliance, internal audit functions and processes, and independence, qualifications, and performance of the independent auditor.

L. Harty* (ACFE)

R. Bohn

K. Lobo (ACFE)

Å. Svensson

J. Verrier

5  

* Committee Chair

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Linda S. Harty, the Chair of the Audit Committee, and Kevin A. Lobo, a member of the Audit Committee, are audit committee financial experts (designated in the above chart as ACFE) as defined in the federal securities laws.

Each of our Committees works with the applicable members of our Human Resources, Internal Audit, andEnterprise Compliance, Legal, Tax, Risk Management, Treasury, Finance, and Information Technology

departments and other management personneldepartments to oversee and evaluate other risks or relevant concerns to each Committee.

THE HUMAN RESOURCESAND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The  Human Resources and Compensation Committee oversees the administration,

Members: Joseph Scaminace (CHAIR), Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz, Kevin A. Lobo, James
R. Verrier, James L. Wainscott

Number of meetings in fiscal year

2022: 4

  KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

Administration, structure and determination of our executive compensation program. In addition,

ESG strategies, initiatives, policies and risks related to (a) key compensation and benefit plans (including the Human Resourcesinclusion and Compensation Committee worksimpact of any ESG-based performance measures), (b) executive compensation program, strategy, structure and mix, (c) leadership performance, development and succession, (d) compensation-related ratings and disclosures, and (e) other ESG areas impacting or resulting from the Committee’s duties and responsibilities or as the Board may otherwise delegate.

Working with its independent executive compensation consultant and our human resources, legal and other management personnel to oversee and evaluate other risks arising from and relating to our compensation policies and practices for all employees,team members, our succession planning and talent development strategies and initiatives, and other human resources issues facing our business.

In particular, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee monitors any significant existing or potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees through its oversight of an annual compensation risk review conducted by management and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant. The results of this review are evaluated and discussed among management, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and its independent executive compensation consultant and, if any significant risks are identified, the full Board of Directors. Based on the review conducted during fiscal year 2019, we believe that our current compensation policies and practices are designed to mitigate risks related to compensation, and such policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.

The annual compensation risk review begins with a global assessment of any plans or programs that could potentially encourage excessive risk-taking or otherwise present significant risks to our business. The review also takes into account our individual business units to determine whether any of them carries a significant portion of our risk profile, structures compensation significantly different than others or is significantly more profitable than others. The review then evaluates whether the applicable plans and programs are likely to encourage excessive risk-taking or detrimental behavior, vary significantly from our risk-reward structure, or otherwise present significant risks to our business.

During our fiscal year 2019 compensation risk review, we also identified and evaluated various mechanisms that we currently have in place that may serve to mitigate any existing or potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, including the following:

our executive officers and other management-level employees are compensated with a mix of annual and long-term incentives, fixed andat-risk compensation, cash and multiple forms of equity compensation;issues.

 

compensation packages gradually become more focused on long-term,at-risk and equity compensation as our employees ascend to and through management-level positions;

 

our global compensation plans and programs generally utilize the same or substantially similar performance measures;

we use multiple performance measures to determine payout levels under certain elements of incentive compensation and different performance measures for our annual incentives as compared to our long-term incentives;

the performance of our employees is not evaluated or measured based solely on changes in our stock price;

our incentive compensation programs generally limit payouts to a specified maximum, while those that do not are mitigated by other factors (e.g., stock appreciation rights are mitigated by long-term vesting periods and stock ownership guidelines);

we do not offer “guaranteed” bonuses and all of our incentive compensation elements carry downside risk for participants;

our executive officers are subject to specific stock ownership guidelines, a “claw-back” policy and provisions requiring forfeiture of certain elements of incentive compensation upon termination for cause;

our compensation packages, including severance packages and supplemental pensions, are within market ranges;

the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has the discretion to assess the quality of our results in relation to our various performance measures and the risks taken to attain those results in approving final incentive payouts;

ourde-centralized organizational structure lessens the impact of any excessive risks taken by individual business units or operating groups; and

our employees are evaluated, measured and assessed based on their compliance with our Global Code of Business Conduct and other internal policies and controls, and the extent to which they act in the best interests of our business and our shareholders.

During the annual compensation risk review, we also consider whether any changes to our compensation plans and programs may be necessary to further mitigate risk. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee did not make any changes based on the results of our fiscal year 2019 review.

THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAND NOMINATING COMMITTEE

Among other things, the  Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for evaluating

Members: James L. Wainscott (CHAIR), Lance M. Fritz, Linda A. Harty, William F. Lacey,

Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson

Number of meetings in fiscal year

2022: 2

  KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

Evaluating and recommending to our Board of Directors qualified nominees for election as Directors and qualified Directors for Committee membership, establishing evaluation procedures for the performance of our Board of Directors and its Committees, developing corporate governance guidelines and independence standards, and considering other matters regarding our corporate governance structure. In addition,

ESG strategies, initiatives, policies and risks related to (a) Board performance, structure, composition and refreshment, (b) corporate governance ratings and disclosures, (c) shareholder engagement processes and feedback, (d) Board and committee oversight responsibilities and meeting cadences on ESG matters, and (e) other ESG areas impacting or resulting from the Corporate GovernanceCommittee’s duties and Nominating Committee worksresponsibilities or as the Board may otherwise delegate.

Working with our legal and other management personnel to oversee and evaluate:evaluate other risks relating to:

 

Director independence, qualifications and diversity issues;

 

Board of Directors and Committee leadership, composition, function and effectiveness;

 

alignment of the interests of our shareholders with the performance of our Board of Directors;

 

compliance with applicable corporate governance rules and standards; and

 

other corporate governance issues and trends.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

2022 Proxy Statement23


Corporate Governance

 Audit Committee

Members: Linda A. Harty (CHAIR) (ACFE), Jillian C. Evanko (ACFE), William F. Lacey (ACFE),
Kevin A. Lobo (ACFE), Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson (ACFE), James R. Verrier

Number of meetings in fiscal year

2022: 6

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is our standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Each member of our Audit Committee is independent, as defined in our Independence Standards for Directors and in compliance with the independence standards applicable to audit committee members under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and under the federal securities laws.

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for appointing,Appointing, compensating, retaining, and overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm and evaluating its independence, approving all audit andnon-audit engagements with our independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing our annual and quarterly financial statements, internal and independent audit plans, the results of such audits and the adequacy of our internal control structure.

In addition,

ESG strategies, initiatives, policies and risks related to (a) ethics, integrity, and compliance, (b) audit and financial controls, reporting and disclosures, (c) audit and financial implications of ESG data and processes, (d) governance structures, financial impacts and funding status of employee retirement plans, and (e) other ESG areas impacting or resulting from the Audit Committee worksCommittee’s duties and responsibilities or as the Board may otherwise delegate.

Working with our internal audit, and compliance, legal, tax, treasury and finance departments and other management personneldepartments, to oversee and evaluate other significant risks including major financial,(financial, tax, strategic, operational, legal, regulatory) and operational risk exposuresmanagement policies, guidelines and risks related to compliance with legalprocesses for assessing and regulatory requirements, and significant litigation and claims.managing such risks.

The Audit Committee also meets

Meeting privately at each of its meetings with representatives from our independent registered public accounting firm and our Vice President – Audit, Compliance and Enterprise Risk Management.

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Jillian C. Evanko, Linda A. Harty, William F. Lacey, Kevin A. Lobo and Laura K. Thompson, are audit committee financial experts (designated above as (ACFE)) as defined in the federal securities laws.

Meetings and Attendance; Executive Sessions

During fiscal year 2022, there were ten meetings of our Board of Directors. Each Director attended 100% of the meetings held by our Board of Directors and the Committees of our Board of Directors on which he or she served, except one director who was excused from one meeting for a valid reason.

We hold a regularly scheduled meeting of our Board of Directors in conjunction with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders absent an appropriate reason. We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders virtually in 2021 and all of the members of our Board of Directors attended and were available to answer shareholder questions.

In accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, our non-management Directors are scheduled to meet regularly in executive sessions without management and, if required, our independent Directors will meet at least once annually. Additional meetings of our non-management Directors may be scheduled from time to time when our non-management Directors determine that such meetings are desirable. Our non-management Directors met four times during fiscal year 2022.

LOGO

24LOGO


Corporate Governance

Director Education and Orientation Program

Our director orientation program includes extensive meetings with management and other Directors and familiarizes new directors with The Win Strategy and Parker’s businesses, strategies, policies and corporate governance framework; assists them in developing company and industry knowledge; and educates them with respect to their fiduciary duties and legal responsibilities.

Our Board places high importance on the continuous development and education of our Board members. Directors have ongoing education and development opportunities through participation in Board and Committee meetings, and publications and activities offered by reputable third party organizations. Directors receive specialized presentations on an established cadence from senior-level leaders across our global businesses and functions. When appropriate, our Board also travels to put “feet on the ground” at Company locations to expand their knowledge and oversight of the Company. Most recently, the Board visited our facilities in Clyde, New York and Erie, Pennsylvania as part of our regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings in April 2022.

Board and Committee Evaluations

Our Board recognizes that a rigorous and constructive evaluation process is an essential component of good corporate governance and Board effectiveness. Under the leadership of our Lead Director, the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee oversees the annual evaluation process and periodically reviews the format of the process to help ensure it is eliciting actionable feedback with respect to the effectiveness of the Board, Board committees and each individual Director. The annual evaluation process consists of the following components:

Continuous Evaluation/

Annual Review

   Through ongoing discussions at Board and Committee Meetings, our Board and Committees are continually seeking ways to strengthen their governance and oversight practices and effectiveness.

   Towards the end of our fiscal year, each director completes a questionnaire assessing the performance of the Board and its committees on which he or she serves.

   Our Lead Director and Chairman also conduct evaluations of each individual Director towards the end of our fiscal year.

LOGO

Assessment

   The questionnaire results are provided to the Board and to each of the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees, generally at our regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings in August.

   The results of the individual Director evaluations are also shared with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in August.

LOGO

Discussion

   The Board and each such committee discuss the results and identify areas for continuous improvement. The results of the committee sessions are communicated to the full Board.

LOGO

Feedback

   As a result of the Board’s 2022 self- assessment process, the Board identified opportunities to further strengthen the Board’s practices in areas relating to Board and committee-level oversight of ESG matters; meeting process efficiency; director education; and engagement with management.

2022 Proxy Statement25


Corporate Governance

OTHER GOVERNANCE MATTERSBoard Strategic and Risk Oversight

Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees are collectively engaged in identifying, overseeing, evaluating and managing the strategic priorities and material risks facing our business to ensure that our strategies and objectives align with the goals of The Win Strategy and work to minimize such risks. Our Board believes that its current level of independence, leadership structure and qualifications and diversity of its members facilitate the effective identification, oversight, evaluation and management of our business strategy and related risks.

REVIEWAND APPROVALOF TRANSACTIONSWITH RELATED PERSONSBoard’s Role in Strategic Oversight

LOGO

One of the Board’s primary responsibilities is overseeing management’s development and execution of The Win Strategy. In addition to the ongoing activities detailed in the paragraph to the right, our Board conducts an in-depth annual review of our corporate strategy and annual operating plan, which covers significant strategic topics such as our key markets, operational priorities under The Win Strategy, strategic positioning, financial and operational outlooks, capital allocation, balance sheet strength, debt portfolio and positions, share repurchase activity, and dividend history and strategies.

Led by our CEO, our executive management team develops and implements strategic goals and priorities under The Win Strategy. On a quarterly basis the CEO, our executive leadership team and other business leaders provide detailed business and strategy updates to the Board including progress against business objectives, updates on the competitive landscape facing the Company, economic trends, acquisition and divestiture opportunities and other matters.

LOGO

26LOGO


Corporate Governance

 Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees view the risk management role of our Board of Directors and its Committees, and their relationship with management in the identification, oversight, evaluation and management of risk, as paramount to the short-term viability and long-term sustainability of our business.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors has the ultimate responsibility to monitor the risks facing our business. Among other things, our Board of Directors receives a report from our Audit Committee which reviews and discusses in detail, at least annually, the business and operational risks identified through our enterprise risk management and integrated risk management programs which are led by our Vice President of Audit and Compliance. As set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, although it may delegate certain oversight responsibilities to its Committees, our full Board retains ultimate oversight responsibility over the Company’s strategies, initiatives, policies and risks related to ESG matters, including in the areas of corporate strategy, purpose and values, environmental sustainability (e.g., climate targets and actions), social responsibility, team member safety and engagement, diversity, equity and inclusion, cybersecurity, and external reporting. For more detail on the Board’s role in risk management, including cybersecurity and ESG oversight, see the spotlight sections on the next page.

LOGO   

OUTSIDE ADVISORS

Management and our Board of Directors and its Committees also engage outside advisors where appropriate to assist in the identification, oversight, evaluation and management of the risks facing our business. These outside advisors include our independent registered public accounting firm, external legal counsel and insurance providers, and the independent compensation consultant retained by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.

LOGO

LEAD DIRECTOR AND BOARD COMMITTEES

The Committees of our Board of Directors are each responsible for the various areas of risk oversight as described in the “Board and Committee Structure” and “Board Strategic and Risk Oversight” sections of this Proxy Statement. Management and the Chair of the applicable Committee ensure that any significant risks are reported to and addressed with the entire Board of Directors. Our Lead Director and the other Committee Chairs ensure that risk management is a recurring agenda item for meetings of our Board and its Committees. Our Lead Director meets regularly with our other independent Directors without management to discuss current and potential risks and the means of mitigating those risks, and has the authority to direct and evaluate our risk management efforts.

LOGO

LOGO

MANAGEMENT

Various members of management are responsible for our day-to-day risk management activities, including members of our Human Resources, Internal Audit and Compliance, Legal, Tax, Risk Management, Treasury, Finance, and Information Technology departments. We have an internal Cyber Security Committee comprised of our Vice President-Chief Digital and Information Officer and other senior members of our IT department. We also have an ESG Steering Committee which is comprised of senior management, including our Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary and our EHS leader. Working together with our CEO, these management committees and individuals are charged with identifying, overseeing, evaluating and managing risks in their areas of responsibility and for ensuring that any significant risks are addressed with our Board or the appropriate Board Committees.

LOGO

2022 Proxy Statement27


Corporate Governance

Spotlight: Oversight of Cybersecurity

Our Board understands the importance of maintaining a secure environment for our products, data and systems that effectively supports our business objectives and customer needs. We have adopted comprehensive Information Security Policies and Standards that clearly articulate Parker’s expectations and requirements with respect to acceptable use, risk management, data privacy, education and awareness, security incident management and reporting, identity and access management, third-party management, security (with respect to physical assets, products, networks and systems), security monitoring and vulnerability identification. These policies and standards set forth a detailed security incident management and reporting protocol, with clear escalation timelines and responsibilities. We also maintain a global incident response plan and regularly conduct exercises to help with our overall preparedness. We believe cybersecurity is the responsibility of every team member. We take measures to improve and update our cybersecurity program, including independent program assessments, penetration testing and scanning of our systems for vulnerabilities. The Digital and Information Technology strategy is led by our Vice President – Chief Digital and Information Officer, who provides multiple updates each year to the Board regarding this program, including information about cyber-risk management and the status of projects to strengthen cybersecurity effectiveness. In addition, the Board receives an in-depth report, at least annually, on the overall cybersecurity program from our Vice President – Chief Digital and Information Officer and our Vice President–Cyber Security and Infrastructure.

Spotlight: Succession Planning

As reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, one of the Board’s primary responsibilities includes planning for CEO succession and overseeing management’s succession planning for other senior executives. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term program for effective senior leadership development and succession, as well as short-term contingency plans for emergency and ordinary course contingencies. The program plays an important role in our success and the effectiveness of our leadership development program.

The Board and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee works with our CEO, Executive Vice President – Human

Resources and External Affairs and other senior leaders to plan for succession. The Board has an opportunity to meet regularly with executives at many levels across the Company through formal presentations at Board meetings and other informal interaction throughout the year. Our Board reviews succession planning and management development topics on an ongoing basis, including an in-depth review of potential successors to key leadership positions at least annually.

Spotlight: Board’s ESG Oversight

Our ESG program includes a range of initiatives around corporate social responsibility and sustainability, taking into account the interests of our key stakeholders, including our shareholders, team members, customers and communities. Issues that we focus on include, among others, workplace health and safety, climate risk, water conservation, human capital management, diversity, equity and inclusion, cybersecurity, and business ethics and compliance.

Our Board maintains oversight over ESG matters at the full Board level and through our relevant committees, while senior management manages and monitors such matters on a day-to-day basis throughout the year, supported by our internal ESG Steering Committee, which includes our Chief Operating Officer and other members of our senior management. The full Board reviews our ESG program at least annually. In August 2022, we amended our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of each of our Committees to expressly include ESG areas of oversight responsibility for the full Board and its Committees.

28LOGO


Corporate Governance

The primary areas of ESG oversight responsibility of the Board and Committees are:

Full Board

Our full Board retains ultimate oversight

responsibility over strategies, initiatives,

policies and risks related to ESG matters,

including in the areas of corporate

strategy, purpose and values,

environmental sustainability (e.g., climate

targets and actions), social responsibility,

team member safety and engagement,

diversity, equity and inclusion,

cybersecurity, and external reporting.

LOGO

Audit Committee

Human Resources and

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

and Nominating Committee

Review, monitor and evaluate ESGReview, monitor and evaluate ESG
Review, monitor and evaluate ESGstrategies, initiatives, policies and risksstrategies, initiatives, policies and risks
strategies, initiatives, policies and risksrelated to (a) key compensation programrelated to (a) Board performance,
related to (a) ethics, integrity andand benefit plans (including the inclusionstructure, composition and refreshment,
compliance, (b) audit and financialand impact of any ESG-based performance(b) corporate governance ratings and
controls, reporting and disclosures, (c)measures), (b) executive compensationdisclosures, (c) shareholder engagement
audit and financial implications of ESG dataprogram strategy, structure and mix, (c)processes and feedback, (d) Board and
and processes, (d) governance structures,leadership performance, development andcommittee oversight responsibilities and
financial impacts and funding status ofsuccession, (d) compensation-relatedmeeting cadences on ESG matters, and (e)
employee retirement plans, and (e) otherratings and disclosures, and (e) other ESGother ESG areas impacting or resulting
ESG areas impacting or resulting from theareas impacting or resulting from thefrom the Committee’s duties and
Committee’s duties and responsibilities orCommittee’s duties and responsibilities orresponsibilities or as the Board may

as the Board may otherwise delegate.

as the Board may otherwise delegate.

otherwise delegate.

2022 Proxy Statement29


Corporate Governance

Communications with Directors

Our shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with our Board of Directors as a group, with the non-management Directors as a group, or with any individual Director by sending written communications to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary. Complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be forwarded directly to the Chair of the Audit Committee. All other communications will be provided to the individual Director(s) or group of Directors to whom they are addressed. Copies of all communications will be provided to all other Directors; provided, however, that any such communications that are considered to be improper for submission to the intended recipients will not be provided to the Directors. Examples of communications that would be considered improper for submission include customer complaints, solicitations, communications that do not relate, directly or indirectly, to our business and/or our subsidiaries, or communications that relate to improper or irrelevant topics.

Other Governance Matters

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for considering questions of possible conflicts of interest of Directors and executive officers and for making recommendations to prevent, minimize or eliminate such conflicts of interest. Our Global Code of Business Conduct provides that our Directors, officers, employeesand other team members and their spouses and other close family members must avoid interests or activities that create any actual or potential conflict of interest. These restrictions cover, among other things, interests or activities that result in receipt of improper personal benefits by any person as a result of his or her position as our Director, officer, employeeor other team member or as a spouse or other close family member of any of our Directors, officers or employees.other team members. Our Global Code of Business Conduct also requires our Directors, officers and employeesother team members to promptly disclose any potential conflicts of interest to our Corporate Compliance Office. We also require that each of our executive officers and Directors complete a detailed annual questionnaire that requires, among other things, disclosure of any transactions with a related person meeting the minimum threshold for disclosure under the relevant U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC,(“SEC”) rules. All responses to the annual questionnaires are reviewed and analyzed by our legal counsel and, as necessary or appropriate, presented to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for analysis, consideration and, if appropriate, approval.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the following in determining if any transaction with a related person or party should be approved, ratified or rejected:

 

the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;

 

the material terms of the transaction;

 

the importance of the transaction to the related person and to us;

 

whether the transaction would impair the judgment or the exercise of the fiduciary obligations of any Director or executive officer;

 

the possible alternatives to entering into the transaction;

 

whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those available to third parties; and

 

the potential for an actual or apparent conflict of interest.

During fiscal year 2019,2022, we revieweddetermined that no material related-party transactions exist which would require disclosure under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rules or otherwise require approval, ratification, or rejection of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. This review included a review of the annual questionnaires and determined that no related-party transactions exist. This review included a detailed evaluation of the transactions reviewed and analyzed by our Board of Directors in determining Director independence as described in the “Director Independence” section of this Proxy Statement. Based on management’s review and analysis, no actual or potential related-party transactions were presented to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for analysis, consideration or approval.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers, Directors and beneficial owners of more than 10%None of our Common SharesDirectors are related to file initial stock ownership reportseach other and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC regulations require that we receive copies of these reports. Based solely onno arrangements or understandings exist pursuant to which any Director was selected as a review of these reports and upon written representations from our executive officers and Directors, we believe that all Directors, Officers and 10%Director or greater beneficial owners complied with all such filing requirements for fiscal year 2019, except that (i) Catherine A. Suever, Executive Vice President – Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer, filed one late Form 4 to correct the inadvertent underreporting of 1,620 shares awarded to her, and (ii) Robert G. Bohn, Director filed one late Form 4 to report 120 shares acquired through a broker dividend reinvestment plan.nominee.

30LOGO


Corporate Governance

PROXY ACCESSProxy Access

In 2018, our Shareholders approved an amendment to our Code of Regulations (subsequently restated and namedOur Amended and Restated Regulations) toRegulations permit a shareholder, or a group of up to twenty shareholders, owning three percent or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s annual meeting proxy materials a number of director nominees up to a greater of (x) two, or (y) twenty percent of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in theour Amended and Restated Regulations.

“CLAW-BACK” POLICYStock Ownership Guidelines

Our Board of Directors maintains a “claw-back” policy which allows us to recover or withhold any Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses, Converted RONA Bonuses or LTIP Awards which are paid or payable to an executive officer if:

payment, grant or vesting was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement of any of our financial statements filed with the SEC;

our Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion that the fraud or misconduct of the executive officer caused or contributed to the need for the restatement;

the amount that would have been paid or payable to the executive officer would have been less if the financial results had been properly reported; and

our Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion that it is in our best interests and in the best interests of our shareholders to require the executive officer to repay or forfeit all or any portion of the amount paid or payable.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

In 2015 our Board of Directors approved amended stock ownership guidelines to further align the financial interests of our executive officers and Directors with those of our shareholders by encouraging the accumulation and retention of our common stock by our Directors and executive officers. The currentOur Board of Directors has approved the following amended stock ownership guidelines for our Directors and executive officers are as follows:officers:

 

Participants

 

Guidelines

 

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

 

LOGO

Six times annual base salary *

 Vice Chairman and President and

LOGO

Four times annual base salary

 Chief Operating Officer

 

LOGO

Four times annual base salary

Executive or Senior Vice Presidents

 

LOGO

Three times annual base salary        

 Other Executive Officers

LOGO

Two times annual base salary

Other executive officers Non-Management Directors

 

Two times annual base salary

Non-Management Directors

LOGO

 

Five times annual retainer

*

The Board approved an increase in the stock ownership guidelines applicable to our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer from five to six times annual base salary effective on August 15, 2019.

The recommended time period for achieving compliance with the guidelines is five years from election or appointment to the position that is subject to the guidelines. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews share ownership information with the Chief Executive Officer in August of each year to ensure compliance with the guidelines. As of June 30, 2019,2022, all executive officers and Directors in their positions for at least five years were in compliance with the guidelines.

STOCK OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONSStock Ownership Restrictions - SPECULATIVE TRANSACTIONS / HEDGINGSpeculative Transactions/Hedging

We maintain an insider trading policy that applies to all of our Directors, officers, employeesother team members and consultants. The insider trading policy prohibits those covered by the policy from engaging in speculative transactions with respect to Company securities that could lead to inadvertent violations of securities laws, such as short sales and acquiring exchange-traded options (including puts, calls and other derivatives). Furthermore, the insider trading policy prohibits certain arrangements that could result in sales or transfers of Company securities without the covered person’s consent at times at which he or she is not permitted to trade in Company securities, including holding Company securities in margin accounts or pledging them as collateral.

The insider trading policy also prohibits those covered by the policy from entering into hedging or monetization transactions (such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts) with respect to Company securities, because such transactions may provide ownership of Company securities without the full risks and rewards of such ownership.

Governance Documents

Our Global Code of Business Conduct, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and our Independence Standards for Directors are posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com. Shareholders may request copies of these documents, free of charge, by writing to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling (216) 896-3000. The information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement.

2022 Proxy Statement31


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—FISCAL YEAR 2019Compensation of Directors

Directors who are also our team members do not receive any additional compensation for their services as Directors. As a result, Thomas L. Williams and Lee C. Banks are not included in the table on page 33. During fiscal year 2022, non-employee Directors received an annual retainer, meeting fees (if applicable), and a restricted stock unit award. Our non-employee Directors are also eligible to participate in our Matching Gifts Program as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section on page 60 of this Proxy Statement. The following table reflects the annual retainers of the non-employee Directors effective during fiscal year 2022:

   Approved
August 15 and
September 7, 2018
      Approved
August 11, 2021
 
  Annual Retainers  Effective beginning
10/24/2018
      

Effective beginning

10/27/2021

 

Lead Director and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair:

   $200,000   

 

   $220,000 

Audit Committee Chair:

   $165,000   

 

   $180,000 

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair:

   $165,000   

 

   $180,000 

Non-Chair Committee members:

   $140,000   

 

   $150,000 

In addition to the annual retainers described above, non-employee Directors are entitled to receive a $2,000 fee for attending each Board of Directors or Committee meeting that exceeds the number of regularly scheduled Board or Committee meetings in a fiscal year by more than two. On that basis, in fiscal year 2022 each director received two additional payments of $2,000.

During fiscal year 2022, Directors could elect to defer all or a portion of their annual retainers under our Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.

Each Director who was serving as a Director on October 27, 2021 and who was not a current employee was granted 556 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan (as defined below). Ms. Evanko’s and Mr. Fritz’s pro-rated award of 547 RSUs granted upon their appointments to the Board in January 2021 vested on January 27, 2022; Mr. Lacey’s pro-rated award of 365 RSUs granted upon his appointment to the Board in April 2021 vested on April 22, 2022. The terms of the RSUs provide that the RSUs will vest 100% on the later of (a) one year from the grant date; or (b) on the date of our next Annual Shareholders Meeting, also known as, in each case, the Vesting Date, except that if a Director ceases to be a Director for any reason prior to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders that occurs after the grant date, a pro-rated portion of her or his RSUs will vest on the Vesting Date and the remaining RSUs will be forfeited. All RSUs earn dividend equivalent units paid as additional RSUs, which are subject to the terms and conditions of the original RSU award and are payable directly to each Director to whom they are issued.

32LOGO


Director Compensation

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022

The following table sets forth compensation information for our non-employee Directors for fiscal year 2022.

  Name  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)(1)
   All Other
Compensation
($)(2)
   

Total

($)

 

Jillian C. Evanko

   150,774    165,677    2,314    318,765 

Lance M. Fritz

   150,774    165,677    2,314    318,765 

Linda A. Harty

   179,161    165,677    1,704    346,542 

William F. Lacey

   150,774    165,677    2,577    319,028 

Kevin A. Lobo

   150,774    165,677    1,704    318,155 

Joseph Scaminace

   179,161    165,677    11,704    356,542 

Åke Svensson

   150,774    165,677    1,704    318,155 

Laura K. Thompson

   150,774    165,677    4,204    320,655 

James R. Verrier

   150,774    165,677    1,704    318,155 

James L. Wainscott

   217,548    165,677    11,704    394,929 

Candy M. Obourn

   45,161            45,161 

(1)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan in fiscal year 2022 and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amount was calculated using the closing stock price on the date of each of the grants. Each of the non-employee Directors serving as a Director on October 27, 2021 received 556 RSUs on his or her grant date. As of June 30, 2022, each non-employee Director, other than Ms. Obourn, held 556 RSUs, and none of the non-employee Directors held options or SARs.

(2)

The amounts reported in this column include (a) the value of the dividend equivalent units earned as additional RSUs on the unvested RSUs granted in fiscal year 2022 and in the case of Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz and William F. Lacey, the unvested RSUs granted in 2021, and (b) the following matching gifts under our Matching Gifts Program: Mr. Scaminace-$10,000; Ms. Thompson- $2,500; and Mr. Wainscott-$10,000. For more information regarding our Matching Gifts Program, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section on page 60 of this Proxy Statement.

2022 Proxy Statement33


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 2 – Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related SEC rules, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We encourage our shareholders to carefully read this Proxy Statement in its entirety before deciding whether or not to vote for or against this Item 2.

At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders voted in favor of annual frequency for the non-binding, advisory approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. The next non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers is expected to take place at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

As described in detail throughout our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, our executive compensation program features, among other things, the following:

A “pay-for-performance” structure which helps ensure that a significant portion of the compensation for our executive officers is “at-risk,” is dependent on the short-term and long-term performance of our business and encourages and rewards performance that drives the key goals, operational priorities and metrics that we use to profitably grow our business and enhance shareholder value;

A structure which helps ensure that our executive compensation program aligns the interests of our executive officers and our shareholders, is not overly weighted towards annual cash incentive compensation and does not otherwise have the potential to threaten long-term shareholder value by promoting unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by our executive officers;

A structure consistent with our philosophy of targeting executive compensation at market median, which allows us to remain competitive with companies that compete with us for talented team members and shareholder investment;

Various executive compensation practices that contribute to good corporate governance, including a “clawback” policy, stock ownership guidelines for Directors and executive officers, hedging, pledging and other stock ownership restrictions, and an annual compensation risk review; and

Effective oversight and decision-making by a highly-independent Board of Directors and a Human Resources and Compensation Committee consisting entirely of independent Directors that retains an independent executive compensation consultant.

The vote on this Item 2 is non-binding and advisory in nature, which means that the vote is not binding on us, our Board of Directors or any of the Committees of our Board of Directors. However, our Board of Directors values the views of our shareholders and our Board of Directors and Human Resources and Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into account when addressing future compensation policies and decisions.

Our Board of Directors believes that our executive compensation program is reasonable and well-structured, satisfies its objectives and philosophies and is worthy of shareholder support. Accordingly, our Board of Directors requests that our shareholders vote to approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussions, is approved on a non-binding, advisory basis.

    LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF
THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS.

34LOGO


Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Named Executive Officers

Our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 are:

Thomas L. Williams Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Todd M. Leombruno Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Lee C. Banks Vice Chairman and President

Jennifer A. Parmentier Chief Operating Officer

Andrew M. Weeks former Vice President and President - Engineered Materials Group

Executive Summary

Objectives and Philosophies of the Executive Compensation Program

The Win StrategyTM has been the foundation of our business and has represented the unified strategic vision of our employeesteam members worldwide since it was first introduced in 2001. The Win Strategy defines the key goals, operational priorities and metrics used to profitably grow our business. We are confident that our continuing focus on The Win Strategy maximizes long-term shareholder value by helping us realize our goal oftop-quartile performance among our competitors and peers and steady appreciation of our stock price.

The Win Strategy also provides the means by which we measure and reward success. In fact, the objective of our executive compensation program is to encourage and reward performance that implements the strategies and advances the goals of The Win Strategy. The program is designed to:

 

align the financial interests of our executive officers and our shareholders by encouraging and rewarding our executive officers for performance that achieves or exceeds significant financial and operational performance goals and by holding them accountable for results;

  LOGO   

Align the financial interests of our executive officers and our shareholders by encouraging and rewarding our executive officers for performance that achieves or exceeds significant financial and operational performance goals and by holding them accountable for results.

  LOGO

Encourage and reward our executive officers for experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership, leadership qualities, advancement, individual accomplishment and other significant contributions to the enhancement of shareholder value and to the success of our business.

  LOGO

Provide market competitive compensation to attract, retain and motivate highly-talented and ethical individuals at all levels who are focused on the long-term success of our business and who are equipped, motivated and poised to lead and manage our business presently and in the future.

  LOGO   

Promote accountability by providing executive officers a mix of cash and equity compensation, allocating a greater proportion of the compensation for executive officers, as compared to other team members, to elements that are dependent on the performance of our business.

  LOGO

Maintain a level of flexibility sufficient to adjust for trends and changes in the continuously evolving global business and regulatory environment.

 

2022 Proxy Statement35


encourage and reward our executive officers for experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership, leadership qualities, advancement, individual accomplishment and other significant contributions to the enhancement of shareholder value and to the success of our business;Executive Compensation

 

provide market competitive compensation to attract, retain and motivate highly-talented and ethical individuals at all levels who are focused on the long-term success of our business and who are equipped, motivated and poised to lead and manage our business presently and in the future;

 

promote accountability by providing executive officers a mix of cash and equity compensation, allocating a greater proportion of the compensation for executive officers, as compared to other employees, to elements that are dependent on the performance of our business; and2022 Executive Compensation Program

maintain a level of flexibility sufficient to adjust for trends and changes in the continuously evolving global business and regulatory environment.

Categories and Elements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program covers all compensation paid to our executive officers. OurIn fiscal year 2022 our executive officers include,included, among others, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019,2022, which we refer to as the Named Executive Officers.

Our executive compensation program offers the categories and elements of compensation identified in the following table. Each element of compensation is more specifically defined and described in the “Elements“Principal Elements of Executive Compensation” section beginning on the page indicated in the table.

 

  Category of CompensationElement(s) of Compensation

Defined/Described 

Beginning on: 

Base Salaries

Base Salaries    

Category of Compensation

Page 45 
 

Element(s) of Compensation

Defined/Described
Beginning on:

  Base Salaries

Base Salaries

Page 33

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

  

Target Incentive Bonuses

General RONA Bonuses

Converted RONA Bonuses

PGI Plan

Page 47 

 

  

General RONA BonusesPage 35

Page 36

Page 36

Page 39

48 

 

Converted RONA BonusesPage 48 

 

PGI PlanPage 50 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  

LTIP Awards

Stock Incentives

Restricted Stock Units

Page 51 

 

  

Stock IncentivesPage 40

Page 43

Page 44

53 

  Employee Benefits

 

  Restricted Stock UnitsPage 54 

Various

Employee Benefits

  

VariousPage 44

54 

Executive Perquisites

  

Various

 

Page 50

59 

“Pay-for-Performance”—Structure, Key Financial Metrics and Impact on Compensation

Our executive compensation program is structured to ensure that a significant portion of the compensation for executive officers is dependent upon the performance of our business. This“pay-for-performance” structure drives the program to achieve its objective to encourage and reward performance that implements the strategies and advances the goals of The Win Strategy. Our program is also structured to help ensure that the compensation for our executive officers is not overly weighted toward annual cash incentive compensation and does not otherwise have the potential to threaten long-term shareholder value by promoting unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by our executive officers. The “Allocation of Executive Compensation”“Compensation Setting Process” section describes our policies and practices for allocating executive compensation among the various categories and elements.

36LOGO


Executive Compensation

To illustrate, the following chart showsgraphics show the mix of fixed andat-risk annual and long-term cash and equity compensation represented by base salaries and the elements of annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation for the Named Executive Officers.Officers for fiscal year 2022 at target levels. The percentages of total target compensation reflected in this chart were calculated using each Named Executive Officer’s fiscal year 20192022 base salary, target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term incentive compensation.

compensation (as set in August 2021).

LOGO

LOGO

*

Rounded to the nearest percentage point.

The “Elements“Principal Elements of Executive Compensation” section provides detailed discussion and analysis regarding how each element of compensation encourages and rewards performance that implements the strategies and advances the goals of The Win Strategy. Our compensation structure includes both fixed andat-risk compensation comprised of various cash and equity elements, which is structured generally as follows:

 

 

LOGOLOGO

*

*

General RONA and Converted RONA, which are based on our return on net assets.

2022 Proxy Statement37


Executive Compensation

We provide base salaries, employee benefits and executive perquisites primarily to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive to attract, retain and motivate the individuals needed to implement and advance our strategies and goals. In addition, as illustrated in the following

table, we provide each element of annual cash incentive compensation and each element of long-term incentive compensation primarily to encourage and reward performance that implements and advances The Win Strategy, in particular, our strategies and goals relating to financial performance and profitable growth, aligning such elements with our performance in certain key financial metrics that we use to measure the overall performance of our business.

We also ensure that base salary adjustments consider performance and results in certain ESG-related metrics embedded in The Win Strategy, such as, among others, team member safety, engagement and inclusion. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee also recognizes the potential for incorporating ESG-related metrics into our incentive compensation plans and programs and will continue to consider and evaluate appropriate opportunities to do so within our executive compensation program.

The following table shows the behaviors, key financial metrics and fiscal year 20192022 results driven by each element ofat-risk compensation provided to the Named Executive Officers.

 

       
Element of Compensation  

Encourages executive

Element of Compensationofficers to maximize

By focusing on various

key business strategies, such as

Fiscal year 2022 results

LOGO     

 

    

Encourages executive officers to maximize...

 

 

By focusing on various key business strategies, such as...LOGO

 Fiscal year 2019 results...
LOGO

RONA Bonuses

(General and

Converted)

(cash)

  

RONA Bonuses (General and Converted)

(cash)

return on net assets

  

 

value pricing and strategic supply chain, market-driven innovation, system solutions and strong distribution channels

 

  

Our return on consolidated net assets was above target.

LOGO

 

Target Incentive Bonuses

Bonuses

(cash)

  

free cash flow

  

 

continuous improvement in net income, lean initiatives, inventory controls, collection of receivables, control of payables and capital expenditures, and the ability to finance dividends, acquisitions and product innovations

 

  

Our operating cash flows were $1.730$2.44 billion or 12.08%15.4% of sales, resulting in a free cash flow margin of 12.12%13.94%.*

 

Profitable Growth

Incentive Plan**

(cash)

  

sales growth (organic and through acquisitions)

  

profitable and sustainable sales growth

  

 

The Profitable Growth Incentive Plan multiplier was applied to Mr. Malone’s and Ms. Parmentier’sWeeks’ General RONA Bonus, with the effect of increasing both Mr. Malone’shis General RONA Bonus payout by approximately 30% and Ms. Parmentier’s General RONA Bonus by approximately 2%.

 

 LOGO   

LTIP Awards

(equity)

  

long-term sales growth, earnings per share growth, and growth in average return on invested capital

  

market-driven innovation,on-time delivery of quality products, value-added services and systems, strategic supply chain, lean enterprise, value pricing and profitable growth

  

 

Our results for average return on invested capital were between the median and top quartile performance levels, and our results for revenue growth and earnings per share growth were at top quartile, and our results for growth in average return on invested capital was between the median and top quartile performance levels, resulting in a payout at 183.52%186.66% of target.

 

 

Stock Incentives/Stock

Appreciation Rights

(SARs)

(equity)

  

 

LOGO

Stock Incentives/Restricted Stock Units

(equity)

our stock price

  

 

sustained profitable growth and financial and operational performance that contribute to appreciation of our stock price

 

  

 

Our average daily closing per share stock price was $167.99$294.14 in fiscal year 2019,2022, as compared to $177.39$260.14 in fiscal year 2018.2021.

 

*

Free cash flow margin is calculated as disclosed on page 47.

**

Officer participation in our Profitable Growth Incentive Plan is limited to our operating group presidents; as such, Mr. Weeks (Vice President and President—Engineered Materials Group) is the only Named Executive Officer who was eligible for the Profitable Growth Incentive Plan in fiscal year 2022.

 

* Free cash flow margin is calculated as disclosed on page 35
38LOGO

** Officer participation on


Executive Compensation

Compensation Practices

The following table highlights some of the key aspects of our Profitable Growth Incentive Plan is limited to our operating group presidents; as such, Mr. Malone (Vice President and President—Filtration Group) and Ms. Parmentier (Vice President and President—Motion Systems Group) are the only Named Executive Officers who were eligibleexecutive compensation program for the Profitable Growth Incentive Plan in fiscal year 2019.

ADMINISTRATION, OVERSIGHTAND DETERMINATIONOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee, which we refer2022. This table is not a substitute for, nor does it purport to include, all of the information provided in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis asand the Committee, consists solely of independent Directors and has various duties and responsibilities with respect to the administration, oversight and determination of executive compensation. As describedCompensation Tables presented later in the Committee’s Charter, which is posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com, these duties and responsibilities include:this Proxy Statement.

 

establishing our executive compensation program and philosophies and overseeing their development and implementation;

LOGO   What We DoLOGO   What We Don’t Do

LOGO   Executive compensation program with pay-for-performance structure aligned with The Win Strategy

LOGO   The target total direct compensation package for our Chief Executive Officer is a mix of 9% fixed and 91% at-risk, and for our other Named Executive Officers is an average mix of 18% fixed and 82% at-risk

LOGO   Annual advisory vote on executive compensation with consistent high degree of approval

LOGO   One-year minimum vesting or performance period requirements for equity incentives under our Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

LOGO   “Claw back” policy to recover or withhold incentive-based compensation to executive officers in certain circumstances

LOGO   Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy for Directors and executive officers

LOGO   Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines for executive Officers and Directors

LOGO   Offer employment agreements to our executives

LOGO   Offer above-market earnings on contributions to deferred compensation accounts

LOGO   Grant stock options or SARs with an exercise price less than the fair market value of Parker’s common stock on the date of grant

LOGO   Re-price stock options or SARs

LOGO   Cash out underwater stock options or SARs

LOGO   Include reload provisions in any stock option or SAR grant

LOGO   Permit directors or employees, or their respective related persons, to engage in short sales of Parker’s stock or to trade in instruments designed to hedge against price declines in Parker’s stock

LOGO   Permit directors or officers to hold Parker securities in margin accounts or to pledge Parker securities as collateral for loans or other obligations

 

reviewing and approving the performance and compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; and

performing other duties and responsibilities assigned by our Board of Directors.

The Committee also retains the discretion to authorize periodic compensation adjustments due to promotions or increases in the responsibilities of our executive officers.

In fulfilling its duties and responsibilities, the Committee seeks periodic input, advice and recommendations from various sources, including our Board of Directors, our executive officers and the Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant. The Committee is not bound by that input or advice or those recommendations. The Committee at all times exercises independent discretion in its executive compensation decisions.

Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors approves all incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans reviewed and recommended by the Committee and all other plans and programs which, by their terms, require approval of our Board. Our Board does not authorize or approve any other specific executive compensation matters. Our Board of Directors oversees the Committee’s activities and performance, including the identification, evaluation and monitoring of risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, and reviews all material information relating to executive compensation matters approved by the Committee. This oversight ensures that the Committee fulfills its duties and responsibilities and that the executive compensation program is reasonable and appropriate, meets its objectives and effectively serves the interests of our business and our shareholders.

Executive Officers

Our executive officers also play a role in the administration, oversight and determination of executive compensation. At the beginning of each fiscal year, each executive officer sets annual performance goals for his or her direct reports, which may include other executive officers. The performance goals are designed to promote individual performance consistent with the strategies and goals of The Win Strategy. Throughout the fiscal year, each executive officer’s performance is reviewed and evaluated against his or her performance goals. At the end of the fiscal year, each executive officer conducts a final performance review for each of his or her direct reports. Based on those reviews, our executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, recommend any annual compensation adjustments and awards for their executive officer direct reports to our Chief Executive Officer.

Our Chief Executive Officer similarly reviews and evaluates his direct reports, which include each of the other Named Executive Officers except for Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier who are reviewed

2022 Proxy Statement39


Executive Compensation

Compensation Setting Process

Roles and evaluated by Mr. Banks. Responsibilities

THE HUMAN

RESOURCES AND

COMPENSATION

COMMITTEE

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee, which we refer to in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as the Committee, consists solely of independent Directors and has various duties and responsibilities with respect to the administration, oversight and determination of executive compensation. As described in the Committee’s Charter, which is posted and available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com, these duties and responsibilities include:

   establishing our executive compensation program and philosophies and overseeing their development and implementation;

   reviewing and approving the performance and compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; and

   overseeing and evaluating any significant risks arising from our compensation policies and practices.

To assist in its risk oversight duties and responsibilities, the Committee ensures management and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant conduct an annual compensation risk review. The results of this review are evaluated and discussed among management, the Committee and its independent executive compensation consultant and, if any significant risks are identified, the full Board of Directors. Based on the review conducted during fiscal year 2022, we believe that our current compensation policies and practices are designed to mitigate risks related to compensation, and such policies and practices do not create risks that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.

The Committee also retains the discretion to authorize periodic compensation adjustments due to promotions or increases in the responsibilities of our executive officers.

In fulfilling its duties and responsibilities, the Committee seeks periodic input, advice and recommendations from various sources, including our Board of Directors, our executive officers and the Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant. The Committee is not bound by that input or advice or those recommendations. The Committee at all times exercises independent discretion in its executive compensation decisions. The Committee may, in its discretion, create subcommittees of its members and delegate to them any of its duties and responsibilities. It may also delegate certain authority to management with respect to our benefit plans, but it may not so delegate approval of executive officer compensation, stock plan design, director compensation, or change in control plans and agreements.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors approves all plans and programs which, by their terms, require approval of our Board. Our Board does not authorize or approve any other specific executive compensation matters. Our Board oversees the Committee’s activities and performance, including the identification, evaluation and monitoring of risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, and reviews all material information relating to executive compensation matters approved by the Committee. This oversight helps ensure that the Committee fulfills its duties and responsibilities and that the executive compensation program is reasonable and appropriate, meets its objectives and effectively serves the interests of our business and our shareholders.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers also play a role in the administration, oversight and determination of executive compensation. At the beginning of each fiscal year, each executive officer sets annual performance goals for his or her direct reports, which may include other executive officers. The performance goals are designed to promote individual performance consistent with the strategies and goals of The Win Strategy. Throughout the fiscal year, each executive officer’s performance is reviewed and evaluated against his or her performance goals. At the end of the fiscal year, each executive officer conducts a final performance review for each of his or her direct reports. Based on those reviews, our executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, recommend any annual compensation adjustments and awards for their executive officer direct reports to our Chief Executive Officer.

Our Chief Executive Officer similarly reviews and evaluates his direct reports, which include each of the other Named Executive Officers except for Mr. Weeks who was reviewed and evaluated by Ms. Parmentier. Our Chief Executive Officer also reviews and evaluates the recommendations made with respect to all of our other executive officers and makes any modifications that he deems appropriate. Our Chief Executive Officer then recommends to the Committee annual compensation adjustments and awards for all of our executive officers other than himself.

Our Chief Executive Officer, Vice Chairman and President, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President–Human Resources & External Affairs and our Secretary attend all meetings of the Committee other than executive sessions. None of these officers attend discussions regarding their individual compensation. Our executive officers prepare and provide to the Committee performance summaries for certain executive officers, which are used by the Committee to understand and measure the performance and effectiveness of our annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. Our executive officers also periodically consult with and assist the Committee in calculating incentive compensation payouts, establishing and monitoring performance goals and addressing other appropriate executive compensation matters.

40LOGO


Executive Officer also reviewsCompensation

Compensation Consultants and evaluates the recommendations made with respect to all of our other executive officers and makes any modifications that he deems appropriate. Our Chief Executive Officer then recommends to the Committee annual compensation adjustments and awards for all of our executive officers other than himself.

Our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Operating Officer, our Executive Vice President—Human Resources & External Affairs and our Secretary attend all meetings of the Committee other than executive sessions, and neither our Chief Executive Officer nor our Chief Operating Officer attends any meetings relating to his performance or compensation. Our executive officers prepare and provide to the Committee performance summaries for certain executive officers, which are used by the Committee to understand and measure the performance and effectiveness of our annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. Our executive officers also periodically consult with and assist the Committee in calculating incentive compensation payouts, establishing and monitoring performance goals and addressing other appropriate executive compensation matters.

COMPENSATION CONSULTANTSAND BENCHMARKINGBenchmarking

The Committee regularly monitors, reviews and evaluates our executive compensation program to help ensure that it provides reasonable compensation ranges at competitive, appropriate and effective levels. The Committee engages Mercer Human Resource Consulting, an independent human resources and compensation consulting firm, which we refer to as Mercer, to assist the Committee in its monitoring, review and evaluation responsibilities, and to otherwise provide assistance and guidance to the Committee on executive officer and Director compensation matters. Mercer is a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. The Committee first engaged Mercer in fiscal year 2009 following a robust procurement process involving multiple consulting firms. The Committee selected Mercer based on its level of expertise and financial and strategic fit. Mercer reports directly to the Committee and attends all meetings of the Committee. The Committee has sole authority for the appointment, removal, replacement, compensation and oversight of Mercer and its affiliates for executive officer and Director compensation matters.

Mercer provides a wide range of executive officer and Director compensation consulting services for the Committee. Mercer prepares and provides to the Committee a comprehensive annual review of base salaries, target annual cash incentive compensation, target long-term incentive compensation and target total cash and direct compensation for all of our executive officers. Mercer uses this annual review to advise the Committee with respect to the effectiveness and competitiveness of our executive compensation program. The Committee considers this annual review when establishing compensation levels and otherwise to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive and effective.

Mercer uses proxy statement data and surveys published by leading human resources and compensation consultants to conduct market analyses of base salaries, target annual bonuses,cash incentive compensation, target long-term incentive compensation and target total cash and direct compensation offered to executives of other diversified industrial companies with revenues and market values comparable to ours, which we refer to as the Peer Group or Peer Group companies. Mercer also uses broader market data on companies outside of the Peer Group to the extent that it is available and appropriate.

The Committee regularly reviews and, when necessary or advisable, updates the Peer Group to make sure it consists of companies that directly compete with us for talented employeesteam members and shareholder investment, and it otherwise represents a meaningful group of peers. In evaluating the Peer Group companies, the Committee looks for companies in the Diversified Industrials sector with

characteristics and business strategies similar to ours. The Peer Group companies for fiscal year 20192022 remained the same as fiscal year 20182021 and consisted of the following companies:

 

Peer Group Companies

   Caterpillar Inc.

   Colfax Corporation(1)

   Cummins Inc.

   Danaher Corporation

   Deere & Company

   Dover Corporation

  

   Eaton Corporation plc

   Ingersoll-Rand plc

•   Colfax Corporation

   Emerson Electric Co.

   ITT Corporation

•   Cummins Inc.

   Flowserve Corporation

   Johnson Controls International plc

•   Danaher Corporation

   Fortive Corporation

   Rockwell Automation, Inc.

•   Deere & Company

   Honeywell International Inc.

   SPX Flow, Inc.

•   Dover Corporation

   Illinois Tool Works Inc.

  

   Ingersoll Rand Inc.

   ITT Inc.

   Johnson Controls International plc

   Rockwell Automation, Inc.

   Textron Inc.

   Trane Technologies plc

(1)

Colfax Corporation became Enovis Corporation in April 2022

Mercer also provided other compensation consulting services to the Committee during fiscal year 2019,2022, including:

 

preparing for and participating in the Committee’s meetings and conference calls, including advance and subsequent meetings with the chair of the Committee and senior management;

 

conducting apay-for-performance review to evaluate the level of alignment between our executive compensation program and performance levels relative to our Peer Group companies;

 

preparing and providing to the Committee a comprehensive review of compensation provided to ournon-management Directors;

 

assessing our free-cash flow performance versus peers over a one, three and five-year period;

 

working with management to conduct the annual compensation risk review; and

 

periodically assisting management on other select executive compensation topics.

2022 Proxy Statement41


Executive Compensation

In fiscal year 2019,2022, we paid $232,945$212,473 in fees, administrative charges,out-of-pocket expenses and other costs to Mercer for executive officer and Director compensation consulting services provided to the Committee.

We also directly engage Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its affiliates (including Mercer) in the ordinary course of business, without the approval of our Board of Directors or the Committee, to provide services in areas other than executive officer and Director compensation. These additional services included:

 

consulting services regarding life insurance, prescription drug and other benefits programs for our employeesteam members generally;

 

consulting services regarding investment options available under our benefit plans for our employeesteam members generally;

 

providing benchmarking surveys for information on compensation and benefits for our employeesteam members generally; and

 

providing services as an insurance broker.

In fiscal year 2019,2022, we paid $1,242,045$745,898 in fees, administrative charges, commissions,out-of-pocket expenses and other costs to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its affiliates (including Mercer) for these additional services. The majority of these fees were not paid pursuant to

engagements of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. by management, but were rather either paid by our third-party administrators to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. relating to risk insurance and for insurance and prescription drug services provided under our employeeteam member health and welfare plans, or were direct engagements with Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. made by various divisions worldwide for market surveys related to those particular divisions. The consolidated revenues of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. were $14.95$19.82 billion as reported in its Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

The Committee has considered and assessed all relevant factors, including but not limited to those set forth in Rule10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to Mercer. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflict of interest that has been raised by the work performed by Mercer. The Committee also periodically reviews the relationship with Mercer to determine whether sufficient internal safeguards are in place to ensure that Mercer provides services to the Committee independent of any influence from management. The Committee identified the following safeguards:

 

Mercer reports directly to the Committee and not to management on executive officer and Director compensation matters;

 

at each Committee meeting, Mercer and the Committee meet in executive session without members of management present;

 

allnon-executive compensation services are provided by Mercer consultants who are not involved in providing executive officer and Director compensation consulting services to the Committee;

 

the Committee has exclusive authority to retain and set the compensation for Mercer’s executive officer and Director compensation consulting services;

 

the individual Mercer consultants to the Committee do not provide any services to us other than those provided for the Committee;

 

the individual Mercer consultants to the Committee do not participate in any client development activities that are not directly related to executive officer or Director compensation services for the Committee; and

 

the amounts paid to Mercer by the Committee are not directly impacted by any growth in the fees we pay to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its affiliates (including Mercer).

GENERAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

42LOGO


Executive Compensation

Consideration of 2021 Say-on-Pay Vote

At our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we received approval, based on the total votes cast, for our advisory “say-on-pay” vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Committee and Mercer specifically considered the voting results when exploring potential changes to our executive compensation program in fiscal year 2022. The Committee believes the voting results demonstrate strong, consistent support for our executive compensation program. The Committee will continue to explore with Mercer potential improvements to our executive compensation program to the extent appropriate to keep our executive compensation program aligned with best practices in our competitive market.

General Policies and Practices Relating to Executive Compensation

Allocation of Executive Compensation

The Committee seeks to provide compensation, employee benefits and executive perquisites which are competitive with the market and help us attract, retain and motivate present and future executive officers. Annually, base salaries, target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term incentive compensation for each executive officer is compared to the median of companies included in Mercer’s annual review with the objective that, in the aggregate, our target compensation remains generally remains ataligned with the median of the Peer Group companies.

When deciding whether to increase or decrease the amount of any element of compensation, the Committee considers Mercer’s annual review, the annual performance reviews of the executive officers and the performance of our business as a whole. The Committee does not consider amounts realized from prior compensation in determining the levels of compensation paid to executive officers.

To ensure that our executive compensation program meets its objectives to drive and support The Win Strategy, the Committee allocates the majority of compensation for executive officers to annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. Each of theat-risk elements of compensation within those categories is directly tied to appreciation of our stock price and/or to significant financial and operational performance goals. More thanone-half of the targeted total compensation for the executive officers is, therefore, “at risk”“at-risk” and may significantly fluctuate from year to year based on our financial, operational and stock performance. In addition, the Committee makes sure that executive officers have a greater proportion of their total compensation allocated to theseat-risk elements than other employees.team members. The Committee structures the program in this manner to better align the financial interests of our executive officers with the financial interests of our shareholders, to better ensure a“pay-for-performance” “pay-for-performance” result and to promote internal equity by recognizing that our executive officers, as compared to other employees,team members, have greater responsibility and influence over the performance of our business.

2022 Proxy Statement43


Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program is also structured to offer a reasonable balance of annual and long-term, as well as cash and equity, elements of compensation. The program provides a mix of those elements specifically designed to encourage and reward performance that contributes to the advancement of The Win Strategy. The Committee does not have any formal policies or guidelines with respect to the allocation of executive compensation between annual and long-term elements, cash and equity elements or different forms of equity elements. In practice, however, the Committee has taken the following approaches.

 

 

Allocation between annual and long-term elementselements. . The Committee considers Mercer’s annual review as it sets each executive officer’s base salary and annual cash incentive compensation to ensure that it is reasonable in the context of the midpoint value of his or her comparable position within the Peer Group. The Committee also considers Mercer’s annual review as it sets the total target value of each executive officer’s long-term incentive compensation as a multiple of the midpoint of the base salary range of his or her comparable position within the Peer Group companies.

 

 

Allocation between cash and equity elementselements. . Base salaries and annual cash incentive compensation are paid in cash. Long-term incentive compensation is generally paid in equity because of the long-term nature of equity awards and our desire to encourage performance that drives long-term shareholder value.

 

 

Allocation between different forms of equity elementselements. . The Committee generally allocates 50% of the total target value of each executive officer’s long-term incentive compensation to LTIP Awards and 50% to Stock Incentives. The Committee takes this approach to balance the allocation between elements based on long-term financial, operational and strategic metrics and those based on long-term performance of our common stock.

The Committee generally makes all elements of executive compensation available to all executive officers and makes executive compensation decisions on a consistent and equitable basis. The Committee generally does not offer any element to an executive officer that is not available to other executive officers. As described beginning on page 39,50, however, the PG RONA Multiplier is applied only to our operating group presidents, and, therefore, Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier areWeeks is our only Named Executive OfficersOfficer to whom the PG RONA Multiplier was applied in fiscal year 2019.2022. The Committee also occasionally grants retention and/or recognition awards to executive officers who make extraordinary contributions to the Company’s success, or for whom a retention incentive is appropriate.

Accounting and Tax Considerations

Our executive compensation program is structured to achieve flexibility, maximize benefits and minimize detriments to our business and our executive officers from a tax and accounting perspective. As a result, we continuously review and evaluate the impact of changes in tax laws and accounting practices and interpretations and similar factors affecting our executive compensation program. For example, Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718, which results in recognition of compensation expense for Stock Incentives, and Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which impacts deferred compensation arrangements, are considered as we evaluate structure and implement changes to the program.

In addition, our executive compensation program has historically been designed to allow us to deduct compensation payments for tax purposes. For example, while the Committee believes that tax deduction is only one of several relevant considerations in setting compensation, the Committee generally tried to make sure that annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation qualified as fully deductible “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted December 22, 2017, included a number of significant changes to Section 162(m), such as the repeal of the “performance-based” compensation exemption and the expansion of the definition of “covered employees” (for example, by including the chief financial officer as a covered employee). As a result of these changes, compensation to each Named Executive Officer in excess of $1,000,000 generally will no longer be tax deductible. In addition, each Named Executive Officer will be subject to the limit under Section 162(m) for all future tax years. We will continue to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) to the extent to which our outstanding awards are determined to be tax deductible under the transitional relief; however, there are still uncertainties regarding the scope of transitional relief available. The Committee may also determine that certain good governance practices of Section 162(m) should remain in place, such as establishing performance goals within the first ninety days of a performance period, selecting performance goals that are set forth in our 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and requiring the Committee to certify results prior to the payout of any award. The Committee, however, reserves the right to modify any compensation program if it determines that such modification is consistent with our business needs.

Committee Discretion

The Committee does not change thepre-determined performance goals or increase the amount of anyat-risk compensation following the grant date except as permitted by applicable laws and regulations. The Committee may increase the amount of any award of annual cash incentive compensation made outside of the Performance Bonus Plan if appropriate to account for corporate policy changes, executive compensation program changes and major corporate programs, and to account for the negative impact of acquisitions on goodwill and amortization expense, losses on dispositions of real property during plant moves or shutdowns and other unexpected occurrences that negatively impact awards. The Committee has historically exercised this discretion only with respect to General RONA Bonuses (to encourage our employees to engage in activities and initiatives that drive and support The Win Strategy but may have an adverse impact on General RONA Bonuses), and once used such discretion with respect to Target Incentive Bonuses.

The Committee may reduce the amount of any award of annual cash incentive compensation or long-term incentive compensation made outside ofto the Performance Bonus PlanNamed Executive Officers other than Stock Incentives. The Committee also has the discretion to reduce the amount of any award made under the Performance Bonus Plan as long as the award, if eligible for such treatment, continues to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m). The Committee retains this downward discretion for the following purposes:

 

to ensure greater control over final performance-based compensation amounts based on its assessment of the quality of our results relative to our various performance measures, the risks taken to attain those results and our overall financial performance;

 

to help ensure that performance-based compensation continues to effectively serve the interests of our business and our shareholders; and

 

to avoid inappropriately rewarding executive officers based on events or circumstances that were not expected at the beginning of the performance period.

The Committee has historically exercised this downward discretion with respect to General RONA Bonuses awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and certain other executive officers. At the beginning of the year, the Committee determines for each of these executive officers a General RONA Bonus award opportunity that is large enough to ensure that we meet our objectives for annual cash incentive compensation and, at the same time, preserve the ability of the Committee to exercise its discretion to reduce the amount of the award payout to an appropriate level as compared to the final payouts made to executive officers who receive annual cash incentive compensation outside the Performance Bonus Plan and after taking into account individual performance and contributions to the success of our business. In addition, our calculation methodology for LTIP Award payouts also allows the Committee to exercise this discretion with respect to LTIP Award payouts.

ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

44LOGO

Our


Executive Compensation

Compensation Risk Review

The annual compensation risk review, first described on page 40, begins with a global assessment of any plans or programs that could potentially encourage excessive risk-taking or otherwise present significant risks to our business. The review also takes into account our individual business units to determine whether any of them carries a significant portion of our risk profile, structures compensation significantly different than others or is significantly more profitable than others.

The review then evaluates whether the applicable plans and programs are likely to encourage excessive risk-taking or detrimental behavior, vary significantly from our risk-reward structure, or otherwise present significant risks to our business.

During our fiscal year 2022 compensation risk review, we also identified and evaluated various mechanisms that we currently have in place that may serve to mitigate any existing or potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices, including the following:

our executive officers and other management-level team members are compensated with a mix of annual and long-term incentives, fixed and at-riskcompensation, program providescash and multiple forms of equity compensation;

compensation packages gradually become more focused on long-term, at-risk and equity compensation as our team members ascend to and through management-level positions;

our global compensation plans and programs generally utilize the Named Executive Officers with thesame or substantially similar performance measures;

we use multiple performance measures to determine payout levels under certain elements of incentive compensation described below. All of these elements are designed to contributeand different performance measures for our annual incentives as compared to our continuing effortlong-term incentives;

the performance of our team members is not evaluated or measured based solely on changes in our stock price;

our incentive compensation programs generally limit payouts to achievea specified maximum, while those that do not are mitigated by other factors (e.g., stock appreciation rights are mitigated by long-term vesting periods and stock ownership guidelines);

we do not offer “guaranteed” bonuses and all of our incentive compensation elements carry downside risk for participants;

our executive officers are subject to specific stock ownership guidelines, a “clawback” policy and provisions requiring forfeiture of certain elements of incentive compensation under certain circumstances;

our compensation packages, including severance packages and supplemental pensions, are within market ranges;

the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has the discretion to assess the quality of our results in relation to our various performance measures and the risks taken to attain those results in approving final incentive payouts;

our decentralized organizational structure lessens the impact of any excessive risks taken by individual business units or operating groups; and

our team members are evaluated, measured and assessed based on their compliance with our Global Code of Business Conduct and other internal policies and controls, and the extent to which they act in the best interests of our business and our shareholders.

During the annual compensation risk review, we also consider whether any changes to our compensation plans and programs may be necessary to further mitigate risk. While no changes to our compensation plans and programs were made as a result of the fiscal year 2022 compensation risk review, a new Officer Annual Cash Incentive Plan was implemented for fiscal year 2023 and changes were made to the performance metric weighting of our top-quartile2022-23-24 performance amongLTIP awards (as compared to our peers2021-22-23 LTIP awards) as further discussed in this Compensation Discussion and encourage behavior that promotes long-term value creation for our shareholders within the frameworkAnalysis section.

Principal Elements of The Win Strategy.Executive Compensation

Base Salaries

Each of the Named Executive Officers receives an annual base salary to:

 

encourage and reward attainment of individual performance goals established during the annual performance review process;

recognize experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership, leadership qualities, advancement, individual accomplishment and other significant contributions to the enhancement of shareholder value and the success of our business; and

 

attract, retain and motivate the highly-talented and values-driven individuals we need to advance the goals of The Win Strategy.

2022 Proxy Statement45


Executive Compensation

The Committee establishes a base salary range for each Named Executive Officer by using Mercer’s annual review to analyze base salaries of persons holding comparable positions within the Peer Group companies. The Committee determines the base salary for each Named Executive Officer for the next fiscal year based on the Named Executive Officer’s annual performance review, and compares the amount to the applicable market range to make sure that it is reasonable. Among other matters, annual performance reviews and base salary adjustments consider performance and results aligned with The Win Strategy, including in certain of its ESG-related metrics such as, among others, team member safety, engagement and inclusion. The Committee may increase base salaries, where appropriate, periodically throughout the fiscal year based on the results of interim performance reviews. The Committee generally tries to target base salary amounts at approximately the median of the Peer Group companies. During

In fiscal year 2019,2022, base salaries for the Named Executive Officers receivedwere generally increased in the range of approximately 5.5% to 7.5% for officers remaining in their same role year over year in consideration of the factors described above and to better align with the Peer Group median for similarly situated persons at our Peer Group companies. The table below reflects the base salaries as approved by the Committee in fiscal year 2022 as well as the total base salary actually paid to each of the Named Executive Officers as of June 30, 2022, which is also included in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

  Base Salaries

  Named Executive Officers  

FY2022

Base Salary ($)(1)

   

FY2022

Base Salary ($) (Actual)

 

Thomas L. Williams

   $1,400,000    $1,387,500 

Todd M. Leombruno(2)

   $720,000    $736,667 

Lee C. Banks

   $1,125,000    $1,112,500 

Jennifer A. Parmentier(3)

   $750,000    $765,423 

Andrew M. Weeks

   $643,300    $636,283 

(1)

Base salaries as set in August 2021 and effective September 1, 2021.

(2)

Mr. Leombruno’s annual base salary was increased to $720,000 effective September 1, 2021 and he received a mid-year increase to $780,000 effective February 1, 2022.

(3)

Ms. Parmentier was promoted to Chief Operating Officer effective August 9, 2021. Her annual base salary effective on that date was $750,000. She received a mid-year increase to $820,000 effective February 1, 2022.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

Our executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation based onpre-determined financial and growth objectives that are dependent on free cash flow margin, return on net assets and revenue growth. This category of compensation consists of three specific elements, which we refer to as Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses, and Converted RONA Bonuses. All of the Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses. As described beginning on page 39,50, Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier areWeeks is the only Named Executive OfficersOfficer whose General RONA Bonus is subject to the application of our Profitable Growth Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the PGI Plan.

The Committee allocates a significant portion of the total cash compensation for executive officers to annual cash incentive compensation, which is wholly dependent on achievingpre-determined financial and operational goals. At the beginning of fiscal year 2019,2022, Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses, in the aggregate at target, represented the following percentages of base salary for each of our Named Executive Officers:Officers, which percentages remained consistent with target aggregate percentages for fiscal year 2021 for officers serving in the same role year over year:

 

Target Percentage of Base Salary

  Named Executive Officer

 

  Named Executive Officers

Target Incentive Bonuses

General RONA Bonuses(1) and


Converted RONA Bonuses

Thomas L. Williams

  

156%

161%

  Catherine A. SueverTodd M. Leombruno

  

  92%

96%

Lee C. Banks

  

108%

107%

  Robert W. MaloneJennifer A. Parmentier

  

  74%

108%

  Jennifer A. Parmentier

Andrew M. Weeks

  

74%

 

(1)

Because General RONA Bonuses are calculated based on actual base salary received during the fiscal year the mid-year increases in salary for Mr. Leombruno and Ms. Parmentier had an impact on General RONA bonus payouts.

46LOGO


Executive Compensation

The Committeepre-determines the performance measures applicable to each element by analyzing our annual goals and objectives for each performance measure and, for Target Incentive Bonuses, Mercer’s annual review. The Committee directly and materially links annual cash incentive compensation to performance that drives and supports The Win Strategy.

Target Incentive Bonuses

During fiscal year 2019,2022, the Named Executive Officers received annual cash incentive compensation based on our free cash flow margin, which we refer to as Target Incentive Bonuses. Free cash flow margin is calculated as the percentage of sales represented by actual operating cash flow less capital expenditures, excluding any discretionary pension contributions made during the fiscal year.

The Committee identified free cash flow margin as a performance measure critical to the profitable growth and financial performance goals of The Win Strategy. Maximizing free cash flow allows us to continue to pay annual dividends, strategically acquire our outstanding shares, and reinvest in our business by funding innovation and financing growth through acquisitions of businesses and technologies. Target Incentive Bonuses encourage executive officers to maximize free cash flow by increasing net income, implementing lean initiatives, controlling inventory, collecting receivables, controlling accounts payable, and optimizing capital expenditures. We have also identified a strong correlation between increases in free cash flow and increases in operating earnings.

Target Incentive Bonuses are designed to directly reward executive officers for free cash flow margin performance against our annual plan and the performance of the Peer Group. Specifically, the Committee determines the target award opportunity for each of the executive officers and establishes the levels of performance for threshold, target and maximum payouts after evaluating our annual plan for free cash flow margin and theone-year, three-year and five-year average free cash flow margin within the Peer Group. Based on this data, the Committee estimated that 5.5%, 8.5%10% and 11.5%14.5% free cash flow margins would represent bottom-quartile, median andtop-quartile free cash flow margin results, respectively, within the Peer Group companies during fiscal year 2019.2022. After review and consideration of such data and our annual plan for free cash flow margin, the Committee increased the free cash flow top-quartile and median payout thresholds for our Target Incentive Bonuses infrom fiscal year 2019 from 5.0%2021 levels of 12.5% and 9%, respectively, to 5.5%14.5% and 10%, respectively, for a 50% payout, 8.0% to 8.5% for a 100% payout,fiscal year 2022, and 11% to 11.5% for a 200% payout.kept the bottom quartile threshold the same as fiscal year 2021 at 5.5%.

The following table illustrates how final fiscal year 20192022 Target Incentive Bonus amounts would be calculated:

 

     
FY19 Free Cash Flow Margin:  

Less than

5.5%

  5.5%  8.5%  

Greater than or equal  

to 11.5%  

Payout %

  

0%

  

50%

  

100%

  

200%

Below Threshold        

     

Threshold

     Target     

Maximum

      

    Actual Free Cash Flow Margin: 13.94%

    Actual Payment 187.56%

 
          

 

  FY2022 Free Cash Flow Margin  

 

 

                                     

                                                                                                                    
 

 

 

Less than

5.5%

  

 

 5.5%  

 

  10%  

 

 14.5%  

 

Payout%

 0%  

 

 50%  

 

  100%  

 

 200%  

 

This table illustrates that each recipient of a Target Incentive Bonus would receive ayear-end payout of 100% of his or her target award if our free cash flow margin for fiscal year 20192022 was 8.5%10.0% and a maximum payout of 200% of his or her target award if our free cash flow margin was greater than or equal to 11.5%14.5%, representingtop-quartile free cash flow margin. This table also illustrates that no Target Incentive Bonuses would be paid if our free cash flow margin for fiscal year 20192022 was less than 5.5%. The payout percentage that is applied is interpolated on a linear basis between the points in the above table.

In consideration of the foregoing, at the beginning of fiscal year 2019,2022, the Committee approved the following Target Incentive Bonuses in the table below for each of the Named Executive Officers:

Named Executive Officer   Target Awards—Target   
Incentive Bonuses

Thomas L. Williams

$812,500

Catherine A. Suever

$300,300

Lee C. Banks

$450,000

Robert W. Malone

$151,300

Jennifer A. Parmentier*

$137,900

*

Ms. Parmentier received a Target Incentive Bonus award of $131,900 at the beginning of fiscal year 2019, with an adjusted Target Incentive Bonus award of $146,300, effective February 1, 2019 due to her promotion to Vice President and President – Motion Systems Group. Ms. Parmentier’spro-rata target award is $137,900.

Officers. Our actual free cash flow margin for fiscal year 20192022 was 12.12%13.94% (calculated by taking the difference of fiscal year 20192022 cash flow from operating activities of $1,730,140,000$2,441,730,000 less fiscal year 20192022 capital expenditures of $195,089,000, plus a $200,000,000 discretionary pension contribution,$230,044,000 and dividing the result by fiscal year 20192022 net sales of $14,320,324,000)$15,861,608,000). Accordingly, each of the Named Executive Officers received 200%187.56% of their Target Incentive Bonus award. These amounts are shown in the table below and are included in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

  Named Executive Officer  Target Incentive Bonus ($)   Actual Target Incentive Bonus Amount ($) 

Thomas L. Williams

   980,000    1,838,088 

Todd M. Leombruno

   288,000    540,173 

Lee C. Banks

   506,300    949,616 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

   337,500    633,015 

Andrew M. Weeks

   160,800    301,596 

2022 Proxy Statement47


Executive Compensation

Target Incentive Bonuses are paid in one lump sum in August for each executive officer whose Target Incentive Bonus is awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan, and are paid in three installments in March, June and August for all other executive officers. The March and June payments are estimated based onyear-to-date results, and the August payment represents the balance of the Target Incentive Bonus payable based on the actual results for the entire fiscal year. We generally hold back 25% of theyear-to-date estimate from each March and June payment to ensure that we have the flexibility to reconcile the August payments to finalyear-end results. All payments are made in cash, except that the August payment may, at the election of the recipient, be deferred as a credit to the recipient’s account under the Executive Deferral Plan, which we describe in the section,“Non-Qualified Benefit Plans”.

General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses

During fiscal year 2019,2022, each of the Named Executive Officers was eligible for, and received, annual cash incentive compensation based on our return on net assets, which we refer to as General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses. The Committee awards General RONA Bonuses to our executive officers to encourage and reward performance which maximizes our returns on net assets. The Committee awards Converted RONA Bonuses to our executive officers in place of certain executive perquisites.

The performance measures used to determine payouts on General RONA Bonuses are as follows:

 

for executive officers who receive General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan, return on consolidated net assets;

for executive officers who are operating group presidents and do not receive General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan or who are not Executive Vice Presidents, return on average division net assets for divisions in the applicable operating group; and

 

for all other executive officers, return on average net assets for all divisions.

The performance measure used to determine the amount of the payouts on Converted RONA Bonuses is the return on average net assets for all of our divisions.

Return on net assets is calculated by dividing earnings(year-to-date segment operating income) by average assets (average of inventory, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangibles, less trade accounts payable and contract reserves,reserves), at the beginning of the fiscal year and at the end of each applicable quarter.

The Committee identified return on net assets as a performance measure critical to the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy. The Committee uses General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses to encourage executive officers and other employeesteam members to increase segment operating income and control net average assets by reducing investments in assets and increasing efficiency in managing those investments. In addition, General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses encourage executive officers and other employeesteam members to increase sales and to reduce operating expenses and other costs associated with managing our working capital and investments. The Committee also believes that offering Converted RONA Bonuses in lieu of certain eliminated executive perquisites is appropriate to keep us competitive in attracting, retaining, and motivating present and future executive officers and to hold our executive officers accountable for results.

General RONA Bonuses awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan are paid in one lump sum in August. General RONA Bonuses awarded outside the Performance Bonus Plan and Converted RONA Bonuses, which are not awarded under the Performance Bonus Plan, are paid in four installments in October, January, April and August. Each installment is based on actualyear-to-date results. We generally hold back 25% of theyear-end estimate from each October, January and April installment to ensure that we have the flexibility to reconcile the August payments with finalyear-end results. All payments are made in cash, except that General RONA Bonus payments made in August may, at the election of the recipient, be deferred as a credit to the recipient’s Executive Deferral Plan account.

The Committee determines and calculates General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses as follows:

 

 

Setting Target Amounts: During the first quarter of the fiscal year, the Committee determines target General RONA Bonuses and target Converted RONA Bonuses for each of the executive officers. The Committee makes these determinations after review and consideration of Mercer’s annual review, and focuses on setting targets that are reasonable in relation to the median of similar compensation offered to executives in similar positions by the Peer Group companies.

 

 

Converting Target Amounts to “RONA shares”: Once determined, the target amounts set for General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses are converted into a number of “RONA shares” based on our annual goals for return on net assets. In fiscal year 2019,2022, we established and communicated an overall goal of 21.4% return on net assets on a consolidated basis, with a target “multiple” of 5% of base salary for each “share”.“share.” The target amounts were converted into “shares” at the 5% target multiple by dividing the executive officer’s General RONA Bonus or Converted RONA Bonus target by the product of the executive officer’s base salary and the 5% target “multiple.”

48LOGO


Executive Compensation

 

Determining the Actual Multiple: At each installment date, the actual return on net assets is calculated and, as follows, used to determine the actual “multiple”: (a) for that portion of the applicable return on net assets which is less than or equal to 35%, the actual multiple is 1% for every 5.6% of return on net assets; and (b) for that portion of return on net assets in excess of 35%, the actual multiple is 1% for every 11.2% of the excess. We allow our divisions to consider the benefit of intercompany sales when calculating return on net assets, and, therefore, to compensate for this additional benefit, we require an actual return on net assets of 28% for a payout multiple at the 5% target (i.e., 28.0% ÷ 5.6%). In other words, the 28% internal goal represents our estimate of division-level return on net assets performance (which would include intercompany sales) needed to achieve 21.4% return on net assets on a consolidated basis (after excluding intercompany sales).

 

 

Calculating the Actual RONA Bonuses: For General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses, the amounts of the actual bonuses earned are calculated by multiplying the executive officer’s “shares” by his or her multiple, and multiplying that total by his or her base salary for the fiscal year.

The following tables show each of the Named Executive Officers’ General RONA Bonus and Converted RONA Bonus target amounts, “shares”, “multiples” and actual amounts.

 

General RONA BonusesGeneral RONA BonusesGeneral RONA Bonuses 
Named Executive Officer  

Base

Salary Earned

   

Target

General

RONA

Bonus

Amount

   

Target

General

RONA

Bonus

“Shares”

   

General

RONA

Bonus

“Multiple”

   

Actual

General

RONA

Bonus

Amount

 
  
Named Executive Officer 

Base

Salary

 

Target

General

RONA

Bonus

Amount

 

General

RONA

Bonus

“Shares”

  

General

RONA

Bonus

“Multiple”

 

Actual

General

RONA

Bonus

Amount

Thomas L. Williams

 

$1,250,000

 

$1,062,500

 

17

  

6.68%

 

$1,419,500

   1,387,500    1,190,000    17    7.69%    1,813,879 

Catherine A. Suever

 

$   750,800

 

$ 337,860

 

9

  

6.68%

 

$  451,381

Todd M. Leombruno

   736,667    324,000    9    7.69%    509,847 

Lee C. Banks

 

$1,000,000

 

$ 550,000

 

11

  

6.68%

 

$  734,800

   1,112,500    618,750    11    7.69%    941,064 

Robert W. Malone(1)

 

$   605,000

 

$ 242,000

 

8

  

6.81%

 

$  329,604

Jennifer A. Parmentier(2)(3)

 

$   551,458

 

$ 220,583

 

8

  

6.70%

 

$  295,581

Jennifer A. Parmentier(1)

   765,423    412,500    11    7.69%    617,544 

Andrew M. Weeks(2)

   636,283    257,320    8    10.00%    509,027 

 

(1)

Ms. Parmentier’s Target General RONA Bonus was increased by 15%, from 40% to 55%, as a result of her promotion to Chief Operating Officer effective August 9, 2021, and her target General RONA Bonus shares were increased to 11 shares.

(2)

In fiscal year 2019,2022, Mr. MaloneWeeks received his General RONA Bonus under the Performance Bonus Plan. As a result, the Committee used return on consolidated net assets to determine that his maximum General RONA Bonus “Multiple” was 10.23%8.91%. As described below, however, Mr. Malone’sWeeks’ General RONA Bonus “Multiple” was reduced to 5.24%7.69% upon the Committee’s exercise of downward discretion, and then increased to 6.81%10.00% after applying his PG RONA Multiplier under our PGI Plan.

(2)

In fiscal year 2019, Ms. Parmentier’s General RONA Bonus was increased to 6.70% from 6.58% after applying her PG RONA Multiplier under our PGI Plan.

2022 Proxy Statement49


(3)

Ms. Parmentier’s Target General RONA Bonus target payout amount was $211,000 at the beginning of fiscal year 2019, with an adjusted target payout amount of $234,000 due to her promotion in February 2019. Ms. Parmentier’s applicablepro-rata

Executive Compensation portion of her target amount is $220,583.

 

 
Converted RONA Bonuses
     
Named Executive Officer 

Target

Converted

RONA

Bonus

Amount

 

Converted

RONA

Bonus

“Shares”

 

Converted

RONA

Bonus

“Multiple”

 

Actual

Converted

RONA

Bonus

Amount

Thomas L. Williams

 

$78,140

 

1.19

 

6.68%

 

$104,395

Catherine A. Suever

 

$53,610

 

1.48

 

6.68%

 

$  71,623

Lee C. Banks

 

$77,720

 

1.69

 

6.68%

 

$103,834

Robert W. Malone

 

$53,440

 

1.86

 

6.68%

 

$  71,396

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

$53,341

 

1.86

 

6.68%

 

$  71,263

Converted RONA Bonuses
  Named Executive Officer  Target
Converted
RONA
Bonus
Amount
   Converted
RONA
Bonus
“Shares”
   Converted
RONA
Bonus
“Multiple”
   Actual
Converted
RONA
Bonus
Amount
 

Thomas L. Williams

   83,700    1.19    7.69%    128,731 

Todd M. Leombruno

   79,900    1.48    7.69%    88,312 

Lee C. Banks

   83,260    1.69    7.69%    128,054 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

   57,420    1.88    7.69%    122,886 

Andrew M. Weeks

   57,240    1.86    7.69%    88,035 

Each of the Named Executive Officers received the General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses included in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022. In arriving at these amounts, the Committee compared the original target award opportunities for executive officers receiving General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan (including each of the Named Executive Officers other than Ms. Parmentier)Officers) with the final payout amounts of annual cash incentive compensation for the other executive officers, and evaluated the individual performance and contributions to the success of our business of the executive officers receiving General RONA Bonuses under the Performance Bonus Plan. Based on that comparison and evaluation, the Committee determined that it would be appropriate to exercise downward discretion and reduce the final General RONA Bonus payout amounts for General RONA Bonuses awarded to the Named Executive Officers under the Performance Bonus Plan by approximately 35%47.5%. The amounts reported in the tablesGeneral RONA Bonuses table above represent the final amounts paid to the Named Executive Officers following that exercisethose exercises of discretion.

Converted RONA Bonus payments are not eligible for deferral under the Executive Deferral Plan, the Retirement Savings Plan, or the Savings Restoration Plan. Converted RONA Bonuses are also not considered in calculating benefits under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan, the Supplemental Retirement Program, the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan, and the Change in Control Agreements. The Committee determined that it would not be appropriate to allow Converted RONA Bonuses to be deferred under those plans or considered in those calculations because they are intended to replace executive perquisites which, historically, were not used or taken into account for those purposes.

Profitable Growth Incentive Plan

Our PGI Plan is designed to implement the strategies and advance the goals of The Win Strategy by encouraging and rewarding participants for sales growth, organically and through acquisitions at the operating group or division level. The Committee identified sales growth, organically and through acquisitions, as a performance measure critical to advance the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy. Under our PGI Plan, the General RONA Bonuses for participants may be adjusted after each fiscal year on the basis of a multiplier, which we refer to as the PG RONA Multiplier, that is determined by the three-year compound annual growth rate of external customer sales for the applicable operating group or division, which we refer to as3-year CAGR. The following

table sets forth examples of the PG RONA Multiplier that may be applied to, and which may increase or decrease, the General RONA Bonuses under our PGI Plan after each fiscal year:

 

  
3-year CAGR: 

Less than or equal  

to -5%

 3%-5%   8%     

Greater than or equal  

to 15%

  Less than or equal
to -5%
   3%-5%   8%   Greater than or equal
to 15%
 

PG RONA Multiplier:

 

90%

 

100%  

 

105%    

 

130%

   90%    100%    105%    130% 

The PG RONA Multiplier is interpolated on a linear basis between the points in the above table. Of our executive officers, only our operating group presidents’ General RONA Bonuses are subject to our PGI Plan, and, therefore, the PGI Plan applies to Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier,Weeks, but not to any of our other Named Executive Officers. During fiscal year 2019,2022, the three-year CAGR applicable to:to Mr. Malone’sWeeks’ General RONA Bonus was 29.30%17.52%, resulting in a PG RONA Multiplier of 130%; and to Ms. Parmentier’s General RONA Bonus was 6.17%, resulting in a. This PG RONA Multiplier of 102%. These PG RONA Multipliers werewas applied to Mr. Malone’s and Ms. Parmentier’sWeeks’ final RONA BonusesBonus causing the increase from a 5.24%7.69% General RONA Bonus multiple to 6.81%10% for Mr. Malone, and the increase from a 6.58% General RONA Bonus multiple to 6.70% for Ms.  Parmentier,Weeks, as reflected in the General RONA Bonuses charttable above.

Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Cash Incentive Program

On August 17, 2022, the Committee approved and adopted the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Officer Annual Cash Incentive Plan (the “Officer ACIP”), effective July 1, 2022, and established fiscal year 2023 target opportunities thereunder for the Company’s executive officers. Commencing with fiscal year 2023, the Officer ACIP replaces Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses, Converted RONA Bonuses and the Profitable Growth Incentive Plan.

50LOGO


Executive Compensation

The Officer ACIP provides for annual award payouts based on the achievement of performance goals. The performance goals are tied to three performance metrics (segment operating income weighted at 40%, sales revenue weighted at 20% and cash flow weighted at 40%), with each metric evaluated at three performance levels (threshold, target or maximum). The performance levels equate to a percentage of the target payout with respect to the applicable metric (50% for threshold, 100% for target and 200% for maximum). The percentage payout for each metric will be interpolated for performance levels achieved between threshold and target and between target and maximum. The award payout may be further modified by applying a multiplier of up to plus or minus 20% based upon additional performance goals relating to environmental, social and governance matters and other strategic imperatives. The application of the multiplier cannot increase a participant’s award payout above 200% of such participant’s target opportunity. We expect to discuss the Officer ACIP program for fiscal 2023 in greater detail in our 2023 Proxy Statement.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Named Executive Officers receive long-term incentive compensation consisting of long-term incentive performance awards, which we refer to as LTIP Awards, and stock appreciation rights, which we refer to as Stock Incentives. The target amounts of LTIP Awards and the number of Stock Incentives awarded to the Named Executive Officers are based on similar compensation awarded to persons holding comparable positions within the Peer Group companies. In fiscal year 2019, the Committee also granted Messrs. Banks and Malone and Ms. Parmentier restricted stock units for retention purposes and in recognition of their extraordinary contributions to our success in furtherance of The Win Strategy.

LTIP Awards and Stock Incentives encourage long-term focus on shareholder value and are directly and materially linked to performance that advances both the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy over the long-term. LTIP Award payouts are based on a comparison of our performance against the Peer Group companies in certain key financial metrics over a three-year performance period. The holders of Stock Incentives realize a payout only if our stock price increases above the applicable grant price over a three-yearpro-rata vesting period. LTIP Awards and Stock Incentives work together to align the long-term financial interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

LTIP Awards are granted to eligible employees on an annual basis at the January meeting of the Committee. This meeting is typically scheduled at least one year in advance. The only exceptions to this practice are thatpro-rated LTIP Awards are granted to individuals who become executive officers, are promoted to new executive officer positions, or are given increased responsibilities during a performance period.

Stock Incentives are granted to eligible employees on an annual basis at the August meeting of the Committee. This meeting is typically scheduled at least one year in advance.

  Component  Description  2022  2023  2024
  LTIP Awards  

LTIP Awards are granted to eligible employees on an annual basis at the January meeting of the Committee. This meeting is typically scheduled at least one year in advance. The only exceptions to this practice are that pro-rated LTIP Awards are granted to individuals who become executive officers, are promoted to new executive officer positions, or are given increased responsibilities during a performance period.

 

  “Cliff” vesting after

three-year performance period

      
      
      
      
  Stock Incentives          Stock Incentives are granted to eligible team members on an annual basis at the August meeting of the Committee. This meeting is typically scheduled at least one year in advance.  Annual vesting over

three-year performance period

   1/3  1/3  1/3

The Committee does not grant LTIP Awards or Stock Incentives to executive officers in anticipation of the release of significant positive earnings announcements or other materialnon-public information likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock. Similarly, the Committee does not time the release of materialnon-public information based on Stock Incentive grant dates.

LTIP Awards

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Committee adopted a Long-Term Incentive Performance Plan under the Performance Bonus Plan, which we refer to as the Officer LTIP Plan, to

establish the terms and conditions for LTIP Awards granted to our executive officers during and after fiscal year 2011. In fiscal year 2019, after review of benchmarking surveys conducted by Mercer, the Committee approved certain changes to the Officer LTIP Plan to more closely align certain aspects of the LTIP awards with market and Peer Group compensation practices. The changes were effective for the fiscal year 2019 LTIP awards and are as follows:

(i)

The Committee changed the calculation methodology used to determine the number of target LTIP Award shares to grant. Previously, in setting target share amounts, the Committee considered the Company’s average stock price for the preceding twelve months. To set target share amounts in fiscal 2019 and going forward, the Committee will use the Company’s average stock price for the month preceding the determination of target LTIP award amounts;

(ii)

The Committee determined that LTIPs would accrue dividend equivalent units on earned LTIP Award shares beginning with the 2019-20-21 LTIP awards; and

(iii)

The Committee changed the vesting provisions of LTIP Awards received in or after January 2019 such that upon retirement, death or disability of the participant, outstanding LTIP awards would vest ratably based on the completed months of service of the participant within the applicable performance period.

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2019,2022, the Committee granted to each of the Named Executive Officers, under ourthe terms of the Officer LTIP Plan and our Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Amended 2016 Equity Plan, the following target LTIP AwardsAward values for the calendar year 2022-23-24 performance period based on the following target LTIP Award values:values for the calendar year 2022-23-24 performance period:

 

    
Named Executive Officer Target LTIP Award Shares    Target LTIP Award Values    

Target LTIP Award

Shares

   Target LTIP Award
Values ($)
 

Thomas L. Williams

 

32,670

   

$5,000,000

     18,480    5,750,000 

Catherine A. Suever

 

  8,820

   

$1,350,000

  

Todd M. Leombruno

   4,500    1,400,000 

Lee C. Banks

 

14,700

   

$2,250,000

     8,360    2,600,000 

Robert W. Malone

 

  3,920

   

$  600,000

  

Jennifer A. Parmentier*

 

  2,660

   

$  407,500

  

Jennifer A. Parmentier(1)

   5,300    1,650,000 

Andrew M. Weeks

   2,410    750,000 

 

*(1)

Ms. Parmentier also received supplemental LTIP Awardsawards for the calendar yearyears 2017-18-19,2019-20-21,2018-19-202020-21-22 and2019-20-212021-22-23 performance periods in the amounts of 351, 677763, 2,067 and 1,2252,714 target shares respectively, for a total number of 2,2535,544 additional LTIP target shares having a target award value of $370,371, in connection with her promotion to Vice President and President—Motion Systems Group in February 2019.Chief Operating Officer.

2022 Proxy Statement51


Executive Compensation

The target LTIP Award shares shown in this table (along with the awarded dividend equivalent units applicable to the calendar year2019-20-21 performance period) are also included in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards—Target” column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192022 table. The “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022 includes the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards in fiscal year 2019.2022.

Under the Officer LTIP Plan, the actual payouts for these LTIP Awards will be calculated following the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2021,2024, as follows:

 

The Committee will first determine if, during the performance period, we achieved an average return on average equity of 4% or an average free cash flow margin of 4%.

 

If at least one of these threshold performance measures above are not achieved, participants will not receive a payout.

If at least one of these threshold performance measures above are achieved, participants will become eligible to receive the maximum payout of 200% of the applicable target LTIP Award value. The Committee will then, if appropriate, apply its discretion to reduce the final payouts based on any performance measures that the Committee determines to be appropriate. The Committee determined that this calculation methodology would provide the Committee with more flexibility to ensure payout levels are as accurately reflective of the Company’s performance against the Peer Group as possible and are otherwise in the best interests of our business and our shareholders.

To provide the Committee with guidelines for exercising its discretion, the Officer LTIP Plan provides that the Committee may, among other things, following the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212022-23-24 performance period compare our revenue growth, growth in fully diluted earnings per share from continuing operations and average return on invested capital from continuing operations against the corresponding results of the Peer Group companies during their three most recent fiscal years. The Committee has identified long-term revenue growth, earnings per share growth and return on invested capital as performance measures critical to the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy because, among other things, they encourage our executive officers to provideon-time delivery of quality products, value-added services and systems, strategic supply chain, lean enterprise, value pricing, market-driven innovation and strong distribution.

Specifically,For calendar year 2022-23-24 LTIP awards, the Officer LTIP Plan provides for using weights of 20%Committee determined to adjust the weighting for revenue growth, 40% for growth in the fully diluted earnings per share fromfor continuing operations, and average return on invested capital from 20%, 40% and 40% respectively, to 40%, 40% and 20% respectively. The Committee believes the increase over prior years in weighting from 20% to 40% in revenue growth and decrease from 40% to 20% for average return on invested capital from continuing operations more closely aligns the 2022-23-24 LTIP awards with the strongest drivers of total shareholder returns.

The following table illustrates how final LTIP Awards will pay out using the weightings as specified above for the applicable performance periods, and the following table to calculate final LTIP Award payouts:period:

 

  Peer Group Percentile Rank:  Less than 35th   35th   50th   75th or higher 

Payout%

   0%    50%    100%    200% 

At the end of calendar year 2021,2024, if we achieve an average return on average equity or an average free cash flow margin of 4% or greater, the Committee may exercise discretion in determining the appropriate payout by determining our percentile rank as compared to the Peer Group for each of the three performance measures. Using thisthe table above, the Committee will calculate the portion of the target LTIP Award value earned with respect to each performance measure. The Committee will multiply each portion by its applicable weight and add up the total to determine the total LTIP Award payout for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212022-23-24 performance period. This table illustrates that recipients of LTIP Awards granted during calendar year 20192022 will receive the maximum payout of 200% of the applicable target LTIP Award value if we rank at or above the 75th percentile among the Peer Group companies in the aggregate based on all three performance measures, and will receive no payout if we rank at or below the 35th percentile in the aggregate based on all three performance measures. The payout percentage that is applied is interpolated on a linear basis between the points in the above table.

LTIP Award payouts for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212022-23-24 performance period may only be paid after the end of the applicable three-year performance period in unrestricted shares of our common stock.

The Committee designed these LTIP Awards to reward executive officers directly in relation to our long-term performance against the Peer Group. The Committee determined that requiring performance in excess of the 50th percentile for a payout in excess of 100% would encourage executive officers to achieve performance above median Peer Group performance. The Committee also determined that requiring performance at the 75th percentile for a maximum payout, and awarding no payout for performance at or below the 35th percentile, would further encourage executive officers to achievetop-quartile performance within the Peer Group companies.

52LOGO


Executive Compensation

In addition, each of the Named Executive Officers received a payout during fiscal year 2022 under LTIP Awards granted during the third quarter of fiscal year 20162019 for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2018.2021. We exceeded our threshold performance measures of 4% average return on average equity and 4% average free cash flow margin with an average return on average equity for the three-year performance period of 20.4%22.2% and average free cash flow margin for the three-year performance period of 10.4%.14.5%, which caused each participant to be eligible for a payout of 200% of the applicable LTIP award. The Committee decided to exercise discretion to determine the appropriate payout and determined that we achieved the following percentile rankings among the Peer Group companies with respect to the LTIP Award performance measures for the calendar yearyears 2016-17-182019-20-21 performance period:

 

    
Performance Measure  Result  Percentile Rank  

Weighted    

Payout    

Percentage    

 

Revenue growth

  

 

22.19%

 

 

88th

  

 

200.00

Growth in fully diluted EPS

  

 

73.89%

 

 

76th

  

 

200.00

Average return on invested capital

  

 

18.20%

 

 

65th

  

 

158.80

  Performance Measure  Result   Percentile Rank   Weighted Payout
Percentage
 

Revenue Growth (20%)

   5.33%    83rd    40% 

Earnings Per Share Growth (40%)

   40.22%    78th    80% 

Average Return on Invested Capital (40%)

   15.53%    67th    66.66% 

As a result, each of the Named Executive Officers received the LTIP Award payout during fiscal year 20192022 included in the “Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting” column of the Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 20192022 table. Each payment represents a total payout of 183.52%186.66% of the target LTIP Award values for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2018.2021. In utilizing negative discretion to reduce the 2019-20-21 LTIP awards from 200% to 186.66% guided by the performance measures above, the Committee determined to exclude certain unusual expenses related to the pending acquisition of Meggitt PLC, including expenses from the Company’s deal contingent forward hedge and commercial paper issuance.

Stock Incentives

Each of the Named Executive Officers received Stock Incentives under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019.2022. The Committee grants Stock Incentives to executive officers to encourage and reward efforts and accomplishments that advance the goals of The Win Strategy and make other contributions to maximize long-term shareholder value.

The number of Stock Incentives granted by the Committee is determined by utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model to convert a target dollar value into the number of Stock Incentives to be granted. The Committee uses Mercer’s annual review to help ensure the target dollar values are reasonable in relation to the median of similar compensation offered within the companies included in Mercer’s annual review. The following table shows the Target Valuetarget value and the number of Stock Incentives granted to each of the Named Executive Officers in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019:2022:

 

  
Named Executive Officer  Target Value            

Stock Incentive Grants

(# of Underlying Shares)

   Target
Value
   Stock Incentive Grants
(# of Underlying Shares)
 

Thomas L. Williams

  

$5,000,000          

  

 

81,180

 

  $5,750,000    51,700 

Catherine A. Suever

  

$1,350,000          

  

 

21,920

 

Todd M. Leombruno

  $1,400,000    12,590 

Lee C. Banks

  

$2,250,000          

  

 

36,530

 

  $2,600,000    23,380 

Robert W. Malone

  

$   600,000          

  

 

9,740

 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

  

$   407,500          

  

 

6,620

 

  $1,650,000    14,840 

Andrew M. Weeks

  $750,000    6,740 

The fiscal year 20192022 Stock Incentive grants shown above are also included in the “All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities

Underlying Options” column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192022 table and the “Option Awards—Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options—Unexercisable” column of the Outstanding Equity Awards at June 30, 20192022 table. The “Option Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022 includes the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards in fiscal year 2019.2022.

As required by the terms of our Amended 2016 Equity Plan, these fiscal year 20192022 Stock Incentives have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The plan does not permit there-pricing of Stock Incentives. The Committee analyzed the terms of our Amended 2016 Equity Plan and considered Mercer’s annual review to establish all other terms of these Stock Incentives. These fiscal year 20192022 Stock Incentives have aten-year term and vest inone-third increments over three years following the grant date. When vested, each Stock Incentive will entitle the holder to receive the increase in value of one common share from the grant date to the date of exercise.

Upon exercise of fiscal year 20192022 Stock Incentives, common shares will be issued directly to the holder. The appreciation in these Stock Incentives will be calculated by subtracting the grant price from the fair market value of the common shares at exercise, and multiplying the result by the number of Stock Incentives exercised. The number of common shares to be issued is determined by dividing that appreciation by the market price of the common shares at exercise.

During fiscal year 2019, none of the Named

2022 Proxy Statement53


Executive Officers exercised Stock Incentives previously granted under our 2016 Equity Plan, 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and 2003 Stock Incentive Plan.Compensation

Restricted Stock Units

During fiscal year 2019,On January 26, 2022 the Committee granted retention and recognition awardsan award of restricted stock units, which we refer to as1,610 RSUs to the following Named Executive OfficersMr. Weeks for retention purposes and in recognition of their significanthis performance and contributions to the execution of the goals of The Win Strategy:

Named Executive OfficerGrant DateNumber of RSUs    
Granted    
Vesting Date

Lee C. Banks

July 24, 2018

15,020

August 5, 2022

Robert W. Malone

August 15, 2018

  6,010

August 5, 2022

Jennifer A. Parmentier

August 15, 2018

  6,010

August 5, 2022

Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock. The RSUs will vest in full on the applicableStrategy. This award had a vesting date identified above, provided that the Named Executive Officer remainsof January 26, 2025 and would generally have vested only if Mr. Weeks remained an active full-time employee throughout the vesting period. If the Named Executive Officer ceases to be employed by us for any reason, other than death, disability orthrough that date. As a Change in Control as defined beginningresult of his announced retirement on page 68, she or he will forfeit the entireJuly 26, 2022, Mr. Weeks forfeited this RSU award. In the event of the Named Executive Officer’s death, disability or a Change in Control prior to the applicable vesting date, the RSUs will vest immediately. Upon the applicable vesting date, the RSUs will be paid to the Named Executive Officer or her or his estate in shares of our common stock. The Named Executive Officer does not receive dividends nor does she or he have voting rights in the common shares underlying the RSUs,

This RSU award, however, she or he does receive dividend equivalents.

The above described RSUs arewas granted during fiscal year 2022 and is therefore included in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards—Target”“All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units” column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2019 table. The2022 table, and it’s fiscal year 2022 aggregate grant date fair value is included in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019 includes the aggregate grant date fair value of this award in fiscal year 2019.2022.

Employee Benefits

The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in various employee benefit plans and programs. These plans and programs reward experience, expertise, level of responsibility, continuity of leadership and advancement. We use these plans to ensure that our executive compensation program remains sufficiently competitive to attract, retain and motivate the executive officers and other employeesteam members necessary to advance the goals of The Win Strategy.

Qualified Benefit Plans

During fiscal year 2019,2022, the Named Executive Officers participated in the followingtax-qualified benefit plans and programs:

 

The Parker-Hannifin Consolidated Pension Plan, which we refer to as the Pension Plan, except for Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier and Mr. Weeks who are not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan; and

 

The Parker Retirement Savings Plan, which we refer to as the Retirement Savings Plan.

PENSION PLAN

The Pension Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan in which most full-timenon-union U.S. salaried employees hired prior to April 1, 2004, participate. The Pension Plan offers normal retirement, early retirement and death benefits. The monthly normal retirement benefit is the greater of a minimum benefit and an amount based on final average pay. The minimum benefit and final average pay amounts are calculated as follows:

 

Minimum Benefit:

  

 $21.00$21.00 multiplied by years of service, up to a maximum of 40 years.

Final Average Pay

         Amount:

  

   0.75% of the highest five consecutive year average of monthly base salary, Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses up to the social security wage base, multiplied by years of service up to a maximum of 35 years; plus

 

   1.36% of the highest five consecutive year average of monthly base salary, Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses in excess of the social security wage base, multiplied by years of service up to a maximum of 35 years; plus

 

   0.50% of the highest five consecutive year average of monthly base salary, Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses multiplied by years of service in excess of 35 up to a maximum of five years.

The amount of the benefit is reduced by 6% per year for each year prior to age 65 if retirement occurs and payments commence before age 65 and after age 55. We elected to freeze new participation in the Pension Plan in 2004. All participants as of April 1, 2004, were given the option to either remain in the Pension Plan or terminate in favor of maintaining a retirement income account under the Retirement Savings Plan. Employees hired after April 1, 2004, including Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier and Mr. Weeks, were not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan and instead maintain a retirement income account under the Retirement Savings Plan. Each of the Named Executive Officers who are in the Pension Plan elected to remain in and continue to accrue benefits under the Pension Plan. All benefits accrued by employeesteam members who elected to terminate participation in the Pension Plan were frozen as of June 30, 2004. Those employeesteam members initiated their retirement income accounts on July 1, 2004.

54LOGO


Executive Compensation

RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

The Retirement Savings Plan is a qualified defined contribution pension plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Most full-time U.S. employeesteam members are eligible to participate in the Retirement Savings Plan. Participants may makepre-tax andpost-tax contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan up to the applicable statutory limit. Converted RONA Bonuses are not eligible for deferral under the Retirement Savings Plan. We provide toThrough December 31, 2021 we provided each participant with a matching contribution of 100% on the first 3% of pay contributed and 50% on the 4th and 5th percent of pay contributed on apre-tax basisor Roth basis. Effective January 1, 2022, we provided each participant with a matching contribution of 100% on the first 5% of pay contributed on a pre-tax or Roth basis. As described above, certain participants also maintain a retirement income account within the Retirement Savings Plan. We provide to each holder of a retirement income account an annual contribution equal to a percentage of the amount of the participant’s annual compensation

up to the Internal Revenue Service statutory limit (currently $280,000$305,000 per year), based on age and length of service. These contributions range from 0.5%3% to 6% of the participant’s compensation which does not exceed that limit. Participants accrue earnings on contributions based on the performance of various investment funds available within the Retirement Savings Plan. The contributions made by us under the Retirement Savings Plan for the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022 on page 54.61.

Non-Qualified Benefit Plans

During fiscal year 2019,2022, the Named Executive Officers participated in the followingnon-qualified benefit plans and programs:

 

The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Savings Restoration Plan, which we refer to as the Savings Restoration Plan;

 

The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Executive Deferral Plan, which we refer to as the Executive Deferral Plan, except for Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier and Mr. Weeks who do not participate in the Executive Deferral Plan;

 

The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Pension Restoration Plan, which we refer to as the Pension Restoration Plan, except for Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier and Mr. Weeks who are not eligible to participate in the Pension Restoration Plan as they are not participants in the Pension Plan;

 

The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits Program, which we refer to as the Supplemental Retirement Program, except for Mr. MaloneLeombruno, Ms. Parmentier and Ms. ParmentierMr.Weeks who are not eligible to participate in the Supplemental Retirement Program; and

 

The Parker-Hannifin Corporation Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Program, which we refer to as the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program (Mr. MaloneLeombruno, Ms. Parmentier and Ms. ParmentierMr. Weeks are the only Named Executive Officers who participate in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program).

SAVINGS RESTORATION PLAN

The Savings Restoration Plan is available to employeesteam members who earn base salaries equal to or in excess of $150,000 per year and who are otherwise eligible to participate in the plan. The Savings Restoration Plan was established to restore deferral opportunities and matching contributions lost because of statutory limits in the Retirement Savings Plan. Specifically, the Savings Restoration Plan allows executive officers to defer a portion of theirpre-tax compensation and receive matching contributions from us that would have been available under the Retirement Savings Plan if the Internal Revenue Service statutory limit did not exist. Converted RONA Bonuses are not eligible for deferral under the Savings Restoration Plan. Each Named Executive Officer may annually defer to his or her Savings Restoration Plan account any portion of the compensation that he or she cannot defer under the Retirement Savings Plan due to the statutory limit, other than Converted RONA Bonuses, up to the greater of 20% of base pay or $25,000. We provide toThrough December 31, 2021 we provided each participant with a matching contribution of common stock equal to 100% on the first 3% of pay contributed and 50% on the 4th and 5th percent of pay contributed,contributed. Effective January 1, 2022 we provided each participant with a matching contribution of 100% on the first 5% of pay contributed. These matching contributions were reduced by the maximum matching contribution available to the participant under the Retirement Savings Plan. We also take into account the matching contributions made under the Retirement Savings Plan to ensure that the maximum match under both plans does not exceed $17,000. In addition, all participants who maintain a retirement income account within the Retirement Savings Plan also maintain a separate retirement income account within the Savings Restoration Plan. We provide to each holder of a retirement income account an annual contribution equal to a percentage of the amount of the participant’s annual compensation in excess of the Internal Revenue

Service statutory limit determined based on age and length of service. These contributions range from 0.5%3% to 6% of the amount of the participant’s compensation in excess of that limit. All deferrals and contributions are made under the Savings Restoration Plan by accounting entry rather than any physical exchange of cash or common stock. Participants also accrue earnings, on an accounting-entry basis, on deferrals based on the performance of various investment fund choices and on contributions based on the performance of our common stock. Participants are our unsecured creditors for their respective account balances.

2022 Proxy Statement55


Executive Compensation

Savings Restoration Plan and Executive Deferral Plan account balances are paid out upon any of the following events as follows:

 

 

Retirement:

  

 

Balances are distributed to the participant in either a lump sum or in periodic installments, based on a prior election by the participant. The participant can delay the commencement of payments up to five years following retirement. Balances continue to accumulate earnings under the various investment funds at all times during the payout period.

 

 

Termination Before

Retirement:

  

 

Balances accruing on or prior to December 31, 2004 are, at our election, distributed to the participant in either a lump sum upon termination or in periodic installments. Account balances accruing on or after January 1, 2005 are distributed to the participant in a lump sum upon termination.

 

 

Disability:

  

 

If we determine that a participant is totally disabled, the participant’s account balance will be paid upon termination in the same manner as if he or she retired.

 

 

Withdrawals During

Employment:

  

 

Balances can be withdrawn without penalty during employment only if we determine that the participant suffered severe financial hardship. Balances accruing on or prior to December 31, 2004 can also be withdrawn voluntarily during employment, subject to a 10% forfeiture penalty.

 

 

Death:

  

 

Balances are distributed to the participant’s beneficiary in a lump sum or, if elected by the participant, in installments.

 

 

Change in Control:

  

 

Under the Savings Restoration Plan, balances accruing on or prior to December 31, 2004 are distributed to the participant in a lump sum without penalty if the participant expressly elected a lump sum. If the participant did not expressly elect a lump sum, distributions are treated as unscheduled withdrawals and are subject to a forfeiture penalty of 5% if they are withdrawn within 30 days or 10% if they are withdrawn beyond the30-day period. Balances accruing on or after January 1, 2005 are distributed to the participant in a lump sum. Under the Executive Deferral Plan, balances are distributed to the participant in a lump sum.

 

Our matching contributions made under the Savings Restoration Plan for the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022. All contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Savings Restoration Plan during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192022 table.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN

The Executive Deferral Plan is available to executive officers and certain other key employees.team members. The Executive Deferral Plan provides executive officers with an opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation (in addition to that deferred under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Savings

Restoration Plan) on apre-tax basis, including Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses, and to accumulatetax-deferred earnings on the deferrals. LTIP Award payouts and Converted RONA Bonuses are not eligible for deferral under the Executive Deferral Plan. Each executive may defer to his or her account up to 80% of base salary and 80% of General RONA Bonuses paid in August and Target Incentive Bonuses paid in August. Similar to the Savings Restoration Plan, all deferrals are made under the Executive Deferral Plan by accounting entry rather than any physical exchange of cash. Participants also accrue earnings on an accounting-entry basis based on the performance of various investment fund choices. Participants are our unsecured creditors for their respective account balances. Account balances in the Executive Deferral Plan are paid as indicated in the chart below.table above. For those who were participants in the Executive Deferral Plan prior to January 1, 2016, prior to distribution, the balances are increased to reflect any“gross-up” amount necessary to offset federal excise taxes and anyafter-tax value the participant would have received if the account had remained in place and been paid as elected by the participant. Any balances on distribution to a participant in the Executive Deferral Plan who becomes a participant on or after January 1, 2016, are no longer increased to reflect any“gross-up” amount to offset federal excise taxes and anyafter-tax value the participant would have received if the account had remained in place and been paid as elected by the participant. All contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Executive Deferral Plan during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192022 table.

56LOGO


Executive Compensation

THE PENSION RESTORATION PLAN

The Pension Restoration Plan is available to all individuals who participate in the Pension Plan and who are otherwise eligible to participate in the Pension Restoration Plan. The Pension Restoration Plan was established to restore benefits lost because of statutory limits on the Pension Plan. Specifically, the benefits available under the Pension Restoration Plan equal the amount that would be payable to the participant under the Pension Plan in excess of the Internal Revenue Service statutory limit if that limit did not exist and the participant had not elected to defer any compensation under the Savings Restoration Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan. Similar to the Pension Plan, Converted RONA Bonuses are not considered in calculating the benefits available under the Pension Restoration Plan.

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PROGRAM

The Supplemental Retirement Program was established to provide executive officers with retirement benefits supplemental to the benefits under the Pension Plan. The benefit provided under the Supplemental Retirement Program is intended, at age 65, to provide to participants with at least 15 years of service 55% of the average of the three highest years of base salary plus annual cash incentive compensation. Similar to the Pension Plan and the Pension Restoration Plan, Converted RONA Bonuses are not considered in calculating the benefits available under the Supplemental Retirement Program. LTIP Awards and Stock Incentives are also not considered in calculating the benefits available under the Supplemental Retirement Program. The benefit is subject to reduction for early retirement, less than 15 years of service, benefits under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and any of ournon-U.S. pension plans, 50% of primary social security benefits and 100% of any similarnon-U.S. state-provided retirement benefits, and contributions to the participant’s retirement income accounts under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Savings Restoration Plan. Participants vest at age 60, or at age 55 with the consent of the Committee, and with five years of participation in the Supplemental Retirement Program, or a lesser period established by the Committee at the time they become participants. To receive a benefit under the Supplemental Retirement Program, however, a vested participant must have at least five years of service. In January 2015, the Committee closed the Supplemental Retirement Program to new participants as of July 1, 2014.

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PROGRAM

The Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program was established to provide executive officers and certain other key management employeesteam members with retirement benefits supplemental to the benefits under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Savings Restoration Plan. The Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program was established to replace the Supplemental Retirement Program for executive officers who are designated as participants on or after July 1, 2014.

Depending on a participant’s salary grade on December 31 of each year, we provide an annualnon-discretionary employer contribution of 8%, 10% or 12% of a participant’s base salary, Target Incentive Bonus and General RONA Bonus that was paid during the calendar year. The Committee may determine to make an additional annual discretionary contribution to a designated participant’s account. Participants vest at age 60, or at age 55 with the consent of the Committee, and with five years of participation in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, or a lesser period established by the Committee at the time they become participants. To receive a benefit under the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, however, a vested participant must have at least five years of service. Mr. MaloneMessrs. Leombruno and Weeks, as well as Ms. Parmentier, are ourthe only Named Executive Officers who participate in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program.

Our contributions made under the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program for Mr. Malone and Ms. ParmentierWeeks during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022. All contributions, earnings, withdrawals, distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192022 table.

Health and Welfare Benefits

The Named Executive Officers participated in various health and welfare programs generally available to all employeesteam members during fiscal year 2019.2022. The Named Executive Officers also participated in our Officer Life Insurance Plan and our Executive Long-Term Disability Plan.

OFFICER LIFE INSURANCE PLAN

Under the Officer Life Insurance Plan, we pay all required premiums for life insurance on executive officers who were participants prior to January 1, 2008 (which includes Named Executive Officers Messrs. Williams and Banks) for the longer of 10 years or until the executive officer reaches age 65. For those executive officers who were participants after January 1, 2008 (which includes Named Executive Officers Mses. Suever andMs. Parmentier and Mr. Malone)Messrs. Leombruno and Weeks) we pay all required premiums for life insurance until retirement up to age 65. The premiums are designed to maintain death benefits equal to:

2022 Proxy Statement57


Executive Compensation

 

five times base salary during employment and two times final base salary after retirement at age 65 for our Chief Executive Officer;

 

four times base salary during employment and two times final base salary after retirement at age 65 for our Chief Financial Officer, and our President and our Chief Operating Officer; and

 

three times base salary during employment and two times final base salary after retirement at age 65 for all other Named Executive Officers and other participants.

If the participant retires between ages 55 and 65, the post-retirement death benefit is reduced by 10% of base salary for each year prior to age 65 that the participant retires. The amount of the death benefit is adjusted each year on January 1st based on the participant’s base salary as of the preceding December 1st. The policies underlying the plan are cash value life insurance policies owned by the participants. The premiums we paid on behalf of the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 20192022 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN

The Executive Long-Term Disability Plan is intended to replace a reasonable amount of an executive officer’s income upon disability. The plan provides a total benefit in the event of a qualifying disability oftwo-thirds of base salary plus Target Incentive Bonuses and General RONA Bonuses (after applying the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable) paid during the calendar year ending December 31 of

the year prior to the disability, up to a maximum monthly benefit, in the case of Messrs. Williams and Banks, and Ms. Suever, of $33,000, or, in the case of Mr. MaloneMs. Parmentier and Ms. Parmentier,Messrs. Leombruno and Weeks, of $35,000. Our executive officers are not eligible to receive the long-term disability benefit generally available to other employees.team members.

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

On July 26, 2022, Mr. Weeks and the Company mutually agreed on the terms of his retirement from the Company on August 31, 2022, following a brief transition period. In connection with Mr. Weeks’ agreed retirement, the Company and Mr. Weeks entered into a separation agreement, effective July 26, 2022. For more information, see the Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control at June 30, 2022 section of this Proxy Statement.

Change in Control Agreements

We are not a party to any written employment agreements with our executive officers. We have, however, entered into separate Change in Control Severance Agreements with our executive officers, which we refer to as the Change in Control Agreements. We are not obligated to pay severance to executive officers under any agreement other than the Change in Control Agreements. The executive officers are, however, eligible to receive severance upon termination for reasons other than a change in control in accordance with our general severance policy for salaried employees. The Change in Control Agreements are designed to attract, retain and motivate executive officers, provide for stability and continuity of management in the event of any actual or threatened change in control, encourage executive officers to remain in service after a change in control and ensure that executive officers are able to devote their entire attention to maximizing shareholder value and safeguarding employeeteam member interests in the event of a change in control. The Committee determined that the amounts payable under the Change in Control Agreements are reasonable and necessary to achieve those objectives. The Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control at June 30, 2019,2022, tables and the related narrative descriptions provide additional information on the Change in Control Agreements, including a brief discussion of the material provisions of the Change in Control Agreements under the captions “Payments upon a Change in Control” and “Payments upon a Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control.”

Indemnification Agreements

We enter into separate Indemnification Agreements with each of our executive officers. Each agreement remains in effect during and after employment with respect to any action taken while the individual serves as an executive officer. The agreements are designed to attract, retain and motivate executive officers by encouraging reasonable and measured risk-taking in the interests of our business and our shareholders, and protecting against liabilities incurred in the performance of their duties to the maximum extent permitted by Ohio law.

The agreements provide for indemnification for all expenses, including attorney fees, judgments, fines, and settlement amounts, that the executive officer incurs by reason of his or her service:

 

in a civil action or proceeding by another party (unless it is proven that the officer’s act or failure to act was taken with deliberate intent to cause injury to our business or in reckless disregard for the best interest of our business); or

 

in a criminal action or proceeding (unless the officer had reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful).

58LOGO


Executive Compensation

“Clawback” Policy

Our Board of Directors maintains a “clawback” policy which allows us to recover or withhold any Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses, Converted RONA Bonuses or LTIP Awards which are paid or payable to an executive officer if:

payment, grant or vesting was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement of any of our financial statements filed with the SEC;

our Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion that the fraud or misconduct of the executive officer caused or contributed to the need for the restatement;

the amount that would have been paid or payable to the executive officer would have been less if the financial results had been properly reported; and

our Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion that it is in our best interests and in the best interests of our shareholders to require the executive officer to repay or forfeit all or any portion of the amount paid or payable.

Executive Perquisites

During fiscal year 2019,2022, we made various executive perquisites available to each of the Named Executive Officers. These perquisites are offered to promote the business objectives for each perquisite as described below and to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive to attract, retain and motivate the individuals necessary to advance the goals of The Win Strategy. The costs of these perquisites for the Named Executive Officers reportable for fiscal year 20192022 are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

Private ClubsClubs. . We pay or reimburse initiation fees for one private club for each executive officer. We offer this perquisite to encourage executive officers to entertain business colleagues and customers, engage in social interaction with peers from other companies, local leadership and the community, and hold business meetings at offsiteoff-site locations. Historically we have paid or reimbursed the initiation fees and provided gross up payments on those fees for additional clubs for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the President, and the Chief Operating Officer and at the Executive and Senior Vice President levels on a business-needs basis and only with appropriate advance approval. We maintain a policy of not providing gross up payments on private club initiation fees, and in fiscal year 20192022 no such gross up payments were made.

Spousal TravelTravel. . In limited circumstances and only with appropriate advance approval, we reimburse our executive officers for transportation, lodging, meals, entertainment and other travel expenses for their spouses or other family members who accompany them onout-of-town business. We offer these perquisites to encourage executive officers to spend an appropriate amount of time with their direct reports in locations away from corporate headquarters, to allow executive officers and their spouses to develop a more personal relationship with the executive officers’ subordinates and their families, and to encourage spouses to attend retirement parties, funerals, business dinners and other corporate functions at locations away from their homes.

Executive PhysicalsPhysicals. . We pay for annual physicals and any necessary travel vaccinations for each of our executive officers and certain other key employees.team members. We offer this benefit as part of our overall preventive medicine program to promptly identify and address medical issues and to preserve our investment in our executive officers by encouraging them to maintain healthy lifestyles and be proactive in addressing actual or potential health issues.

Leased VehiclesVehicles. . We lease an automobile for each of our executive officers and for certain other key employees.team members. We offer this perquisite to provide executive officers with use of a company car for business travel needs, recognizing that the vehicles can also be used for personal purposes. We pay or reimburse each executive officer for lease payments on one automobile, typically for a three-year term. Each executive officer has a maximum allowance of $1,570 per month. We also reimburse each executive officer for the cost of tires and maintenance and provide insurance on each vehicle during the lease term. We require each executive officer to take title to his or her vehicle at the end of the lease term because we amortize the entire cost of the vehicle over the lease term. We pay or reimburse each executive officer for sales taxes on his or her vehicle at the time of title transfer, but the executive officer is responsible for the payment of all income taxes assessed on payments and reimbursements made during the lease term and at the time of title transfer, including those assessed on the fair market value of the vehicle at the time of title transfer.

2022 Proxy Statement59


Executive Compensation

Matching Gifts ProgramProgram. . We match any amount in excess of $20$50 contributed to any accredited educational institution by an active, full-time employee, retiree, or member of our Board of Directors with at least one year of service. Our matching contributions are capped at $5,000 per fiscal year for any individual’s contribution to any single institution, and $10,000 per fiscal year for any individual’s aggregate contributions to all institutions.

Company ApartmentsApartments. . We maintain apartments in Cleveland, Ohio, and Newport Beach, California and London, England to provide accommodations to employeesteam members workingoff-site at or relocating to our primary facilities. The apartments are also available to the executive officers for personal use with appropriate advance approval if the apartments are not otherwise being used for business purposes.

Entertainment VenuesVenues. . We maintain loges, boxes and tickets at various entertainment venues to provide civic support to arts, entertainment and other cultural activities at certain significant business locations and to provide a favorable setting for our employeesteam members to entertain customers and other business associates. The loges, boxes and tickets are, however, available to executive officers for

personal use if they are not otherwise being used for business purposes. We pay all costs of admission, but all costs of food are paid by the executive officer using the venue only for personal use.

Corporate AircraftAircraft. . Effective May 1, 2019, the Committee elected to offer limitednon-business use of our corporate aircraft to our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer for purposes of their safety, security, confidentiality and productivity while traveling. Such use is limited to U.S. domestic travel only and 50 hours of flight time per fiscal year for our Chief Executive Officer and 30 hours of flight time per fiscal year to each of our President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Otherwise,non-business use of our corporate aircraft by our executive officers is only available if (a) the flight was previously authorized for business purposes, there are available seats that are not being used for those business purposes and the officer’s use does not involve a deviation or extension of the planned business-travel itinerary, or (b) there is a medical emergency or other special circumstance and the flight ispre-approved by our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer or Chief Financial Officer.

CONSIDERATION OF 2018SAY-ON-PAY VOTING RESULTSAccounting and Tax Considerations

AtOur executive compensation program is structured to achieve flexibility, maximize benefits and minimize detriments to our 2018 Annual Meetingbusiness and our executive officers from a tax and accounting perspective. As a result, we continuously review and evaluate the impact of Shareholders, we received approval, based on the total votes cast, for our advisory“say-on-pay” vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Committeechanges in tax laws and Mercer specifically considered the voting results when exploring potential changes toaccounting practices and interpretations and similar factors affecting our executive compensation program in fiscal year 2019. Theprogram.

Compensation Committee believes the voting results demonstrate strong, consistent support for our executive compensation program. The Committee will continue to explore with Mercer potential improvements to our executive compensation program to the extent appropriate to keep our executive compensation program aligned with best practices in our competitive market.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTReport

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with the Corporation’s management and, based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

Human Resources and Compensation Committee:

CandyJoseph Scaminace, Chair

Jillian C. Evanko

Lance M. Obourn, Chair

Robert G. BohnFritz

Kevin A. Lobo

Joseph Scaminace

James R. Verrier

James L. Wainscott

60LOGO


Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION TABLESCompensation Tables

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2022

The following table sets forth compensation information for our Named Executive Officers.

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  

Salary

($)(1)

  

Stock
Awards

($)(2)

  

Option
Awards

($)(3)

  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
 Compensation 
($)(4)
  

 

Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)(5)

  All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
  

Total

($)

 

Thomas L. Williams,

 

2019

 

 

1,250,000

 

 

 

5,173,005

 

 

 

2,980,930

 

 

 

3,148,895

 

 

 

4,757,754

 

 

 

161,916

 

 

 

17,472,500

 

Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board

 2018  1,200,000   6,068,600   2,961,344   2,167,473   5,667,239   173,790   18,238,446 
 2017  1,125,000   5,303,474   2,935,010   2,418,118   3,372,639   173,860   15,328,101 

 

Catherine A. Suever,

Executive Vice President –
Finance and Administration
and Chief Financial Officer

 

2019

 

 

750,800

 

 

 

1,396,550

 

 

 

804,902

 

 

 

1,123,604

 

 

 

2,732,897

 

 

 

99,632

 

 

 

6,908,385

 

 2018  715,000   1,580,843   771,284   860,970   1,461,719   106,816   5,496,632 
 2017  570,747   1,849,646   153,010   538,377   343,023   96,011   3,550,814 
                              

Lee C. Banks,

 

2019

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

4,828,211

 

 

 

1,341,382

 

 

 

1,738,634

 

 

 

2,632,389

 

 

 

234,326

 

 

 

11,774,942

 

President and Chief
Operating Officer

 2018  950,000   2,909,002   1,419,098   1,417,466   2,102,817   150,410   8,948,793 
 2017  900,000   2,571,744   1,422,993   1,622,363   931,306   166,586   7,614,992 

Robert W. Malone,

 

2019

 

 

605,000

 

 

 

1,621,259

 

 

 

357,653

 

 

 

703,600

 

 

 

--

 

 

 

784,314

 

 

 

4,071,826

 

Vice President and President –
Filtration Group

 2018  565,100   758,053   370,088   491,122   --   708,893   2,893,256 
 2017  467,575   892,289   275,696   433,069   --   643,788   2,712,417 

Jennifer A. Parmentier(7)

 

2019

 

 

551,458

 

 

 

1,793,819

 

 

 

243,086

 

 

 

642,674

 

 

 

--

 

 

 

540,551

 

 

 

3,771,588

 

Vice President and President –
Motion Systems Group

 

         
                              
  Name and Principal Position Year  Salary
($)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Option
Awards
($)(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(5)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
  Total ($) 

  Thomas L. Williams

  2022   1,387,500   5,800,687   4,282,828   3,780,697   3,044,860   151,597   18,448,169 

  Chief Executive Officer

  and Chairman of the Board

  2021   1,159,375   4,845,449   4,224,085   3,326,023   3,344,243   135,325   17,034,500 
  2020   1,159,375   5,350,280   2,992,950   3,230,087   5,986,427   143,742   18,862,861 

  Todd M. Leombruno

  2022   736,667   1,412,505   1,042,956   1,138,332   31,605   308,269   4,670,334 

  Executive Vice President

  and Chief Financial Officer

  2021   510,725   2,968,166   201,042   701,647   376,387   213,444   4,971,411 

  Lee C. Banks

  2022   1,112,500   2,624,120   1,936,799   2,018,734      244,187   7,936,340 

  Vice Chairman and President

 

  2021   971,250   2,213,292   1,931,105   1,792,662   1,051,869   224,943   8,185,121 
  2020   971,250   2,455,433   1,372,950   1,737,379   3,543,794   215,145   10,295,951 

  Jennifer A. Parmentier(7)

  2022   765,423   3,304,641   1,229,346   1,373,446      434,018   7,106,874 

  Chief Operating Officer

                                

  Andrew M. Weeks

  2022   636,283   1,261,838   558,342   898,658      301,171   3,656,292 

  Former Vice President and

  President - Engineered

  Materials Group

  2021   571,140   646,543   562,918   783,664      290,457   2,854,722 
  2020   571,140   688,038   384,413   648,957      638,204   2,930,752 
                                

 

(1)

IncludesFor fiscal year 2022, reflects increases in base salary effective September 1, 2021 for all Named Executive Officers, and for Mr. Leombruno and Ms. Parmentier mid-year increases effective February 1, 2022, to the following base salary amounts: $1,400,000 for Mr. Williams; $780,000 for Mr. Leombruno; $1,125,000 for Mr. Banks; $820,000 for Ms. Parmentier; and $643,300 for Mr. Weeks. Amounts also include amounts deferred under the Savings Restoration Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan for fiscal year 2019:2022:

Savings Restoration Plan: Mr. Williams—$25,000; Mr. Leombruno—$19,250; Mr. Banks—$25,000; Ms. Parmentier-$29,851; and Mr. Weeks—$26,053.

Savings Restoration Plan:Mr. Williams—$25,000; Ms. Suever—$25,895; Mr. Banks—$26,250; Mr. Malone—$25,520; and Ms. Parmentier—$26,820.

Executive Deferral Plan: Mr. Leombruno—$79,777

These amounts are also reported in the “Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year” column of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022 table on page 69.

Executive Deferral Plan:no amounts deferred.

These amounts are also reported in the “Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year” column of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2019 table on page 62.

 

(2)

For 2019,fiscal year 2022, these amounts consist of (i) the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of (i) LTIP Awards granted during fiscal year 20192022 to each of the Named Executive Officers;Officers, and (ii) a retention and recognition awardsaward of RSUs granted in the fiscal year 20192022 to Messrs. Banks and Malone and Ms. Parmentier with the following grant date fair value: Mr. Banks—$2,500,680; Mr. Malone—$1,000,605; and Ms. Parmentier—$1,000,605.Weeks. For the LTIP awards, the amounts do not reflect whether a Named Executive Officer has actually realized a financial benefit from the LTIP awards. The amounts were calculated by multiplying the closing price on the date of grant by the number of LTIP Awards received and assuming a payout of 100%. As described beginning on page 40,51, however, LTIP Award payouts will be calculated following the applicable three-year performance period and could range from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 200%. The grant date fair value of the LTIP Awards granted during fiscal year 20192022 at the maximum payout of 200% are: Mr. Williams—$10,346,010; Ms. Suever—11,601,374; Mr. Leombruno—$2,793,100;2,825,010; Mr. Banks—$4,655,062; Mr. Malone—$1,241,308; and5,248,240, Ms. Parmentier—$1,586,428.6,609,282; and Mr. Weeks—$1,512,950. Dividends in the form of dividend equivalent units will beare awarded as earned LTIP award shares for those LTIP awards beginning with the calendar yearyears 2019-20-21 performance period. Dividends are paid on the LTIP Awards awarded prior to the calendar yearyears 2019-20-21 performance period after the prior performance periods end and the shares are issued at which point they will be paid in proportion to the actual amount of shares earned for the applicable performance period.

 

(3)

Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for Stock Appreciation Rights granted in fiscal year 20192022 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of Stock Incentive grants. The amounts do not reflect whether a Named Executive Officer has actually realized a financial benefit from the award. The amounts were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

        

Fiscal Year

of Grant

 Participant     

Grant    

Date    

 

Type of    

Grant    

 

Risk-free    

Interest Rate    

 

Expected Life    

of Award    

 

Expected Dividend    

Yield of Stock    

 

Expected Volatility

of Stock

2019

 

 

 

Named Executive    

Officers    

 

 8/15/2018    

 

 annual grant  

 

 2.81%    

 

 5.68 years    

 

 1.92%    

 

 24.1%

 

 Fiscal Year

 of Grant

  Participant  Grant
Date
   Type of
Grant
   Risk-free
Interest Rate
   Expected Life
of Award
   Expected Dividend
Yield of Stock
   Expected Volatility
of Stock
 

 2022

  Named Executive Officers   8/11/2021    annual grant    0.81%    6.61 years    1.92%    34.4% 

During fiscal year 2022, no Stock Incentive awards were forfeited by any of the Named Executive Officers.

 

During fiscal year 2019, no Stock Incentive awards were forfeited by any of the Named Executive Officers.

2022 Proxy Statement61


Executive Compensation

 

(4)

Amounts consist of the following Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses with PGI Multiplier, if applicable, and Converted RONA Bonuses for fiscal year 2019,2022, which were paid in one or more installments with the final payments in August 2019:2021:

Target Incentive Bonus for fiscal year 2019: Mr. Williams—$1,625,000; Ms. Suever—$600,600; Mr. Banks—$900,000; Mr. Malone—$302,600; and Ms. Parmentier—$275,800.

Target Incentive Bonus for fiscal year 2022: Mr. Williams—$1,838,088; Mr. Leombruno—$540,173; Mr. Banks—$949,616; Ms. Parmentier—$633,015; and Mr. Weeks —$301,596.

General RONA Bonus for fiscal year 2019: Mr. Williams—$1,419,500; Ms. Suever—$451,381; Mr. Banks—$734,800; Mr. Malone—$329,701; and Ms. Parmentier—$295,611.General RONA Bonus for fiscal year 2022: Mr. Williams—$1,813,879; Mr. Leombruno—$509,847; Mr. Banks—$941,064; Ms. Parmentier— $617,544; and Mr. Weeks—$509,027.

Converted RONA Bonus for fiscal year 2022: Mr. Williams—$128,731; Mr. Leombruno—$88,312; Mr. Banks—$128,054; Ms. Parmentier— $122,886; and Mr. Weeks—$88,035.

Amount also includes the following amount deferred under the Executive Deferral Plan:

Executive Deferral Plan: Mr. Leombruno—$79,777

Converted RONA Bonus for fiscal year 2019:Mr. Williams—$104,395; Ms. Suever—$71,623; Mr. Banks—$103,834; Mr. Malone—$71,396; and Ms. Parmentier—$71,263.

 

(5)

Amounts consist of the change in annual actuarial present value of pension benefits for Messrs. Williams and Banks and Ms. Suever,Leombruno as also reported in the Pension Benefits for Fiscal Year 20192022 table. Mr. MaloneWeeks and Ms.��Parmentier do not have a benefit under our defined benefit pension plans. None of the Named Executive Officers received above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. Mr. Banks’ actuarial present value of pension benefits declined by $809.050 in Fiscal Year 2022.

 

(6)

The following table describes each component of the All Other Compensation column:

 

     
Name 

  Company Contributions  

  to  

  Defined Contribution  

  Plans (a)  

  

  Life Insurance  

  Premiums Paid  

  

  Dividend  

  Equivalents  

  on  

  RSUs (b)  

 

  Perquisites  

  (c)  

  

  Total “All Other 

  Compensation” 

   Company Contributions to
Defined Contribution Plans
(a)
   Life Insurance
Premiums Paid
   Dividend
Equivalents
on RSUs
(b)
   Perquisites
(c)
   

Total

“All Other
Compensation”

 

Thomas L. Williams

 

 

$17,117               

 

 

 

$81,254       

 

 

       $0

 

 

$63,545     

 

 

 

$161,916       

 

   15,226    8,000        128,371    151,597 

Catherine A. Suever

 

 

17,055               

 

 

 

44,251       

 

 

13,588

 

 

24,738     

 

 

 

99,632       

 

Todd M. Leombruno

   169,171    44,657        94,441    308,269 

Lee C. Banks

 

 

17,330               

 

 

 

53,408       

 

 

92,316

 

 

71,272     

 

 

 

234,326       

 

   15,431    29,635    66,388    132,733    244,187 

Robert W. Malone

 

 

651,081               

 

 

 

53,100       

 

 

46,168

 

 

33,965     

 

 

 

784,314       

 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

 

 

454,218               

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,035       

 

 

 

 

18,992

 

 

 

 

32,306     

 

 

 

 

 

 

540,551       

 

 

 

   209,495    38,169    26,564    159,790    434,018 

Andrew M. Weeks

   229,020    32,459    10,536    29,156    301,171 

 

 (a)

Amount consists of the following company contributions to our Defined Contribution Plans:

Retirement Savings Plan:Mr. Williams—$11,317; Ms. Suever—13,476; Mr. Leombruno—$10,990;12,863; Mr. Banks—$11,230;13,681; Ms. Parmentier-$21,546; and Mr. Malone—Weeks—$22,263; and Ms. Parmentier—$21,088.25,670.

Savings Restoration Plan:Mr. Williams—$5,800; Ms. Suever—1,750; Mr. Leombruno—$6,065;1,347; Mr. Banks—$6,100;1,750; Ms. Parmentier-$41,176; and Mr. Malone—Weeks—$35,696; and Ms. Parmentier—$32,887.44,597.

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program:Mr. Malone—Leombruno—$593,122;154,961; Ms. Parmentier- $146,772; and Ms. Parmentier—Mr. Weeks—$400,243.158,753.

 

 (b)

Reported in this column are cash dividends that Mr. Banks received as dividend equivalents on RSUs that he was granted in fiscal years 2017 and 2019, and cash dividends that Ms. SueverParmentier and Messrs. Banks and MaloneMr. Weeks received as dividend equivalents on RSUs that they were granted in Fiscal Years 2017 and 2019, and cash dividends that Ms. Parmentier received as dividend equivalents on RSUs that she was granted in Fiscal Yearfiscal year 2019.

 

 (c)

Reported in this column are amounts reimbursed or incurred by us with respect to: (i) executive long-term disability insurance premiums; and (ii) one or more of the following executive perquisites: (A) leased vehicle, including state sales tax if applicable; (B) spousal travel; (C) executive physicals; (D) matching gifts program andprogram; (E) corporate aircraft travel.travel; and (F) certain private club fees. The Named Executive Officers also use our loges, box seats or tickets to various entertainment venues. However, there is no incremental cost to us for their use of these loges, box seats and tickets. NoOther than the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of each of Messrs. Williams’, Banks’ and Leombruno’s personal use of the corporate aircraft of $88,983, $97,387 and $31,814, respectively, and Ms. Parmentier’s reimbursement of $69,639 for private club initiation fees, no Named Executive Officer received an executive perquisite in an amount that exceeds the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of executive perquisites received by the Named Executive Officer. We determine the incremental cost of the personal use of our corporate aircraft based on the variable operating costs to us, which includes: (i) landing, ramp, and parking fees and expenses; (ii) crew travel expenses; (iii) supplies and catering; (iv) aircraft fuel and oil expenses per hour of flight; (v) any customs, foreign permit, and similar fees; (vi) crew travel; and (vii) passenger ground transportation. Because our aircraft is used primarily for business travel, this methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as salaries of pilots and crew, purchase or lease costs of aircraft, and costs of maintenance and upkeep.

 

(7)

Ms. Parmentier was not a Named Executive Officer for Fiscal Years 2018in fiscal years 2020 and 2017.2021.

62LOGO


Executive Compensation

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2022

The following table sets forth information with respect tonon-equity and equity incentive plan awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2019.2022. The LTIP Awards RSUs and Stock Incentives listed below have been granted under our Amended 2016 Equity Plan.

 

            

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

     

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

          
Name 

Date

  

 Compensation 
Committee
Action Date

(If Different

than Grant
Date)

 

Estimated Future Payouts

UnderNon-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
 Underlying 

Options

(#)

 

 Exercise 
or Base
Price of
Option

Awards
($/Sh)

 

Grant

Date

  Fair Value of  
Stock and
Option

Awards

($)

 Grant Date 

Compensation
Committee
Action Date

(If Different
than Grant
Date)

 

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

 Maximum
($)
    Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 

Maximum

(#)

 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 

Grant

Date

Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards

($)

 

 Threshold 
($)

 

 

 Target 
($)

 

  

 Maximum 
($)

 

 

 Threshold 
(#)

 

 

 Target 
(#)

 

 

 Maximum 
(#)

 

Thomas L. Williams

                                        
Target Incentive Bonus  8/15/2018   0  812,500  1,625,000        8/11/2021         980,000   1,960,000                       
General RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  1,062,500  (1)        8/11/2021         1,190,000   (1)                        
Converted RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  78,140  (1)        8/11/2021         83,700   (1)                        
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)  1/23/2019        0 32,989 65,978   5,173,005(2)

LTIP Award (CY 22-23-24)(3)

  1/26/2022                    18,480   36,960           5,800,687(2) 
Stock Incentives  1/23/2019           81,180 166.49 2,980,930      8/11/2021                            51,700   296.00   4,282,828 

Catherine A. Suever

              

Todd M. Leombruno

                          
Target Incentive Bonus  8/15/2018   0  300,300  600,600        8/11/2021         288,000   576,000                       
General RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  337,860  (1)        8/11/2021         324,000   (1)                        
Converted RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  53,610  (1)        8/11/2021         79,900   (1)                        
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)  1/23/2019        0 8,906 17,812   1,396,550(2)

LTIP Award (CY 22-23-24)(3)

  1/26/2022                    4,500   9,000           1,412,505(2) 
Stock Incentives  1/23/2019           24,050 166.49 804,902   8/11/2021                            12,590   296.00   1,042,956 

Lee C. Banks

                                        
Target Incentive Bonus  8/15/2018   0  450,000  900,000        8/11/2021         506,300   1,012,600                       
General RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  550,000  (1)        8/11/2021         618,750   (1)                        
Converted RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  77,720  (1)        8/11/2021         83,260   (1)                        
RSUs (4)  8/15/2018  7/24/2018       15,020 15,020   2,500,680    
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)  1/23/2019        0 14,843 29,686   2,327,531(2)

LTIP Award (CY 22-23-24)(3)

  1/26/2022                    8,360   16,720           2,624,120(2) 
Stock Incentives  1/23/2019           36,530 166.49 1,341,382      8/11/2021                            23,380   296.00   1,936,799 

Robert W. Malone

              

Jennifer A. Parmentier

                          
Target Incentive Bonus  8/15/2018   0  151,300  218,400        8/11/2021         337,500   675,000                       
General RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  242,000  (1)        8/11/2021         412,500   (1)                        
Converted RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  53,440  (1)        8/11/2021         57,420   (1)                        
RSUs (4)  8/15/2018         6,010 6,010   1,000,605      
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)  1/23/2019        0 3,958 7,916     620,654(2)

LTIP Award (CY19-20-21)(3)

  8/11/2021                    763   1,526           225,848(2) 

LTIP Award (CY20-21-22)(3)

  8/11/2021                    2,067   4,134           611,832(2) 

LTIP Award (CY21-22-23)(3)

  8/11/2021                    2,714   5,428           803,344(2) 

LTIP Award (CY 22-23-24)(3)

  1/26/2022                    5,300   10,600           1,663,617(2) 
Stock Incentives  1/23/2019            9,740 166.49   357,653      8/11/2021                            14,840   296.00   1,229,346 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

              

Andrew M. Weeks

                          
Target Incentive Bonus  8/15/2018   0  146,300  292,600        8/11/2021         160,800   321,600                       
General RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  234,000  (1)        8/11/2021         257,320   (1)                        
Converted RONA Bonus  8/15/2018   0  53,270  (1)        8/11/2021         57,240   (1)                        
RSUs (4)  8/15/2018         6,010 6,010   1,000,605      
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)  1/23/2019        0 2,685 5,370     421,035(2)

LTIP Award (CY 22-23-24)(3)

  1/26/2022                    2,410   4,820           756,475(2) 
Stock Incentives  1/23/2019           6,620 166.49 1,102,164        8/11/2021                            6,740   296.00   558,342 
LTIP Award (CY17-18-19) (5)  2/1/2019        0 351 702       57,701(2)
LTIP Award (CY18-19-20) (5)  2/1/2019        0 677 1,354     111,292(2)
LTIP Award (CY19-20-21) (3)(5)  2/1/2019        0 1,236 2,472     203,186(2)

Restricted Stock Units(4)

  1/26/2022                          1,610         505,363 

 

(1)

There are no maximum amounts for General RONA Bonuses or Converted RONA Bonuses. General RONA Bonuses and Converted RONA Bonuses are calculated as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23.35.

(2)

Calculated assuming a payout of 100% as described in footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

2022 Proxy Statement63


Executive Compensation

(3)

IncludesDoes not include earned LTIP award shares in the form of dividend equivalent units for those LTIPs awarded for the calendar yearyears 2019-20-212020-21-22,2021-22-23 and 2022-23-24 performance period.periods in the following amounts: Mr. Williams-15; Mr. Leombruno-37; Mr. Banks-69; Ms. Parmentier-305; and Mr. Weeks-19.

(4)

Messrs. Banks and Malone and Ms. ParmentierMr. Weeks received RSUsan RSU granted on January 26, 2022. In connection with his retirement on August 15, 2018.

(5)

Ms. Parmentier received additional target awards under her LTIP Awards due to her promotion to Vice President and President – Motion Systems Group on February 1, 2019.31, 2022, Mr. Weeks forfeited these RSUs.

The elements of executive compensation included in each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022 on page 5461 and the compensation programs under which the grants described in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192022 table above were made are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.

64LOGO


Executive Compensation

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT JUNEOutstanding Equity Awards at June 30, 20192022

The following table sets forth information with respect to Stock Incentives and stock awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of June 30, 2019.2022.

 

   Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
    Exercisable    

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
    Unexercisable    

 

Option
Exercise
Price

($)

  Option
    Expiration    
Date
 

Equity
Incentive

Plan

Awards:
Number

of

Shares,
Unearned
Units or

Other

Rights
    That Have    

Not

Vested

(#)

 

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(1)

 

  Thomas L. Williams

 0 33,422(2)  116.46  1/31/2025 —            —      
  67,200 0      113.23  8/11/2025 —            —      
  26,240 0      113.19  8/12/2024 —            —      
  34,840 0      106.18  8/13/2023 —            —      
  70,333 35,167(3)  124.36  8/16/2026 —            —      
  30,780 61,560(4)  158.79  8/15/2027 —            —      
  0 81,180(5)  166.49  8/14/2028 —            —      
   —     —       35,470(6)  6,030,255 
   —     —       29,060(7)  4,940,491 
   —     —       32,989(8)  5,608,460 

  Catherine A. Suever

 2,080 0      62.35  8/10/2020 —            —      
  5,200 0      69.10  8/16/2021 —            —      
  5,230 0      81.86  8/14/2022 —            —      
  6,660 0      106.18  8/13/2023 —            —      
  5,010 0      113.19  8/12/2024 —            —      
  4,820 0      113.23  8/11/2025 —            —      
  3,667   1,833(3)  124.36  8/16/2026 —            —      
  8,017 16,033(4)  158.79  8/15/2027 —            —      
  0 21,920(5)  166.49  8/14/2028 —            —      
   —     —       7,833(6)  1,331,688 
   —     —       7,570(7)  1,286,976 
          8,906(8)  1,514,109 
   —     —       4,300(9)  731,043 

  Lee C. Banks

 0 22,281(2)  116.46  1/31/2025 —            —      
  44,800 0      113.23  8/11/2025 —            —      
  26,240 0      113.19  8/12/2024 —            —      
  34,840 0      106.18  8/13/2023 —            —      
  35,990 0      81.86  8/14/2022 —            —      
  34,100 17,050(3)  124.36  8/16/2026 —            —      
  14,750 29,500(4)  158.79  8/15/2027 —            —      
  0 36,530(5)  166.49  8/14/2028 —            —      
   —     —       17,200(6)  2,924,172 
   —     —       13,930(7)  2,368,239 
   —     —       14,843(8)  2,523,458 
          14,194(10)  2,413,122 
   —     —       15,020(11)  2,553,550 

  Robert W. Malone

 8,680 0      113.23  8/11/2025 —            —      
  2,920 0      113.19  8/12/2024 —            —      
  3,870 0      106.18  8/13/2023 —            —      
  6,607   3,303(3)  124.36  8/16/2026 —            —      
  3,847   7,693(4)  158.79  8/15/2027 —            —      
  0   9,740(5)  166.49  8/14/2028 —            —      
   —     —       4,614(6)  784,426 
   —     —       3,630(7)  617,136 
   —     —       3,958(8)  672,900 
   —     —       8,600(12)  1,462,086 
   —     —       6,010(13)  1,021,760 

  Jennifer A. Parmentier

 587    1,173  81.86  8/14/2022 —            —      
  1,653       827  106.18  8/13/2023 —            —      
  2,330 0      113.19  8/12/2024 —            —      
  8,680 0      113.23  8/11/2025 —            —      
  6,607   3,303(3)  124.36  8/16/2026 —            —      
  2,614   5,226(4)  158.79  8/15/2027 —            —      
  0   6,620(5)  166.49  8/14/2028 —            —      
   —     —       3,681(6)  625,807 
   —     —       3,147(7)  535,021 
   —     —       3,921(8)  666,609 
            6,010(13)

 

  

 

1,021,760

 

 

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  Name 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested (#)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested ($)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not

Vested

(#)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not

Vested

($)(1)

 

  Thomas L. Williams

  105,500      124.36   8/16/2026             
  92,340      158.79   8/15/2027             
  81,180      166.49   8/14/2028             
  59,120   29,560(2)   158.90   8/13/2029             
  25,564   51,126(3)   209.56   8/11/2030             
     51,700(4)   296.00   8/10/2031             
                    27,715(5)   6,819,276 
                    19,750(6)   4,859,488 
                     18,632(7)   4,584,404 

  Todd. M. Leombruno

  410      113.19   8/12/2024             
  1,230      113.23   8/11/2025             
  1,410      124.36   8/16/2026             
  4,040      158.79   8/15/2027             
  3,410      166.49   8/14/2028             
  2,713   1,357(2)   158.90   8/13/2029             
  1,217   2,433(3)   209.56   8/11/2030             
     12,590(4)   296.00   8/10/2031             
                    1,267(5)   311,745 
                    3,501(5)   861,421 
                    5,640(6)   1,387,722 
                     4,537(7)   1,116,329 

  Lee C. Banks

  44,800      113.23   8/11/2025             
  51,150      124.36   8/16/2026             
  44,250      158.79   8/15/2027             
  36,530      166.49   8/14/2028             
  27,120   13,560(2)   158.90   8/13/2029             
  11,687   23,373(3)   209.56   8/11/2030             
     23,380(4)   296.00   8/10/2031             

 

2022 Proxy Statement65


Executive Compensation

                    12,719(5)   3,129,510 
                    9,021(6)   2,219,617 
                    8,429(7)   2,073,955 
               15,020(8)   3,695,671       

  Jennifer A. Parmentier

  7,840      158.79   8/15/2027             
  6,620      166.49   8/14/2028             
  7,593   3,797(2)   158.90   8/13/2029             
  3,407   6,813(3)   209.56   8/11/2030             
     14,840(4)   296.00   8/10/2031             
                    3,564(5)   876,922 
                    2,098(5)   516,213 
                    2,636(6)   648,589 
                    2,755(6)   677,868 
                    5,343(7)   1,314,645 
               6,010(9)   1,478,760       

  Andrew M. Weeks

  7,593   3,797(2)   158.90   8/13/2029             
  3,407   6,813(3)   209.56   8/11/2030             
     6,740(4)   296.00   8/10/2031             
                    3,564(5)   876,922 
                    2,636(6)   648,588 
                    2,429(7)   597,655 
               1,610(10)   396,140       

(1)

The market value is calculated by multiplying the closing price of our Common Stock on June 30, 2019, $170.01,2022, $246.05, by the number of shares.

(2)

Represents a Stock Incentive granted on February 1, 2015. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grant will vest on February 1, 2020.

(3)

Represents Stock Incentives granted on August 17, 2016.13, 2019. The Stock Incentives vest in three equal annual installments beginning August 17, 2017.13, 2020.

(4)(3)

Represents Stock Incentives granted on August 16, 2017.11, 2020. The Stock Incentives vest in three equal annual installments beginning August 16, 2018.11, 2021.

(5)(4)

Represents Stock Incentives granted on August 15, 2018.10, 2021. The Stock Incentives vest in three equal annual installments beginning August 15, 2019.10, 2022.

(6)(5)

Assumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of the target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued employment through the end of the performance period (December 31, 2019)2022), actual payouts under the calendar yearyears 2017-18-19 LTIP Awards will be in common shares issued in April 2020 following the Committee’s certification of our performance results, subject to the Committee’s exercise of any discretion to reduce the amount payable and the Committee’s authorization of payment.

(7)

Assumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of the target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued employment through the end of the performance period (December 31, 2020), actual payouts under the calendar year2018-19-202020-21-22 LTIP Awards will be in common shares to be issued in April 2021 following the Committee’s certification of our performance results, subject to the Committee’s exercise of any discretion to reduce the amount payable and the Committee’s authorization of payment.

(8)

Assumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of the target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued employment through the end of the performance period (December 31, 2021), actual payouts under the calendar year2019-20-21 LTIP Awards will be in common shares to be issued in April 20222023 following the Committee’s certification of our performance results, subject to the Committee’s exercise of any discretion to reduce the amount payable and the Committee’s authorization of payment. These amounts include the dividend equivalent units for LTIP awards beginning January 2019.2020. Ms. Parmentier’s target LTIP award amounts reflect additional shares awarded to Ms. Parmentier as a result of her promotion on August 9, 2021.

(9)(6)

Represents two grantsAssumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of 2,150 eachthe target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued employment through the end of Restricted Stock Units,the performance period (December 31, 2023), actual payouts under the calendar years 2021-22-23 LTIP Awards will be in common shares to be issued in April 2024 following the Committee’s certification of our performance results, subject to the Committee’s exercise of any discretion to reduce the amount payable and the Committee’s authorization of payment. These amounts include the dividend equivalent units for LTIP awards beginning January 2020. Ms. Parmentier’s target LTIP award amounts reflect additional shares awarded on January 25, 2017, and April 19, 2017, respectively, to Ms. Suever.Parmentier as a result of her promotion on August 9, 2021.

(7)

Assumes that we meet our target performance goals and payout will be at 100% of the target LTIP Award value. Assuming continued full-time employment through the grantsend of the performance period (December 31, 2024), actual payouts under the calendar years 2022-23-24 LTIP Awards will vest onbe in common shares to be issued in April 2025 following the Committee’s certification of our performance results, subject to the Committee’s exercise of any discretion to reduce the amount payable and the Committee’s authorization of payment. These amounts include the dividend equivalent units for LTIP awards beginning January 25, 2020 and April 19, 2020, respectively.

(10)

Represents the grant of 14,194 Restricted Stock Units, awarded on August 17, 2016, to Mr. Banks. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grants will vest on August 17, 2022.

(11)(8)

Represents the grant of 15,020 Restricted Stock Units, awarded on August 15, 2018 to Mr. Banks. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grants will vestThis grant vested on August 5, 2022.

(12)

Represents the grant of 8,600 Restricted Stock Units, awarded January 25, 2017, to Mr. Malone. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grants will vest on January 25, 2022.

(13)(9)

Represents the grant of 6,010 Restricted Stock Units, awarded August 15, 2018, to Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier. Assuming continued full-time employment, the grants will vestThis grant vested on August 5, 2022.

(10)

Represents the grant of 1,610 Restricted Stock Units, awarded January 26, 2022 to Mr. Weeks. These awards, which were scheduled to vest on January 26, 2025, were forfeited by Mr. Weeks upon his retirement on August 31, 2022.

66LOGO


Executive Compensation

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2022

The following table sets forth information with respect to Stock Incentives that were exercised during fiscal year 20192022 and common shares issued under LTIP Awards and RSUs that vested for the Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2019.2022.

 

  
  

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
     Option Awards      Stock Awards 
Name  

   Number of Shares          

Acquired on       

Exercise       

(#)       

  

Value Realized on     

Exercise     

($)(1)     

  

  Number of Shares  

Acquired on

Vesting

(#)

   

   Value Realized on   

Vesting

($)(2)

   

Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise

(#)

   Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)(1)
      

Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting

(#)

   Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(2)
 

Thomas L. Williams

  

0       

  

0     

  

 

32,109

 

  

 

4,788,737          

 

   67,200    14,281,344   

 

   64,278    17,464,333 

Catherine A. Suever

  

0       

  

0     

  

 

5,694

 

  

 

849,204          

 

Todd M. Leombruno

          

 

   7,199    1,955,968 

Lee C. Banks

  

0       

  

0     

  

 

32,520

 

  

 

4,850,033          

 

          

 

   43,115    12,064,086 

Robert W. Malone

  

0       

  

0     

  

 

7,837

 

  

 

1,168,811          

 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

  

0       

 

  

0     

 

  

 

 

6,295

 

 

 

  

 

 

938,837          

 

 

 

          

 

   9,079    2,466,764 

Andrew M. Weeks

   9,740    1,557,192   

 

   10,981    3,140,530 

 

(1)

Calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquiredexercised by the difference between the exercise price and closing price of our common stock on the exercise date.

(2)

Calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired by the closing price of our common stock on the applicable vesting date.

2022 Proxy Statement67


Executive Compensation

PENSION BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019Pension Benefits for Fiscal Year 2022

The following table sets forth the actuarial present value of the benefits accumulated by each of the Named Executive Officers under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Program.

 

NamePlan Name

Number of Years    

of Credited    

Service    

(#)(1)    

  Present Value of  

Accumulated

Benefit

($)(2)

  Payments During  

Last Fiscal Year
($)

Thomas L. Williams

Pension Plan

Pension Restoration Plan

Supplemental Retirement Program

15.6       

14.9       

15.6       

599,492       

5,846,704       

17,201,906       

0

0

0

Catherine A. Suever

Pension Plan

Pension Restoration Plan

Supplemental Retirement Program

32.1       

31.3       

32.1       

1,306,387       

3,171,889       

3,687,467       

0

0

0

Lee C. Banks

Pension Plan

Pension Restoration Plan

Supplemental Retirement Program

27.6       

27.6       

27.6       

907,481       

7,042,993       

6,576,685       

0

0

0

Robert W. Malone (3)    

Pension Plan

Pension Restoration Plan

Supplemental Retirement Program

—       

—       

—       

0    

0    

0    

0

0

0

Jennifer A. Parmentier (3)  

Pension Plan

Pension Restoration Plan

Supplemental Retirement Program

—       

—       

—       

0    

0    

0    

0

0

0

  Name Plan Name 

Number of Years
of Credited
Service

(#)(1)

   

Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit

($)(2)

   Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
 

 

  Thomas L. Williams

 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

747,225

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Restoration Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

5,923,929

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

29,352,478

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Program

 

              

 

  Todd M. Leombruno

 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.1

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

693,636

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Restoration Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.1

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,344,259

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

Program

 

              

 

  Lee C. Banks

 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.6

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,004,696

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Restoration Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.6

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

9,837,015

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.6

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

7,472,061

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Program

 

              

 

  Jennifer A. Parmentier(3)

 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Restoration Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Program

 

              

 

  Andrew M. Weeks(3)

 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Restoration Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Program

 

              

 

(1)

Credited Service in the Pension Restoration Plan is frozen as of the date the Named Executive Officer becomes 100% vested in the Supplementalsupplemental Retirement Program (typically age 60).

 

(2)

The present value of the accumulated benefits is calculated under each plan using the following assumptions: (i) a discount rate of 3.28%4.36% for the Pension Plan; (ii) a discount rate of 3.04%4.19% for each of the Pension Restoration Plan and Supplemental Retirement Program; (iii) nopre-retirement decrements; and (iv) retirement at age 65.

For the Pension Plan, additional assumptions include: (i) participants elect a life annuity; and (ii) theRP-2006Pri-2012 Mortality Table projected generationally with ScaleMP-2018.MP-2021.

For the Pension Restoration Plan, using each Named Executive Officer’s participant elections under the Pension Restoration Plan, additional assumptions include: (i) calculating lump sums using the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue CodeCode; and (ii) discount segment rates of 2.72%3.23%, 3.76%4.59% and 4.33%4.69%.

For the Supplemental Retirement Program, using each Named Executive Officer’s participant elections under the Supplemental Retirement Program, additional assumptions include: (i) calculating lump sums using the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (ii) a discount rate of 2.89%2.41%.

 

(3)

Mr. MaloneMr.Weeks and Ms. Parmentier are not eligible to participate in these plans.

The Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Program are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.

68LOGO


Executive Compensation

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022

The following table sets forth the contributions, earnings, withdrawals/distributions and aggregate balances for the Named Executive Officers participating in the Savings Restoration Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program during fiscal year 2019.2022.

 

     
Name Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(1)
  Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(2)
  

Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year

($)

  

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
($)

  

Aggregate Balance at
  Last Fiscal Year

  End ($)

   

Executive
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year
($)(1)

   

Registrant
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year
($)(2)

   

Aggregate
Earnings

in Last
Fiscal Year
($)(3)

 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End
($)(4)
 

Thomas L. Williams

                      

Savings Restoration Plan

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

5,800

 

 

 

51,465

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

782,178(3)

 

   25,000    1,750    (222,741      1,122,927 

Executive Deferral Plan

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,518

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

24,668    

           (2,870      31,998 

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0    

                   

Catherine A. Suever

        

Todd M. Leombruno

              

Savings Restoration Plan

 

 

25,895

 

 

 

6,065

 

 

 

31,732

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

763,521(3)

 

   19,250    1,348    (99,560      541,332 

Executive Deferral Plan

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

16,813

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

275,834    

   79,777        (44,799      232,103 

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0    

       154,961    (64,567      325,934 

Lee C. Banks

                      

Savings Restoration Plan

 

 

26,250

 

 

 

6,100

 

 

 

61,561

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,327,978(3)

 

   25,000    1,750    (381,116      1,875,669 

Executive Deferral Plan

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

326,848

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

8,618,634    

           (1,952,632      10,936,901 

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0    

Robert W. Malone

        

Savings Restoration Plan

 

 

25,520

 

 

 

35,696

 

 

 

5,458

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

173,632(3)

 

Executive Deferral Plan

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0    

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program

 

 

0

 

 

 

593,122

 

 

 

84,406

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3,323,043    

                   

Jennifer A. Parmentier

                      

Savings Restoration Plan

 

 

26,820

 

 

 

32,887

 

 

 

13,105

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

194,584(3)

 

   29,851    41,176    (85,164  

 

   425,392 

Executive Deferral Plan

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0    

                   

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program

 

 

0

 

 

 

400,243

 

 

 

68,626

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,773,014    

   

 

   146,772    (599,995  

 

   2,911,697 

Andrew M. Weeks

              

Savings Restoration Plan

   26,053    44,597    (174,108      562,899 

Executive Deferral Plan

                   

Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program

       158,753    (601,322      3,574,574 

 

(1)

For each of the Named Executive Officers, amounts are included in the “Salary” columnand in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns and referenced in footnotefootnotes 1 and 4, respectively, of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

(2)

Amounts are included along with our contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan, which is a qualified deferred compensation plan, in the “Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans” column in the All Other Compensation components table in footnote 6 of the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019.2022.

(3)

Amounts in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2022, because we do not offer above-market or preferential earnings under our nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

(4)

Includes the following amounts that were deferred during fiscal year 20182022 under the Savings Restoration Plan: Mr. Williams—$25,000; Ms. Suever—25,000, Mr. Leombruno—$24,612;19,250, Mr. Banks—$26,250;25,000, Ms. Parmentier—$25,130;29,851 and Mr. Malone—Weeks—$0.26,053.

The Savings Restoration Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan, and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. The investment options under each of the plans are identical. During fiscal year 2019,2022, there were up to eleven investment funds that a Named Executive Officer could choose with annual rates of return for the year ended June 30, 2019,2022, ranging from (13.26)%(35.96%) to 12.08%0.21%. Under the plans, participants have the ability to change their investments at any time.

2022 Proxy Statement69


Executive Compensation

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

AT JUNEPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control at June 30, 20192022

Each of the Named Executive Officers may be entitled to payments under our executive compensation program upon a termination of employment or a change in control. The events which may trigger these payments include death, long-term disability, retirement, termination for cause, termination without cause, resignation, change in control or a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control. The following narratives and tables describe the payments the Named Executive Officers may receive under the written terms of our executive compensation program plans and arrangements as in effect on June 30, 2019,2022, for each triggering event as if the triggering event occurred on June 30, 2019.2022.

During fiscal year 2016 we adopted new Change in Control Agreements and amended our Executive Deferral Plan to exclude taxgross-ups and to eliminate “modified single trigger” vesting acceleration on a change in control; however, each of the Named Executive Officers became an executive officer prior to our implementation of these changes and, therefore, continue to have agreements that contain taxgross-ups on a change in control and modified single trigger vesting acceleration on a change in control.

For each of the termination of employment scenarios described in this section, the estimated potential payments and benefits that might be received by each Named Executive Officer is displayed in the table that immediately follows that description.

Payments Generally Available

A Named Executive Officer will generally receive the following upon termination of employment:

 

base salary earned but not yet paid as of the date of termination;

 

Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses (with the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable), and Converted RONA Bonuses earned but not yet paid as of the date of termination;

 

LTIP Award payouts for the most recently completed three-year performance period not yet paid as of the date of termination;

 

amounts accrued and vested under the Pension Plan, the Pension Restoration Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Program as of the date of termination, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement;

 

vested account balances under the Retirement Savings Plan, the Savings Restoration Plan, the Executive Deferral Plan and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program as of the date of termination, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement; and

 

any accrued and unused vacation pay as of the date of termination.

The Committee may, however, reduce any payments of a Target Incentive Bonus, General RONA Bonus (with the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable), or LTIP Award payout in its sole discretion, up to and including a reduction to zero.

In determining the amounts reflected in the following tables, we used the following general assumptions and principles.

 

We assumed that each of the triggering events occurred on June 30, 2019.2022. This includes our assumption that, upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control, the qualifying termination and change in control both occurred on June 30, 2019.2022.

We did not include amounts for base salaries, Target Incentive Bonuses, General RONA Bonuses (including the PG RONA Multiplier if applicable), or Converted RONA Bonuses in the following tables because the amounts are already earned and are not affected by the triggering events, which are assumed to occur on June 30, 2019.2022.

 

Amounts were calculated based on each Named Executive Officer’s age, compensation and years of service as of June 30, 2019.2022.

 

All present values of pension amounts shown for the Pension Plan assume a 3.28%4.36% discount rate, theRP-2006Pri-2012 Mortality Table projected generationally with ScaleMP-2018,MP-2021, and assume that the annuity payment elected is 50% joint and survivor.

70LOGO


Executive Compensation

 

With the exception of the values for the Supplemental Retirement Program in the “Change in Control” and “Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control” columns, all lump sum values of pension amounts shown assume the following:

 

for the Pension Restoration Plan, segment rates (afterphase-in) of 2.72%3.23%, 3.76%4.59% and 4.33%4.69%, and the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code; and

 

for the Supplemental Retirement Program, a 2.89%2.41% discount rate and the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

We did not include amounts for account balances in the Retirement Savings Plan because this plan is available to all salaried employees. We did not include amounts for account balances under the Savings Restoration Plan and the Executive Deferral Plan because these amounts, which are reported under the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192022 table on page 62,69 would not be increased in connection with any triggering event.

Payments upon Death

Upon the death of a Named Executive Officer, in addition to the “Payments Generally Available” described above, the estate or beneficiary of the Named Executive Officer will receive the following:

 

accelerated vesting of all outstanding Stock Incentives;

 

for Stock Incentives granted on or before August 11, 2010, and for Stock Incentives granted on or after August 17, 2011, if the Named Executive Officer is not retirement eligible at the time of death, retention of all outstanding Stock Incentives for the earlier of (i) two years after the Named Executive Officer’s death or (ii) the expiration date listed in the grant letter;

 

for Stock Incentives granted on or after August 17, 2011, if the Named Executive Officer is retirement eligible at the time of death, retention of all outstanding Stock Incentives until the expiration date listed in the grant letter;

 

accelerated vesting of the unvested portion of the Named Executive Officer’s account under our Executive Deferral Plan;

 

account balance in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program provided the Named Executive Officer has completed 60 calendar months of service at his or her date of death;

 

pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar years2017-18-192020-21-22,2021-22-23 and2018-19-202022-23-24 performance periods to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the full number of calendar quarters of continuous employment during the2017-18-19 and2018-19-20 calendar year performance periods;

pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar year2019-20-21 performance period to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the full number of months of continuous employment during the2019-20-212020-21-22,2021-22-23 and 2022-23-24 calendar yearyears performance period;periods; and

 

death benefits under the Officer Life Insurance Plan as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23.57.

In determining the amounts payable upon death reported in the following tables, the following assumptions and principles were used;used:

 

To calculate the estimated value of the LTIP Awards, we assumed a payout of 100% of thepro-rated LTIP Award target amount and used our closing stock price on June 30, 2019, $170.01.2022, $246.05. Because the payout of the LTIP Awards is dependent upon our performance against the Peer Group companies during the three-year performance period, a Named Executive Officer’s actual payout could range from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 200% of the Named Executive Officer’spro-rated LTIP Award target amount.

 

The death benefit payable under the Officer Life Insurance Plan is funded through individual life insurance policies owned by each of the Named Executive Officers that would be paid by the insurance company issuing the policy.

 

Officer

 

Accelerated 
Vesting of 
Stock 
Incentives 

 

 

Accelerated 
Vesting of 
Restricted 
Stock Units 

 

 

Pension 
Plan 

 

 

Pension 
Restoration 
Plan 

 

 

Supplemental 
Retirement 
Program 

 

 

LTIP
Awards

 

 

Defined
Contribution
Supplemental 
Retirement
Program

 

 

Officer
Life
 Insurance 
Death
Benefit

 

 

Totals

 

 Accelerated
Vesting
of Stock
Incentives
 Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units
 Pension
Plan
 Pension
Restoration
Plan
 Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 LTIP
Awards
 Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 Officer
Life
Insurance
Death
Benefits
 Totals 

Thomas L. Williams

 

3,395,122

 

 

302,644 

 

2,512,867

 

21,484,239

 

8,430,201 

 

 

3,400,000

 

39,525,073 

  4,441,742      393,493   3,477,720   29,706,999   8,112,473      3,400,000   49,532,427 

Catherine A. Suever

 

     83,676

 

   731,043

 

575,448 

 

1,328,817

 

  6,492,379

 

2,003,143 

 

 

3,003,200

 

14,217,706 

Todd M. Leombruno

  207,043      286,686   660,198      1,671,500   325,934   2,880,000   6,031,361 

Lee C. Banks

 

1,971,480

 

4,966,672

 

357,294 

 

2,288,816

 

12,460,621

 

4,041,506 

 

 

4,000,000

 

30,086,389 

  2,034,635   3,695,671   473,185   5,018,532   13,969,201   3,717,734      4,500,000   33,408,958 

Robert W. Malone

 

   150,782

 

2,483,846

 

 

 

 

1,074,407 

 

3,323,043

 

1,815,000

 

  8,847,078 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

   306,969

 

1,021,760

 

 

 

 

   900,118 

 

1,773,014

 

1,582,500

 

  5,584,361 

  579,515   1,478,761            1,824,174   2,911,697   3,000,000   9,794,147 

Andrew M. Weeks

  579,515   396,141            1,055,063   3,574,574   1,929,900   7,535,193 

2022 Proxy Statement71


Executive Compensation

Payments upon Long-Term Disability

Upon the long-term disability of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above and the “Payments Upon Death” described above, except that:

 

(i)

the term for all outstanding Stock Incentives will continue for the remainder of theirten-year terms;

 

(ii)

the account balance in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program will be paid in a single lump sum as of the date of disability; and

 

(iii)

the Named Executive Officer will not receive death benefits under the Officer Life Insurance Plan until death subsequently occurs.

In addition, the Named Executive Officer will receive the following:

 

monthly benefits under the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan;

 

six months of premium payments for medical and dental insurance based on the applicable COBRA rates for the Named Executive Officer; and

 

for those Named Executive Officers who were participants prior to January 1, 2008, premium payments under the Officer Life Insurance Plan for the greater of ten years from commencement of plan participation or the number of years until the Named Executive Officer reaches age 65. For those Named Executive Officers who became participants on or after January 1, 2008, the participant will receive premium payments under the Officer Life Insurance Plan until retirement up to age 65.

The benefit in the following table for each of the Named Executive Officers under the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan represents one year of long term disability benefits. The disability benefit payable under the plan is funded through group and individual long-term disability insurance policies owned by each of the Named Executive Officers that would be paid by the insurance company issuing the policies.

 

           

Officer

 

Accelerated 
Vesting of 
Stock 
Incentives 

 

 

Accelerated 
Vesting of 
Restricted 
Stock Units 

 

 

Pension
Plan

 

 

Pension 
Restoration 
Plan 

 

 

Supplemental 
Retirement 
Program 

 

 

LTIP
Awards

 

 

Defined 
Contribution 
Supplemental 
Retirement 
Program 

 

 

Executive 
Long-
Term 
Disability 
Benefit 

 

 

Medical 
and 
Dental 
Benefit 

 

 

Officer 
Life 
Insurance 
Premiums 

 

 

Totals

 

 Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Incentives
 Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units
 Pension
Plan
 Pension
Restoration
Plan
 Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 LTIP
Awards
 Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 Executive
Long-Term
Disability
Benefit
 Medical
and
Dental
Benefit
 Officer
Life
Insurance
Premiums
 Totals 

Thomas L. Williams

 

3,395,122

 

 

   621,388 

 

5,225,679

 

22,658,045

 

8,430,201 

 

 

396,000 

 

  6,558 

 

40,531

 

40,773,524 

  4,441,742      796,790   7,235,987   31,387,158   8,112,473      396,000   7,632   8,000   52,385,782 

Catherine A. Suever

 

     83,676

 

731,043

 

1,304,219 

 

2,856,363

 

  5,653,245

 

2,003,143 

 

 

396,000 

 

  3,198 

 

20,495

 

13,051,382 

Todd M. Leombruno

  207,043      554,130   1,729,829      1,671,500   325,934   420,000   12,078   44,657   4,965,171 

Lee C. Banks

 

1,971,480

 

4,966,672

 

   789,318 

 

5,756,902

 

12,081,893

 

4,041,506 

 

 

396,000 

 

  5,163 

 

28,254

 

30,037,188 

  2,034,635   3,695,671   1,029,516   12,232,122   11,187,951   3,717,734      396,000   12,078   29,635   34,335,342 

Robert W. Malone

 

   150,782

 

2,483,846

 

 

 

 

1,074,407 

 

3,323,043

 

420,000 

 

10,158 

 

38,218

 

  7,500,454 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

   306,969

 

1,021,760

 

 

 

 

   900,118 

 

1,773,014

 

420,000 

 

10,248 

 

42,542

 

  4,474,651 

  579,515   1,478,761            1,824,174   2,911,697   420,000   12,066   38,169   7,264,382 

Andrew M. Weeks

  579,515   396,141            1,055,063   3,574,574   420,000   3,702   32,459   6,061,454 

Payments upon Retirement

Upon the retirement of a Named Executive Officer at (A) age 65 or older, or (B) age 60 or older with at least ten years of service, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above and the “Payments Upon Death” described above, except that:

 

(i)

the vesting schedule in all outstanding Stock Incentives will continue as if employed;

 

(ii)

the term for all outstanding Stock Incentives will continue for the remainder of theirten-year terms;

 

(iii)

if the Named Executive Officer is (A) age 65 or older, or (B) age 60 or older with at least ten years of service and 12 months of continuous employment during the performance periods, he or she will receive a full LTIP Award payout for calendar years2017-18-19,2020-21-22,2018-19-20,2021-22-23 and2019-20-212022-23-24 performance periods, to be determined at the end of the performance periods, as if he or she had remained continuously employed through the end of the performance periods; and

(iv)

the Named Executive Officer will not receive death benefits under the Officer Life Insurance Plan unless death subsequently occurs.

72LOGO


Executive Compensation

If a Named Executive Officer retires outside of the age and service thresholds stated in (iii) above, he or she will receive a (a) pro-rated LTIP Award payoutspayout for the calendar years2017-18-192020-21-22,2021-22-23 and2018-19-202022-23-24 performance periods, to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the number of full calendar quartersmonths served during each of the performance periods; and(b) pro-rated LTIP Award payout for the calendar year2019-20-21 performance period, to be determined at the end of the performance period, based on the number of full months served during the performance period.periods.

If the Named Executive Officer is less than 60 years of age on the date of retirement, then the Named Executive Officer must seek early retirement approval from the Human Resources and Compensation Committee to receive payments with respect to the following:

 

the Supplemental Retirement Program;

 

the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program; and

 

account balance in the unvested portion of the Named Executive Officer’s LTIP Award deferrals under our Executive Deferral Plan.

The Named executive Officers’ account balances under such nonqualified deferred compensation plans as of June 30, 2022 are set forth in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022 section of this Proxy Statement.

In addition, Named Executive Officers must be at least 55 years of age on the date of retirement to continue to receive premium payments under the Officer Life Insurance Plan which if needed will continue for the greater of ten years from commencement of plan participation or the number of years until they reach age 65. As of June 30, 2019,2022, Mr. Williams and Ms. Suever had reached 60 years of age with at least 10 years of service and Mr. Banks and Ms. Parmentier had reached 55 years of age with at least 10 years of service. Since Ms. Suever, Mr. Malone and Ms. Parmentier each became an executive officer after January 1, 2008, we will not make any post-retirement premium payments on their behalf.

In determining the amounts payable upon retirement reported in the following table, in the case of Messrs.Mr. Banks and Malone and Ms. Parmentier, we assumed that they did not receive(neither received) Human Resources and Compensation Committee approval for early retirement.

 

Officer

Pension
Plan

 

Pension
Restoration
Plan

 

Supplemental
Retirement
Program

 

LTIP
Awards

 

Post-
Retirement
Insurance
Premiums

 

Totals

 

 Pension Plan   Pension
Restoration Plan
 Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 LTIP Awards Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 Post-Retirement
Insurance Premiums
 Totals 

Thomas L. Williams

   621,388

5,225,679

22,658,045

11,905,460

40,531

40,451,103

  796,790    7,235,987   31,387,158   16,263,168      16,000   55,699,103 

Catherine A. Suever

1,304,219

2,856,363

  5,653,245

  2,868,579

12,682,406

Todd M. Leombruno

  554,130    1,757,265      1,671,500   325,934      4,308,829 

Lee C. Banks

   789,318

5,756,902

  4,041,506

28,254

10,615,980

  1,029,516    12,232,122      7,423,082      177,810   20,862,530 

Robert W. Malone

  1,074,407

  1,074,407

Jennifer A. Parmentier

     900,118

     900,118

            1,824,174   2,911,697   381,700   5,117,571 

Andrew M. Weeks(1)

            1,055,063   3,574,574      4,629,637 

(1)

As of his agreed retirement On August 31, 2022, Mr. Weeks’ balance under the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program was $3,826,680, and the value of his pro-rata payout of his LTIP Awards for the calendar years 2020-21-22,21-22-23 and 2022-23-24, based on actual performance for the full performance periods, assuming target performance and using the closing price of our common stock on August 31, 2022, was $1,136,320.

Payments upon Termination for Cause or Resignation

Upon the termination for cause or the resignation of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above, except that the Named Executive Officer will (i) forfeit his or her Supplemental Retirement Program benefit and his or her Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program benefit if the termination for cause is the result of competition by the Named Executive Officer against us, and (ii) forfeit his or her LTIP Awards if the termination or resignation occurs during the applicable performance period.

In determining the amounts payable upon termination for cause under the Supplemental Retirement Program and the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program, we assumed that the termination did not result from competition against us.

 

                                                                                                        

Officer

 

Pension
Plan

 

 

Pension
Restoration
Plan

 

 

Supplemental 
Retirement
Program

 

 

Totals

 

  Pension Plan   Pension
Restoration Plan
   Supplemental
Retirement Program
   Totals 

Thomas L. Williams

 

   621,388

 

5,225,679

 

22,658,045

 

28,505,112

   796,790    7,235,987    31,387,158    39,419,935 

Catherine A. Suever

 

1,304,219

 

2,856,363

 

  5,653,245

 

  9,813,827

Todd M. Leombruno

   554,130    1,757,265        2,311,395 

Lee C. Banks

 

   789,318

 

5,756,902

 

 

  6,546,220

   1,029,516    12,232,122        13,261,638 

Robert W. Malone

 

 

 

 

                0

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

 

 

 

                0

                

Andrew M. Weeks

                

2022 Proxy Statement73


Executive Compensation

Payments upon Termination without Cause

Upon the termination without cause of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer will receive the “Payments Generally Available” described above. In addition, if the Named Executive Officer signs a release of all claims against us, the Named Executive Officer will receive a lump sum payment equal to one week’s pay for each full year of service up to a maximum oftwenty-six weeks of pay and continuation of premium payments for medical and dental insurance based on the applicable COBRA rates for the Named Executive Officer for up to three months.

Additionally, he or she will be entitled to(a) pro-rated LTIP Award payouts for the calendar yearyears 2017-18-192020-21-22,2021-22-23 and2018-19-202022-23-24 performance periods, to be determined at the end of the respective performance periods, based on the number of full calendar quartersmonths served during each of the performance periods; and(b) pro-rated LTIP Award payout for the calendar year2019-20-21 performance period, to be determined at the end of the performance period, based on the number of full months served during the performance period.periods.

In determining the amounts payable upon termination without cause reported in the following tables, we assumed that the Named Executive Officer signed a release.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
      

Officer

 

Severance
Pay

 

 

Pension
Plan

 

 

Pension
Restoration
Plan

 

 

Supplemental 
Retirement
Program

 

 

Medical and
Dental
Benefits

 

 

Totals

 

 Severance
Pay
   Pension
Plan
 Pension
Restoration Plan
 Supplemental
Retirement Program
 LTIP
Awards
 Medical and
Dental Benefits
 Totals 

Thomas L. Williams

 

336,532

 

621,388

 

5,225,679

 

22,658,045

 

3,279

 

28,844,923

  457,688    796,790   7,235,987   31,387,158   8,112,473   3,816   47,993,912 

Catherine A. Suever

 

375,388

 

1,304,219

 

2,856,363

 

5,653,245

 

1,599

 

10,190,814

Todd M. Leombruno

  389,979    554,130   1,757,265      1,671,500   6,039   4,378,913 

Lee C. Banks

 

499,980

 

789,318

 

5,756,902

 

12,081,893

 

5,163

 

19,133,256

  562,484    1,029,516   12,232,122   11,187,951   3,717,734   6,039   28,735,846 

Robert W. Malone

 

  58,170

 

 

 

 

5,079

 

     63,249

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

123,750

 

 

 

 

5,124

 

   128,874

  220,758             1,824,174   6,033   2,050,965 

Andrew M. Weeks

  111,334             1,055,063   1,851   1,168,248 

Payments upon a Change in Control

A Change in Control occurs if and when:

 

subject to certain exceptions, any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) is or becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing 20% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board of Directors;

 

during any period of 24 consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such24-month period were our Directors, which we refer to as the Incumbent Board, cease to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors, unless the election, or nomination for election, of any person becoming a Director subsequent to the beginning of such24-month period was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Board;

our shareholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution; or

 

we enter into a merger, consolidation or other reorganization, or sell all of our assets, unless:

 

immediately following the business combination, (1) more than 50% of the total voting power eligible to elect Directors of the resulting entity is represented by shares that were common shares immediately prior to the business combination, (2) subject to certain exceptions, no person becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the voting power of the entity resulting from the business combination, and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board of Directors of the resulting entity were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the approval by the Board of Directors of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such business combination; or

 

the business combination is effected by means of the acquisition of common shares from us, and the Board of Directors approves a resolution providing expressly that such business combination does not constitute a Change in Control.

On July 21, 2008, we adopted certain amendments to our deferred compensation plans and arrangements to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The amendments included certain modifications to the above definition of “Change in Control” for purposes of those plans and arrangements which were necessary to comply with the definition required by Section 409A.

A Change in Control, either with or without a qualifying termination of a Named Executive Officer (as described below in “Payments upon a Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control”), has the following effects under the executive compensation plans:

 

any outstanding unvested Stock Incentive held by a Named Executive Officer vests and becomes exercisable immediately upon a Change in Control;

 

74LOGO


Executive Compensation

any outstanding LTIP Award will be paid in common shares equal to the greater of (i) the target LTIP Award or (ii) the LTIP Award that would be payable at the end of the performance period assuming a level of financial performance equivalent to that existing at the fiscal quarter end immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control;

 

upon a Change in Control, all amounts previously deferred by a Named Executive Officer under the Executive Deferral Plan, together with a “make whole” amount designed to compensate the executive for the lost opportunity to continue to defer receipt of such income (and the earnings thereon) pursuant to elections made under the Executive Deferral Plan, will be paid to the executive;

 

upon a Change in Control, under the Supplemental Retirement Program each Named Executive Officer will receive three additional years of age and service credit, alump-sum payment equal to the present value of the participant’s vested benefit under the Supplemental Retirement Program, and a“gross-up” payment to offset the effect, if any, of the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code on such lump sum payment; and

 

upon a Change in Control, any unvested account balance in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Retirement Program is automatically vested and such account shall be increased by three additional years ofnon-discretionary employer contributions based on the Named Executive Officer’s salary grade and target compensation at the time of the Change in Control. Such increase will not reflect deemed interest and earnings.

In determining the amounts payable upon a Change in Control reported in the following tables, the following assumptions or principles were used.

 

We used the same assumptions in “Payments Generally Available” described above.

We assumed that the Change in Control met the requirements of a Change in Control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted.

 

For Stock Incentives that vested on the triggering event, we valued the Stock Incentives at an amount per share equal to the difference between our closing stock price on June 30, 2019, $170.01,2022, $246.05, and the grant price per share for each of the Stock Incentives.

 

For lump sum present values for the Supplemental Retirement Program, we assumed a 1.00%0.0% discount rate for a Change in Control that meets the requirements under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and a 2.89%2.50% discount rate for a Change in Control that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A. In both instances, we used the applicable mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

To calculate the value of the LTIP Awards, we assumed a payout of 100% of the target LTIP Award and used our closing stock price on June 30, 2019, $170.01.2022, $246.05. Because the payout of the LTIP Awards is dependent upon the financial performance against the Peer Group equivalent to that existing at the fiscal quarter end immediately preceding the date of the Change in Control, a Named Executive Officer’s actual payout could range from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 200% of the Named Executive Officer’s target LTIP Award.

 

Officer Accelerated 
Vesting of
Stock
Incentives
Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units
Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program
Pension
Plan
Pension
Restoration
Plan(1)
Supplemental
Retirement
Program(1)
Executive
Deferral
Plan(1)
LTIP
Awards
Excise and
Related
Income  Tax
Gross-Up
Totals Accelerated
Vesting
of Stock
Incentives
 Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units
 Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 Pension
Plan(1)
 Pension
Restoration
Plan(1)
 Supplemental
Retirement
Program
 Executive
Deferral
Plan
 LTIP
Awards
 Excise and
Related
Income
Tax
Gross-Up
 Totals 

Thomas L. Williams

 

4,371,578

 

 

 

621,388

 

5,225,679

 

32,019,602

 

2,291

 

16,579,205

 

0

 

58,819,743

  4,441,742         796,790   7,235,987   38,711,626   959   16,263,168      67,450,272 

Catherine A. Suever

 

340,725

 

 

 

1,304,219

 

2,856,363

 

11,884,976

 

69,692

 

4,118,152

 

2,822,417

 

23,396,544

Todd M. Leombruno

  207,043      845,414   554,130   1,757,265      56,119   3,677,217   1,919,032   9,016,220 

Lee C. Banks

 

2,431,056

 

2,413,122

 

 

789,318

 

5,756,902

 

22,384,997

 

1,692,896

 

7,815,870

 

8,438,333

 

51,722,494

  2,034,635   3,695,671      1,029,516   12,232,122   18,205,689   1,202,689   7,423,082      45,823,404 

Robert W. Malone

 

271,382

 

 

3,682,413

 

 

 

 

 

2,074,462

 

1,770,348

 

7,798,605

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

388,907

 

 

2,045,779

 

 

 

 

 

1,827,437

 

1,066,964

 

5,329,087

  579,515   1,478,761   3,502,097               4,034,236      9,594,609 

Andrew M. Weeks

  579,515   396,141   4,032,791               2,123,165      7,131,612 

 

(1)

If the Change in Control does not meet the requirements of a Change in Control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, payment at the time of the Change in Control is “0”. There would also be a corresponding reduction in the excise and related income taxgross-up, and in each of the Named Executive Officers’ total payments.

Payments upon a Qualifying Termination in Connection with a Change in Control

Each of the Change in Control Agreements requires two triggering events to result in any severance payments to the Named Executive Officers:

 

Change in Control; and

 

termination of the employment of the Named Executive Officer in connection with a Change in Control.

2022 Proxy Statement75


Executive Compensation

Each Change in Control Agreement provides that, if the employment of the Named Executive Officer is terminated during the three years following a Change in Control, or prior to a Change in Control, where the termination was in anticipation of the Change in Control, either by us without “Cause” (as defined in the Change in Control Agreements) or by the Named Executive Officer for “Good Reason” (as described below), the Named Executive Officer shall be entitled to receive the “Payments upon a Change in Control” described above and the following:

 

pro rata base salary, unused vacation, and annual cash and long-term incentive compensation for the year of termination of employment;

 

severance pay equal to three times the Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary and annual cash incentive compensation, other than Converted RONA Bonuses;

 

continuation of welfare benefits (e.g., medical, life insurance, disability coverage) for a period of three years;

 

to the extent not previously received, all amounts previously deferred under ournon-qualified income deferral plans, together with a “make-whole” amount as described above, where the Named Executive Officer’s termination occurs within two years of a Change in Control that constitutes a “change in control” as defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; and

 

a“gross-up” payment to offset the effect, if any, of the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

“Good Reason” for termination of employment by the Named Executive Officer includes diminution in duties, reduction in compensation or benefits, relocation, or resignation from employment by the executive for any or no reason during the180-day period beginning on the 91st day after the Change in Control.

 

               

Officer

Severance
Pay

Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Incentives

Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units

Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program

Pension
Plan

Pension
Restoration
Plan

Supplemental
Retirement
Program(1)

Executive
Deferral
Plan

LTIP
Awards

Executive
Long-
Term
Disability
Premiums

Medical
and
Dental
Benefits

Officer
Life
Insurance
Premiums

Excise and
Related
Income Tax
Gross-Up

Totals

Thomas L. Williams

 

9,375,000

 

4,371,578

 

 

 

621,388

 

5,225,679

 

32,019,602

 

2,291

 

16,579,205

 

12,159

 

39,348

 

243,763

 

8,312,697

 

76,802,710

Catherine A. Suever

 

4,164,480

 

340,725

 

731,043

 

 

1,304,219

 

2,856,363

 

11,884,976

 

69,692

 

4,118,152

 

12,297

 

19,188

 

132,753

 

4,195,185

 

29,829,073

Lee C. Banks

 

6,000,000

 

2,431,056

 

4,966,672

 

 

789,318

 

5,756,902

 

22,384,997

 

1,692,896

 

7,815,870

 

8,476

 

61,956

 

160,225

 

10,403,732

 

62,472,100

Robert W. Malone

 

2,932,500

 

271,382

 

2,483,846

 

3,682,413

 

 

 

 

 

2,074,462

 

11,466

 

60,948

 

159,300

 

2,779,323

 

14,455,640

Jennifer A. Parmentier

 

2,895,900

 

388,907

 

1,021,760

 

2,045,779

 

 

 

 

 

1,827,437

 

9,817

 

61,488

 

105,105

 

2,045,013

 

10,401,206

Officer Severance
Pay
  Accelerated
Vesting
of Stock
Incentives
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Restricted
Stock Units
  Defined
Contribution
Supplemental
Retirement
Program
  Pension
Plan
  Pension
Restoration
Plan
  Supplemental
Retirement
Program(1)
  Executive
Deferral
Plan
  LTIP
Awards
  Executive
Long-Term
Disability
Premiums
  Medical
and
Dental
Benefits
  Officer
Life
Insurance
Premiums
  Excise and
Related
Income Tax
Gross-Up
  Totals 
Thomas L.
Williams
  14,193,169   4,441,742      0   796,790   7,235,987   38,711,626   959   16,263,168   7,632   45,792   24,000      81,720,865 
Todd M.
Leombruno
  4,316,673   207,043      845,414   554,130   1,757,265      56,119   3,677,217   12,078   72,468   133,971   4,498,776   16,131,154 
Lee C.
Banks
  8,581,962   2,034,635   3,695,671   0   1,029,516   12,232,122   18,205,689   1,202,689   7,423,082   12,078   72,468   88,905      54,578,817 
Jennifer A.
Parmentier
  4,852,197   579,515   1,478,761   3,502,097               4,034,236   12,066   72,396   114,507   5,609,990   20,255,765 
Andrew M.
Weeks
  4,026,189   579,515   396,141   4,032,791               2,123,165   3,702   22,212   97,376      11,281,091 

 

(1)

If the Change in Control does not meet the requirements of a Change in Control under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, payment at the time of the qualifying termination in connection with a Change in Control is as follows. Mr. Williams—$34,244,752; Mr. Leombruno—$0; Mr. Banks—$14,487,890; Ms. Parmentier—$0; and Mr. Weeks —$0. There would also be a corresponding reduction in the excise and related income taxgross-up in the total payments for each of the Named Executive Officers.

Departure of Andrew M. Weeks

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Mr. Weeks and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement on July 26, 2022 in connection with his agreed retirement on August 31, 2022. The Separation Agreement was intended to ensure an orderly transition of Mr. Weeks’ duties, govern the Company’s relationship with Mr. Weeks during the transition period and following his departure, and clarify and confirm the benefits Mr. Weeks was eligible to receive upon his departure. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Weeks agreed to a general release of claims against the Company, as well as customary confidentiality and non-disparagement terms, and received a cash payment of $1,064,846 and ownership of his Company-leased vehicle (valued at approximately $83,735). Mr. Weeks is also entitled to the retirement benefits explained in the table above titled “Payments upon Retirement.” In connection with his departure, Mr. Weeks forfeited all outstanding and unvested Stock Incentives and RSUs that he held as of his date of separation.

 

Officer

76  

Thomas L. Williams

24,311,379

Catherine A. Suever

8,854,615

Lee C. Banks

15,982,759

Robert W. Malone

0

Jennifer A. Parmentier

0

LOGO


Executive Compensation

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIOChief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Williams, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our median employee.team member.

Our pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employeeteam member and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’steam member’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. Therefore, the estimated pay ratio we report may not be comparable to the pay ratios reported by other companies and should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

As reported in the Summary Compensation Table, our Chief Executive Officer had annual total compensation for fiscal year 20192022 of $17,472,500.$18,448,169. Using this Summary Compensation Table methodology, the annual total compensation of our median employeeteam member for fiscal year 20192022 was $57,282.$56,416. As a result, we estimate that the ratio of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation to that of our median employeeteam member for fiscal year 20192022 was 305327 to 1.

For purposes of the fiscal year 20192022 Chief Executive Officer pay ratio set forth above, we useda new team member representing the same median employee identified with respect to our fiscal year 2018 Chief Executive Officer pay ratio, as theremedian-paid team member has been no changeselected as the median-paid team member identified in 2020 and utilized again in 2021 has left the Company. We identified the new “median team member” from our employee population on April 30, 2022, which included full-time, part-time, temporary, and seasonal team members who were employed on that date, whether in the U.S. or employeein foreign jurisdictions. As of April 30, 2022, we estimate there were 25,296 U.S. team members and 25,677 non-U.S. team members included in our team member population. We excluded independent contractors and leased employees from our calculation as any independent contractors or leased employees have compensation arrangementsdetermined by an unaffiliated third party. We further applied the de minimis exemption, which permits exempting non-U.S. team members that account for five percent or less of our total U.S. and non-U.S. team members. In total, 694 team members were excluded, including in the parenthetical numbers below in the following countries: Algeria (1), Argentina (33), Austria (20), Belarus (2), Chile (32), Denmark (36), Greece (1), Hong Kong (32), Hungary (1), Indonesia (44), Ireland (43), Israel (2), Kazakhstan (1), Lebanon (1), New Zealand (21), Norway (52), Peru (4), Portugal (3), Romania (2), Russian Federation (18), Singapore (113), Slovakia (1), Slovenia (3), South Africa (116), Taiwan (Province of China) (29), Turkey (42) and United Arab Emirates (41).

The consistently applied compensation measure we believe would significantly impactused was total cash compensation for fiscal year 2022. We annualized the pay ratio disclosure.earnings of all permanent employees who were on a leave of absence or were new-hires during the measurement period for fiscal year 2022. We did not make any other adjustments permissible by the SEC nor did we make any other material assumptions or estimates to identify our median employee.

2022 Proxy Statement77


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019ITEM 3 – RATIFICATION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for the selection, retention and recommendation of our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to appoint, compensate, retain, oversee, evaluate and, where appropriate, terminate, our independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee ensures the regular evaluation and rotation of the lead audit partner.

The Audit Committee recommends ratification of its appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. D&T served as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, and has served as our independent auditor since fiscal year 2008. A representative of D&T is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and available to respond to appropriate questions, and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.

    LOGO

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR“ THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE
APPOINTMENT OF D&T AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDING JUNE 30, 2023.

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

The following table sets forth compensation informationthe aggregate fees billed, or expected to be billed, for ournon-employee Directorsaudit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees (compliance and planning), and all other fees for services rendered by D&T for the fiscal year 2019.years ended June 30, 2022, and 2021:

 

     
Name(1)  

Fees       

Earned or       

Paid in Cash       

($)       

  

Stock
Awards

($)(2)

   

All Other       

  Compensation         

(3)($)       

  

Total

($)

 
     

Robert G. Bohn

   136,667           132,143   2,160          270,970 
     

Linda S. Harty

   162,000           132,143   3,160          297,303 
     

Kevin A. Lobo

   143,667           132,143   2,160          277,970 
     

Candy M. Obourn

   162,000           132,143   2,160          296,303 
     

Joseph Scaminace

   136,667           132,143   12,160          280,970 
     

Åke Svensson

   138,667           132,143   2,160          272,970 
     

Laura K. Thompson

   61,720           106,160   1,014          168,894 
     

James R. Verrier

   138,674           132,143   2,160          272,977 
     

James L. Wainscott

   192,000           132,143   12,160          336,303 
     

Robert J. Kohlhepp(4)

   43,333                 43,333 
     

Klaus-Peter Müller(4)

   43,333                 43,333 
     

Wolfgang R. Schmitt(4)

   43,333                 43,333 
   Twelve Months Ended June 30,
    2022  2021

Audit Fees. Fees for auditing our annual consolidated financial statements, reviewing our interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

   $9,873,000   $8,525,000

Audit-Related Fees. Fees for assurance and related services provided to us that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not included in “Audit Fees.” Fiscal year 2022 fees related primarily to the divestiture of the Aircraft Wheel and Brake Division (which are reimbursable by buyer) and 2021 fees related primarily to the acquisitions of LORD Corporation and Exotic Metals.

   $1,375,000   $675,000

Tax Fees—Compliance. Fees billed with respect to tax compliance services, such as global assistance in preparing various types of tax returns.

   $875,877   $782,278

Tax Fees—Planning. Fees billed for tax planning services.

   $485,825   $791,815

All Other Fees. Fiscal year 2022 fees billed were in connection with strategy consultation services related to the acquisition of Meggitt.

   $764,392   $

 

(1)

Thomas L. Williams, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and Lee C. Banks, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are not included in this table because they are Named Executive Officers and the compensation paid to them in fiscal year 2019 is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted under our 2016 Equity Plan in fiscal year 2019 and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amount was calculated using the closing stock price on the date of each of the grants. Except for Ms. Thompson, each of the

non-employee78 Directors received 902 RSUs on his or her grant date, and as of June 30, 2019, all such RSUs remained unvested. Ms. Thompson was elected to the Company’s Board on January 23, 2019, and received apro-rated amount of 677 RSUs on that date, and as of June 30, 2019, all such RSUs remained unvested.

LOGO
(3)

The amounts reported in this column include (a)


Item 3 - Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

In accordance with the SEC’s rules issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require, among other things, that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Audit Committee of all professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm. The policy specifically provides for the pre-approval of certain permissible services up to a budgeted amount to be determined annually by the Audit Committee. All other services require Audit Committee approval on a case-by-case basis. All of the services described in “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with our formal policy on auditor independence.

Under this policy, the Audit Committee can also pre-approve estimated fees for permissible non-audit services that may arise in the ordinary course of business. Before engaging our independent registered public accounting firm for such ordinary course services, (i) the services and fees are reviewed to ensure compliance with the policy by the independent registered public accounting firm, our Vice President and Controller, and the Company team members requesting the services and (ii) the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company confirm the services are permissible under the SEC and PCAOB independence rules. The Audit Committee is informed quarterly as to the status of pre-approved services actually provided by the independent auditor. This policy does not delegate the Audit Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve all services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Chair of the Audit Committee has been authorized by the Audit Committee to pre-approve services arising during the year that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee at the time of the annual audit services engagement, subject to predefined financial limits set by the Audit Committee. Services that are pre-approved by the Audit Committee Chair are then communicated to, and ratified by, the full Audit Committee at the Audit Committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.

Ratification of the appointment of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm for the value of the dividend equivalent units earned as additional RSUs on the unvested RSUs granted in fiscal year 2019 reported in footnote 2 to this table; and (b) the following matching gifts under our Matching Gifts Program: Ms. Harty—$1,000, Mr. Scaminace—$10,000 and Mr. Wainscott—$10,000.

(4)

Messrs. Kohlhepp, Müller and Schmitt retired as Directors on October 24, 2018.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who are also our employees do not receive any additional compensation for their services as Directors. During fiscal year 2019,non-employee Directors received an annual retainer, meeting fees (if applicable), and a restricted stock unit award. Ournon-employee Directors are also eligible to participate in our Matching Gifts Program as described inending June 30, 2023, requires the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. The following annual retainersaffirmative vote of thenon-employee Directors were effective during fiscal year 2019:

   
    

Approved

August 17, 2016

   Approved
August 15 and
September 7, 2018
 
  

Effective beginning

10/26/2016

   

Effective beginning

10/24/2018

 
   
Annual retainer for the Lead Director and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair:  $170,000   $200,000 
   

Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair:

  $150,000   $165,000 
   
Annual retainer for Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair:  $150,000   $165,000 
   

Annual retainer fornon-Chair Committee members:

  $130,000   $140,000 

In addition to holders of at least a majority of the annual retainers described above,non-employee Directors wereshares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to receive a $2,000 fee for attending each Boardvote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting of Directors orShareholders. The Audit Committee meeting that exceeds the number of regularly scheduled Board of Directors and relevant Committee meetings in a fiscal year by more than two. During fiscal year 2019, Messrs. Lobo, Svensson, Verrier and Wainscott and Mses. Harty and Obourn attended one extra Board meeting each, resulting in an additional payment of $2,000 to each of them.

During fiscal year 2019, Directors could elect to defer all or a portion of their annual retainers under our Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.

Each Director who was serving as a Director on October 24, 2018 and who was not a current employee was granted 902 RSUs under our 2016 Equity Plan. Ms. Thompson joined the Board of Directors on January 23, 2019believe that the continued retention of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, is in our best interest and received apro-rated awardthe best interest of 677 RSUs. The termsour shareholders.

Report of the RSUs provide that the RSUs will vest 100% on the later of (a) one year from the grant date; or (b) on the date of our next Annual Shareholders Meeting, also known as, in each case, the Vesting Date, except that if a Director ceases to be a Director for any reason prior to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders that occurs after the grant date, apro-ratedAudit Committee portion of her or his RSUs will vest on the Vesting Date and the remaining RSUs will be forfeited. All RSUs earn dividend equivalent units paid as additional RSUs, which are subject to the terms and conditions of the original RSU award and are payable directly to each Director to whom they are issued.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors consists of fiveseven Directors, each of whom is independent as defined in our Independence Standards for Directors and in compliance with the independence standards applicable to audit committee members in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and under the federal securities laws. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which is available on the Corporate Governance page of our investor relations website at www.phstock.com.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, with management and with Deloitte & Touche LLP, or D&T, our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.2022.

The Audit Committee has discussed with D&T the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and letter from D&T required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding D&T’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with D&T its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, filed with the SEC.

Audit Committee:

Linda S.A. Harty, Chair

Robert G. BohnJillian C. Evanko

William F. Lacey

Kevin A. Lobo

Åke Svensson

Laura K. Thompson

James R. Verrier

ITEM 2 – RATIFICATION OF THE

APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for the selection, retention and recommendation of our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to appoint, compensate, retain, oversee, evaluate and, where appropriate, terminate, our independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee ensures the regular evaluation and rotation of the lead D&T audit partner. The Audit Committee recommends ratification of its appointment of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. D&T served as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, and has served as our independent auditor since 2008. A representative of D&T is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and available to respond to appropriate questions, and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed, or expected to be billed, for audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees (compliance and planning), and all other fees for services rendered by D&T for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018:

  
   

Twelve Months Ended

June 30,

   
   2019  2018
   
Audit Fees.    Fees for auditing our annual consolidated financial statements, reviewing our interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q filed with the SEC and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. $8,193,000  $7,726,000
   
Audit-Related Fees.    Fees for assurance and related services provided to us that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not included in “Audit Fees.” Fiscal year 2019 fees related primarily to audit procedures, internal control reviews and reporting requirements resulting from US Tax reform, new leasing standards, new revenue recognition standards, and the potential acquisition of LORD Corporation. Fiscal year 2018 fees related primarily to audit procedures required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters and internal control review. $354,000  $1,249,000
   
Tax Fees—Compliance.    Fees billed with respect to tax compliance services, such as global assistance in preparing various types of tax returns. $944,000  $989,000
   
Tax Fees—Planning.    Fees billed for tax planning services. $305,000  $455,000
   
All Other Fees.    Fiscal year 2019 fees billed were in connection with integration consultation services related to the potential acquisition of LORD Corporation and services that are not otherwise included in the above categories are for services that are not otherwise included in the above categories (e.g., training sessions). Fiscal year 2018 fees billed are for services that are not otherwise included in the above categories (e.g., training sessions). $742,000  $2,000

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policies and Procedures.

In accordance with the SEC’s rules issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require, among other things, that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Audit Committee of all professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm. The policy specifically provides for the pre-approval of certain permissible services up to a budgeted amount to be determined annually by the Audit Committee. All other services require Audit Committee approval on a case-by-case basis. All of the services described in “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with our formal policy on auditor independence.

Under this policy, the Audit Committee can also pre-approve estimated fees for permissible non-audit services that may arise in the ordinary course of business. Before engaging our independent registered public accounting firm for such ordinary course services, (i) the services and fees are reviewed to ensure compliance with the policy by the independent registered public accounting firm, our Vice President and Controller, and the Company employees requesting the services and (ii) the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company confirm the services are permissible under the SEC and PCAOB independence rules. The Audit Committee is informed quarterly as to the status of pre-approved services actually provided by the independent auditor. This policy does not delegate the Audit Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve all services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Chair of the Audit Committee has been authorized by the Audit Committee to pre-approve services arising during the year that were not pre-approved by the Audit Committee at the time of the annual audit services engagement, subject to predefined financial limits set by the Audit Committee. Services that are pre-approved by the Audit Committee Chair are then communicated to, and ratified by, the full Audit Committee at the Audit Committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.

Ratification of the appointment of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of D&T as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, is in our best interest and the best interest of our shareholders.

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 2:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR

THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF D&T AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2020.

ITEM 3 – PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ON ANON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related SEC rules, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We encourage our shareholders to carefully read this Proxy Statement in its entirety before deciding whether or not to vote for or against this Item 3.

At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders voted in favor of annual frequency for thenon-binding, advisory approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. The nextnon-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers is expected to take place at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

As described in detail throughout our Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23 of this Proxy Statement, and as summarized in the “Executive Summary—Fiscal Year 2019” section of this Proxy Statement, our executive compensation program features, among other things, the following:

A“pay-for-performance” structure which ensures that a significant portion of the compensation for our executive officers is“at-risk,” is dependent on the short-term and long-term performance of our business and encourages and rewards performance that drives the key goals, operational priorities and metrics that we use to profitably grow our business and enhance shareholder value;

A structure which ensures that our executive compensation program aligns the interests of our executive officers and our shareholders, is not overly weighted towards annual cash incentive compensation and does not otherwise have the potential to threaten long-term shareholder value by promoting unnecessary or excessive risk-taking by our executive officers;

A structure consistent with our philosophy of targeting executive compensation at market median, which allows us to remain competitive with companies that compete with us for talented employees and shareholder investment;

Various executive compensation practices that contribute to good corporate governance, including a “claw-back” policy, stock ownership guidelines for Directors and executive officers, hedging, pledging and other stock ownership restrictions, and an annual compensation risk review; and

Effective oversight and decision-making by a highly-independent Board of Directors and a Human Resources and Compensation Committee consisting entirely of independent Directors that retains an independent executive compensation consultant.

The vote on this Item 3 isnon-binding and advisory in nature, which means that the vote is not binding on us, our Board of Directors or any of the Committees of our Board of Directors. However, our Board of Directors values the views of our shareholders and our Board of Directors and Human Resources and Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into account when addressing future compensation policies and decisions.

Our Board of Directors believes that our executive compensation program is reasonable and well-structured, satisfies its objectives and philosophies and is worthy of shareholder support. Accordingly, our Board of Directors requests that our shareholders vote to approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussions, is approved on anon-binding, advisory basis.

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PROPOSAL 3:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR

THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT ON ANON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS.

ITEM 4 – APPROVAL OF THE PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Subject to shareholder approval at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, on August 15, 2019, our Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, in order to (i) increase the number of shares of our common stock available thereunder by 7,800,000 shares, (ii) strike references to shares of our common stock subject to awards under the Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan being available for awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan or its predecessor; and (iii) change the fungible share ratio for full value awards from 3.69-to-1 to 4.07-to-1.

The 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was originally adopted effective as of October 26, 2016, the date that it was approved by our shareholders. The original share reserve under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was anticipated to fund awards for a three-year period. The 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was previously amended effective as of April 27, 2017 to apply a one-year minimum service requirement to stock options and stock appreciation rights. We are asking shareholders to approve an amendment and restatement of the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder by 7,800,000 to fund a new three-year period, for a total of 15,189,238 shares of Common Stock remaining available under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, and to make the other changes described above.

The description below of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is only a summary of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The changes reflected in Exhibit A show the proposed revisions to a composite of the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan as amended by the First Amendment thereto.

Why Should Shareholders Approve the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan Reflecting the Proposed Increase in the Number of Shares Authorized for Issuance Thereunder?

 

1.

The additional shares are needed to maintain an effective equity incentive compensation program.

An effective equity incentive compensation program is an important part of implementing The Win Strategy. Long-term equity incentive compensation advances both the financial performance and profitable growth goals of The Win Strategy, and allows us to attract, retain and reward the best possible candidates for positions of responsibility. We expect that the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will continue to be an important factor in attracting, retaining and rewarding the high caliber executives who are essential to our success, and in motivating these individuals to strive to enhance our growth and profitability.

We are requesting shareholder approval to increase the number of shares available under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan so that we will have sufficient shares available for approximately three years of equity awards. One of the important drivers of the need for additional shares under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is the success of our officers and key employees in outperforming our peers with respect to the key performance metrics established under our LTIP Awards. Our LTIP Awards, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, are currently structured to provide for payment in unrestricted shares at the end of a three-year performance period, with the final payout determined based upon our performance compared to our peers on three key long-term performance metrics (revenue growth, earnings per share growth, and average return on invested capital).

2022 Proxy Statement 2.

We carefully manage share usage under our equity incentive compensation program.

79

In administering our equity compensation program, we consider both our “burn rate” and our “overhang” in evaluating the impact of the program on our shareholders.

Our burn rate is defined as the number of equity awards granted in the year, divided by the undiluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. It measures the potential dilutive effect of annual equity grants. Our overhang is defined as the equity awards outstanding but not exercised, plus equity awards available to be granted (“available equity award shares”), divided by total common shares outstanding plus the available equity award shares. It measures the potential dilutive effect of outstanding equity awards and future awards available for grant. We believe that our burn rate and overhang are reasonable in relation to companies in our industry and reflect a judicious use of equity for compensation purposes. Moreover, we encourage our employees to hold their stock options and stock appreciation rights (or “SARs”) for extended periods of time after vesting. We believe that the success of our efforts to encourage employees to hold their stock options and SARs reflects the confidence of our employees in our prospects for future growth. However, as a result, stock options and SARs remain in the overhang calculation for relatively long periods.

As of August 23, 2019, a total of 7,389,238 shares of our common stock were available to be issued pursuant to awards under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. As of August 23, 2019, there were approximately 6,337,111 stock option and SAR awards in the aggregate that remained outstanding and unexercised, of which approximately 21% were held by our Named Executive Officers. The stock options and SARs had a weighted average exercise price of $126.49 and a weighted average remaining life of 5.51 years. As of August 23, 2019, there were 391,495 shares of our common stock subject to outstanding “full value” awards (awards other than stock options and SARs) under all of our plans.

  3.

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is designed to protect shareholder interests.

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan contains a number of features that are intended to protect the interests of our shareholders, including the following:

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan prohibits repricing or exchange of “underwater” stock options or SARs without shareholder approval.

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan does not include so-called “net share counting” provisions. Shares surrendered for the payment of the exercise price of stock options, repurchased by us with option proceeds, or withheld for taxes upon exercise or vesting of an award are not added back to the share reserve under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. Also, the full number of shares subject to stock-settled SARs and net-exercised stock options are counted against the share reserve under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan gives the Human Resources and Compensation Committee discretion to cause the forfeiture or recoupment of 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan awards in the event of detrimental activity by participants or pursuant to our claw-back policy.

Stock options and stock appreciation rights have a maximum term of ten years and cannot be granted at a discount to the grant date fair market value of our common stock.

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan prohibits the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance-based restricted share/unit awards.

Description of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

The principal features of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan are summarized below. The full text of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement, and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit A. The changes reflected in Exhibit A show the proposed revisions to a composite of the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan as amended by the First Amendment thereto.

Eligibility

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan provides for grants of stock options, SARs, restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards and restricted stock units to our employees and directors (except that incentive stock options (or “ISOs”) may be granted only to employees). Currently, nine non-employee directors and approximately 1,600 employees are eligible to participate in the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.

Plan Limits

If the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is approved by shareholders, the maximum number of shares of our common stock that will have been authorized for issuance pursuant to awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (including awards of ISOs) would be increased by 7,800,000 shares from 16,000,000 (originally approved by shareholders in 2016) to 23,800,000 shares. Common stock issued under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan may include authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or a combination of the foregoing. The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan currently provides that “full-value awards,” meaning all awards other than stock options, SARs and any restricted stock awards with a fair market value purchase price, will be counted against the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan maximum in a 4.07-to-1 ratio. For example, if we grant 100 restricted stock units, we would reduce the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan limit by 407 shares. Stock options and SARs will be counted against the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan limit in a 1-to-1 ratio.

Shares covering awards that terminate or are forfeited under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will again be available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, and upon payment in cash of the benefit provided by any award granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, any shares that were covered by that award will be available for issue under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. Shares surrendered for the payment of the exercise price of stock options, repurchased by us with option proceeds, or withheld for taxes upon exercise or vesting of an award, will not again be available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. In addition, when a SAR is exercised and settled in shares or a stock option is subject to net-exercise, all of the shares underlying the SAR or option will be counted against the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan limit regardless of the number of shares used to settle the SAR or option.

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan imposes sub-limits on the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan provides that no participant may be granted stock options or SARs for more than 1,000,000 shares in any three-year period. In addition, no participant may be granted restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards or restricted stock units for more than 1,000,000 shares in any three-year period. Also, no individual non-employee Director may be granted awards for more than 10,000 shares of common stock within a year. Further, to the extent that any restricted stock award, unrestricted stock award or restricted stock unit was intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, that award would be granted subject to the terms of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2015 Performance Bonus Plan (the “Performance Bonus Plan”), or a predecessor plan.

The Performance Bonus Plan was approved by our shareholders on October 28, 2015 and it specifies limits on the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to a performance-based award and sets out the business criteria on which performance goals may be based.

Administration

The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will be administered by our Human Resources and Compensation Committee, or such other committee as our Board of Directors selects consisting of two or more directors, each of whom is intended to be a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an “outside director” under regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and an “independent director” under the New York Stock Exchange rules. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has full and final authority in its discretion to take all actions it determines to be necessary in the administration of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.

Our Board of Directors may reserve to itself any or all of the authority and responsibility of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan or may act as administrator of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan for any and all purposes. In addition, our Board of Directors or the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may expressly delegate to a special committee, consisting of one or more directors or officers, some or all of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s authority, within specified parameters, to grant awards to eligible participants who, at the time of grant, are not officers and are not anticipated to be covered employees whose compensation would be subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Duration and Modification

To the extent required by applicable law, the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will terminate on October 26, 2026, or such earlier date as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may determine. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will remain in effect for outstanding awards until no awards remain outstanding, which period may extend beyond the plan termination date. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan at any time but shareholder approval is required for any amendment to the extent necessary to comply with the New York Stock Exchange rules or applicable laws. Currently, the New York Stock Exchange rules would require shareholder approval for a material revision of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, which would generally include a material increase in the number of shares available under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, a material extension of the term of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, an expansion of the class of participants eligible to participate in the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, an expansion of the types of awards provided under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, a material change in the method of determining the exercise price of stock options, and the deletion or limitation of the provision of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan prohibiting re-pricing of stock options and SARs.

Stock Options

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, grant stock options to participants in such number as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee determines in its discretion. Stock options may consist of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or both.

Stock options provide the right to purchase shares at a price not less than their fair market value on the date of grant (which date may not be earlier than the date that the Human Resources and Compensation Committee takes action with respect to such grants). The value of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on August 23, 2019 was $158.03 per share. No stock options may be exercised more than 10 years from the date of grant. No participant may be granted stock options for more than 1,000,000 shares in any three-year period.

Each grant will specify (i) any period of continuous employment that is necessary (or the performance objectives that must be achieved) before the stock options become exercisable, and (ii) the extent to which the option holder will have the right to exercise the stock options following termination. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee will determine the terms in its discretion, which terms need not be uniform among all option holders.

The option price is payable at the time of exercise in any of the following forms of consideration, to the extent permitted by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee: (i) in cash, (ii) by tendering unrestricted shares of our common stock that are already owned by the option holder and have a value at the time of exercise equal to the option price, (iii) by cashless exercise, (iv) by net-exercise, (v) with any other legal consideration that the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may deem appropriate, or (vi) by any combination of the foregoing methods of payment.

SARs

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, grant SARs to participants in such number as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee determines in its discretion.

The grant price for each SAR will be determined by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, in its discretion, and will be at least equal to the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. No SAR may be exercised more than 10 years from the date of grant. No participant may be granted SARs for more than 1,000,000 shares in any three-year period.

Upon the exercise of a SAR, the holder is entitled to receive payment in an amount determined by multiplying: (i) the excess of the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise over the grant price; by (ii) the number of shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. Each grant will specify whether the payment will be in cash, shares of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof.

Each grant of a SAR will specify (i) any period of continuous employment that is necessary (or the performance objectives that must be achieved) before the SAR becomes exercisable, and (ii) the extent to which the holder will have the right to exercise the SAR following termination. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee will determine these terms in its discretion, and these terms need not be uniform among all participants.

Restricted Share Awards

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, grant or sell shares of restricted stock to participants in such number as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee determines in its discretion.

A restricted share award constitutes an immediate transfer of ownership of a specified number of shares to the recipient in consideration of the performance of services. The transfer may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a payment by the recipient that is less than the fair market value per share on the date of grant. Unless otherwise provided by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, the participant is entitled immediately to voting, dividend and other ownership rights in the shares. However, any dividends with respect to restricted share awards that are earned based on the achievement of performance goals will be accumulated until the underlying restricted shares are, and such dividends will not be paid if the performance goals are not satisfied.

Restricted shares will be issued subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture based upon continued service, the achievement of performance goals, or the occurrence of other events as determined by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, in its discretion. In order to enforce these forfeiture provisions, the transferability of restricted shares will be prohibited or restricted during which such forfeiture provisions are to continue.

Unrestricted Stock Awards

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may issue shares of common stock to a participant, free of any restrictions, pursuant to a performance-based long-term incentive program having a performance period of not less than 12 months.

Restricted Stock Units

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, at any time and from time to time, grant or sell restricted stock units to participants in such number as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee determines in its discretion.

Restricted stock units constitute an agreement to deliver shares to the recipient in the future at the end of a restriction period and subject to the fulfillment of such conditions as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may specify. The transfer shall be made without additional consideration, except as otherwise provided by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee to comply with applicable law or to avoid undesirable tax consequences for participants.

During the restriction period the participant shall have no right to transfer any rights under his or her award and no right to vote or receive dividends on the shares covered by the restricted stock units, but the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may authorize the payment of dividend equivalents with respect to the restricted stock units, either in cash or by crediting the participant with additional restricted stock units as of the date of payment of cash dividends on our common stock. However, any dividend equivalents with respect to restricted stock units that are earned based on the achievement of performance goals will be accumulated until the underlying restricted stock units are earned, and such dividend equivalents will not be paid if the performance goals are not satisfied.

Acceleration of Awards

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, determine at any time that: (i) all or a portion of a participant’s stock options and SARs will become fully or partially exercisable; (ii) all or a part of the service-based vesting restrictions on all or a portion of the outstanding awards will lapse; (iii) any performance goals with respect to any awards will be deemed to be wholly or partially satisfied; and/or (iv) any other limitation or requirement under any such award will be waived, in each case, as of such date as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, in its discretion, declares. Any such decisions need not be uniform among all participants or awards. However, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee shall not take any action (i) that would cause an award that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exception from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to fail to qualify for that exception, or (ii) that would cause an award that is subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code to fail to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A.

Change in Control

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, provide for acceleration of the date on which awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan become exercisable, vested or settled in the event of a change in control of

Parker. In addition, in the event of a change in control, we may purchase outstanding awards at a price per share equal to the difference between the consideration per share payable pursuant to the change in control and any exercise or purchase price payable by a participant under the award. For purposes of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, a change in control generally means (i) the acquisition of at least 20% of our outstanding voting securities by an unrelated person; (ii) turnover of a majority of our Board of Directors within a 24-month period; (iii) a merger or similar transaction unless (A) our shareholders continue to own more than 50% of the surviving company in substantially the same proportions as before the transaction, (B) no unrelated person owns 20% or more of the surviving company, and (C) a majority of our incumbent directors continue to serve on the Board of Directors of the surviving corporation; or (iv) or our shareholders approve the complete liquidation or dissolution of the company.

Transferability

Except as our Board of Directors or the Human Resources and Compensation Committee otherwise determines, awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will not be transferable by a participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. However, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may permit the designation of beneficiaries to exercise a participant’s rights or to receive shares of common stock or other property under an award in the event of the participant’s death. Except as otherwise determined by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, stock options and SARs will be exercisable during a participant’s lifetime only by him or her or, in the event of the participant’s legal incapacity to do so, by his or her guardian or legal representative. Any award made under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan may provide that any shares issued or transferred as a result of the award will be subject to further restrictions upon transfer.

Forfeiture of Awards

If a participant engages in detrimental activity, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has the discretion to cancel any of the participant’s outstanding awards and to require the participant to (i) return all or a part of the common stock acquired under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan that the participant still owns, and (ii) with respect to common stock that the participant acquired under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan but no longer owns, repay in cash the difference between the amount paid for common stock and the fair market value of the stock on the date it was acquired. As defined in the plan, detrimental activity means any conduct or activity, whether or not related to our business or the business of any of our subsidiaries, that the Human Resources and Compensation Committee determines to be detrimental to our interests or the interests of any subsidiary.

Adjustments

In the event of any equity restructuring, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through a large, nonrecurring cash dividend, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will equitably adjust the number and kind of shares that may be delivered under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the individual award limits, and, with respect to outstanding awards, the number and kind of shares subject to outstanding awards, the exercise price, and the grant price or other price of shares subject to outstanding awards, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, such as a merger, consolidation or liquidation, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, cause there to be such equitable adjustment as described in the foregoing sentence, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights. However, unless otherwise determined by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, we will always round down to a whole number of shares subject to any award. Any such adjustment will be made by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, whose determination will be conclusive.

Prohibition on Re-Pricing

Subject to adjustment as described under “Adjustments” immediately above, the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan does not permit, without the approval of our shareholders, what is commonly known as the “re-pricing” of stock options or SARs, including:

an amendment to reduce the exercise price of any outstanding stock option or base price of any outstanding SAR;

the cancellation of an outstanding stock option or SAR and replacement with a stock option having a lower exercise price or with a SAR having a lower base price; and

the cancellation of an outstanding stock option or SAR and replacement with another award under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan or cash.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion is limited to a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the grant, exercise and vesting of awards under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. The tax consequences of awards may vary according to country of participation. Also, the tax consequences of the grant, exercise or vesting of awards may vary depending upon the particular circumstances, and it should be noted that income tax laws, regulations and interpretations change frequently. Participants should rely upon their own tax advisors for advice concerning the specific tax consequences applicable to them, including the applicability and effect of state, local and foreign tax laws.

Tax Consequences to Participants

Nonqualified Stock Options. In general, (i) a participant will not recognize income at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted; (ii) a participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the option price paid for the shares; and (iii) at the time of sale of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of the nonqualified option, appreciation (or depreciation) in value of the shares after the date of exercise will be treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize income at the time an ISO is granted or exercised. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the option price paid may constitute a preference item for the alternative minimum tax purposes. If shares are issued to the optionee pursuant to the exercise of an ISO, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such optionee within two years after the date of the grant or within one year after the issuance of such shares to the optionee, then upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the option price will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss. If shares acquired upon the exercise of an ISO are disposed of prior to the expiration of either holding period described above, the optionee generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of such shares as of the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares if a sale or exchange) over the option price paid for such shares. Any further gain (or loss) realized by the participant generally will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on the holding period.

SARs. A participant will not recognize income upon the grant of a SAR. The participant generally will recognize ordinary income when the SAR is exercised in an amount equal to the cash and the fair market value of any unrestricted shares received on the exercise.

Restricted Stock Awards. A participant will not be subject to tax until the shares of restricted stock are no longer subject to forfeiture or restrictions on transfer for purposes of Section 83 of the Internal

Revenue Code. At that time, the participant will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of the restricted shares (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such restricted shares). However, a participant who so elects under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code within 30 days of the date of transfer of the shares will have taxable ordinary income on the date of transfer of the shares equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares (determined without regard to the restrictions) over the purchase price, if any, of such restricted shares. Any appreciation (or depreciation) realized upon a later disposition of such shares will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain depending upon how long the shares have been held. If a Section 83(b) election has not been made, any dividends received with respect to restricted shares that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions generally will be treated as compensation that is taxable as ordinary income to the participant.

Unrestricted Stock Awards. A participant will recognize ordinary income upon the grant of an unrestricted stock award equal to the fair market value of the unrestricted shares received by the participant.

Restricted Stock Units. A participant will not recognize income upon the grant of restricted stock units. Upon payment of the awards, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the cash and the fair market value of any unrestricted shares received.

Dividend Equivalents. Any dividend equivalents awarded with respect to awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and paid in cash or unrestricted shares will be taxed to the participant at ordinary income rates when such cash or unrestricted shares are received by the participant.

Section 409A. The Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan permits the grant of various types of awards that may or may not be exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. If an award is subject to Section 409A, and if the requirements of Section 409A are not met, the award could be subject to tax at an earlier time than described above and could be subject to additional taxes and penalties. Stock options and stock appreciation rights that comply with the terms of the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan are designed to be exempt from the application of Section 409A. Restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards, restricted stock units and dividend equivalents granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan will be designed either to be exempt from, or to comply with the requirements of, Section 409A.

Tax Consequences to Us

To the extent that a participant recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction provided that, among other things, the income (i) meets the test of reasonableness, is an ordinary and necessary business expense, and is not an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code; and (ii) is not disallowed by the $1.0 million limitation on executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

New Plan Benefits

Because grants under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan are discretionary, the benefits or amounts that may be received by or allocated to each participant are generally not known. However, as part of our compensation program for Directors, on August 15, 2019, each of our nine non-employee Directors was awarded a grant, effective October 23, 2019, of RSUs with a value of approximately $150,000 (based on the closing price of the shares of common stock on August 13, 2019). The following table sets forth the aggregate RSUs awarded to the non-employee Director group:

   
Name and Position  Dollar Value($)            Number of Shares of
Common Stock
 

Non-Employee Director Group

  

$1,350,000          

  

 

8,154

 

Required Vote for Approval

Approval of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the votes present or represented and entitled to vote on the proposal at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, provided that a majority of the outstanding shares is voted with respect to the proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THE PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AND RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL OF THE PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.

Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2019, unless otherwise indicated.

    
Plan Category

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of outstanding
options, warrants

and rights

Weighted-average

exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for

future issuance under
Equity compensation

plans

 

Equity compensation plans

    approved by security holders

 

7,347,772(1)

 

$121.51

 

18,673,701(2)

 

Equity compensation plans not

    approved by security holders

 

 

      —

 

Total

7,347,772$121.5118,673,701

(1)

Includes the maximum future payouts of common stock that may be issued under the calendar year 2017-18-19, 2018-19-20 and 2019-20-21 long term incentive performance awards (“LTIP awards”). For these LTIP awards, payouts will be determined based on our achieving an average return on average equity of 4% or an average free cash flow margin of 4%. If these performance measures are achieved, the participants will be eligible to receive the maximum payout of 200%. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee will then compare our performance to that of a group of our peers and, if appropriate, apply its discretion to reduce the final payouts based on any performance measures that the Committee determines to be appropriate.

(2)

The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is 16 million shares, of which approximately 8.7 million shares are available for future issuance. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan is 10 million shares, of which approximately 9.9 million shares are still available for future issuance.


The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of August 23, 2019, unless otherwise indicated.

    
Plan Category

Number of securities

to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants

and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for

future issuance under

Equity compensation

plans

 

Equity compensation plans

    approved by security holders

 

7,928,328(1)

 

128.32

 

17,354,540(2)

 

Equity compensation plans not

    approved by security holders

 

 

      —

 

Total

7,928,328128.3217,354,540

(1)

Includes 6,337,111 stock option and SAR awards outstanding and unexercised, with a weighted average exercise price of $126.49 and a weighted average remaining life of 5.51 years. Also included are 391,495 shares of common stock subject to outstanding “full value” awards.

Also includes the maximum future payouts of common stock that may be issued under the calendar year 2017-18-19, 2018-19-20 and 2019-20-21 long term incentive performance awards (“LTIP awards”). For these LTIP awards, payouts will be determined based on our achieving an average return on average equity of 4% or an average free cash flow margin of 4%. If these performance measures are achieved, the participants will be eligible to receive the maximum payout of 200%, which would be 1,199,722 shares at 200% payout levels. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee will then compare our performance to that of a group of our peers and, if appropriate, apply its discretion to reduce the final payouts based on any performance measures that the Committee determines to be appropriate.

(2)

The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is 16 million shares, of which approximately 7.4 million shares are available for future issuance. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan is 10 million shares, of which approximately 9.9 million shares are still available for future issuance.

ITEM 5 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A POLICY THAT REQUIRES

THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

TO BE AN INDEPENDENT MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

This proposal has been submitted on behalf of Martin Harangozo (the “Proponent” or “Mr. Harangozo”). Mr. Harangozo is one of our shareholders. We will provide to shareholders, promptly upon receiving an oral or written request, the number of shares of our common stock held by Mr. Harangozo as of our record date, August 30, 2019. In accordance with the applicable proxy rules, the proposed resolution and supporting statement, for which our Board of Directors accepts no responsibility, are set forth below.

Proponent’s Proposal

Shareholders request our Board of Directors to adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require henceforth that the Chair of the Board of Directors, whenever possible, to be an independent member of the Board. The Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next Chief Executive Officer transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement. If the Board determines that a Chairman, who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chairman who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chairman. This proposal requests that all the necessary steps be taken to accomplish the above. Caterpillar is an example of a company changing course and naming an independent board chairman. Caterpillar had opposed a shareholder proposal for an independent board chairman at its annual meeting. Wells Fargo also changed course and named an independent board chairman. This proposal topic won impressive 41%-support at the 2018 General Electric annual meeting even though management spent extra shareholder money to try to put a lid on the shareholder votes in favor. The 2018 proposal likely won more than 50%-support from the shareholders who have ready access to independent advice on the importance of this proposal topic in contrast to many shareholders who unfortunately have access to onlyone-sided management advice. An independent Chairman is best positioned to build up the oversight capabilities of the many new directors on our Board while the CEO addresses the challengingday-to-day issues facing the company. Please vote yes.

Matthew Johnson 230 Beechtree Ln Mount Washington KY 40047, the General Electric Appliance parts sourcing boss for 2010 stated “how do you know the supplier is not blowing smoke”. Matthew Johnson is asking how do you know Parker Hannifin is not lying? Matthew Johnson is suggesting a scenario where Parker Hannifin simply invoices five times the buyers purchase order to increase profits for Parker Hannifin and decrease profits for General Electric. Matthew Johnson uses apparent bad accountinghttps://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8/2013/martinharangozorecon030413-14a8.pdf. While Parker Hannifin is prospering and has grown since 2000 as did the overall stock market, General Electric has had the stock price decline as General Electric earnings shifted from twenty billion in profit to twenty billion in losses. (see image for a visual impression).

Parker Hannifin and General Electric annual reports:

Parker Hannifin outperforms the stock market in the

last five years

 

 

LOGO

General Electric underperformed the stock market in

the last five years

LOGO

Board of Directors Response

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you voteAGAINST this proposal because it unnecessarily limits the ability of the Board to determine the appropriate leadership structure of the Company, which is not in our best interests or in the best interests of our shareholders.

Our Board of Directors strongly favors a governance structure that includes a diligent and independent Board of Directors. The independent directors of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee conduct annual assessments of the Company’s corporate governance structures and processes and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regularly considers and is open to different Board leadership structures, as circumstances may warrant. At present, our Board of Directors continues to believe that the current arrangement, a combined

Chairman and Chief Executive officer who works in conjunction with an independent Lead Director, is the appropriate leadership structure for our organization. Our Board of Directors holds this view because it believes our corporate governance structure enables strong leadership, creates clear accountability, and enhances the Company’s ability to communicate its strategy and message to shareholders, customers, suppliers, employees, and other constituencies.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of our Board of Directors, an independent director, serves as our “Lead Director.” Our Lead Director is the chairman of ournon-management, independent Directors, who meet regularly in executive session without management. Ournon-management, independent Directors met four times during fiscal year 2019. Our Lead Director presides over and supervises the conduct of all meetings of ournon-management, independent Directors, as well as meetings of our Board of Directors at which our Chairman of the Board is not present. Our Lead Director also facilitates communication between our independent Directors, Chairman of the Board and our management, prepares and approves agendas for meetings of our Board of Directors, identifies and recruits potential candidates for election to our Board of Directors, and composes and structures the leadership of the Committees of our Board of Directors.

The independent structure of our Board of Directors is also clearly evidenced by the composition of our current Board of Directors and its Committees. Our Board of Directors currently has eleven Directors, nine of whom are independent based on our Board of Directors’ consideration of our Independence Standards for Directors and the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Audit Committee are composed entirely of independent directors. Consequently, independent directors directly oversee critical matters such as our executive compensation program, our corporate governance guidelines, policies and practices, our corporate finance strategies and initiatives, and the integrity of our financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting.

Despite the Proponent’s preference for an independent Chairman, there is currently no consensus in the United States that separating the role of Chairman from senior executives is a corporate governance “best practice” or that such a separation enhances shareholder value. According to the 2018 Spencer Stuart U.S. Board Index, in 2018, 69.5% of S&P 500 companies did not have an independent Chairman. Board structures vary greatly among U.S. public companies based on the particular facts and circumstances of each company, and no“one-size-fits-all” board structure has been shown to enhance or guarantee corporate success.

This shareholder proposal would severely limit the ability of our Board of Directors to consider whether a member of management is best positioned to serve in the role of Chairman at any given time. Rigid application of the proposal would deprive our Board of Directors of the flexibility to evaluate our particular needs, the specific qualifications of the individuals in question, and the particular facts and circumstances affecting our business as it considers candidates for Chairman. We believe that shareholders are best served by a Board of Directors that can adapt and respond to our needs and capitalize on the capabilities of its Directors and senior executives. Because this proposal narrows the options available to our Board of Directors with respect to our leadership structure, we do not believe its adoption is in our best interests or in the best interests of our shareholders.

We believe the current leadership structure combining the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has served the Company and our shareholders well. Having served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since January 2016, Mr. Williams is an experienced leader with extensive knowledge of the industries we serve. Mr. William’s specific experience and expertise allows him to identifyday-to-day issues and opportunities, focus the independent directors’ attention on the matters of greatest importance to the Company and its stockholders, and ensure alignment between the

Company’s long-term strategic goals and its operational execution. The Board of Directors believes that the Company and its shareholders are best served by Mr. Williams in the roles of both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and that this consolidated leadership is effectively balanced by our independent Lead Director and our otherwise predominantly independent Board.

FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING REASONS, OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEAGAINST THIS PROPOSAL.BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

This is anon-binding shareholder proposal and requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock voted on this Item. Accordingly, because abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes “for” or “against” this Item, they will have no effect on this Item. The results of the shareholder vote on this Item notwithstanding, the ultimate adoption of any measures called for by this shareholder proposal is at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

OF COMMON STOCK

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERSPrincipal Shareholders

The following table sets forth, as of July 31, 2019,2022, except as otherwise indicated, the name and address of each person believed to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares and the number of common shares and the percentage so owned, as well as the beneficial ownership of our common shares by our Directors, the Named Executive Officers and all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(a)
   Percentage
of Class(b)
 

Name of

Beneficial Owner

             Amount              

             and              

             Nature of             

             Beneficial              

             Ownership(a)              

             Percentage                   

of         

Class(b)         

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

   

9,575,524(c)

9,658,608(c)
    

7.23%         

7.52%

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   

8,457,062(d)

8,835,243(d)
    

6.40%         

6.90%

Jillian C. Evanko

Capital World Investors

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

1,108      

8,286,971(e)Lance M. Fritz

   

6.20%         

Robert G. Bohn

5,022
      

     10,212    Linda A. Harty

5,161     

Linda S. HartyWilliam F. Lacey

923      

     9,741  

Kevin A. Lobo

   9,648 

       6,513    

     

Candy M. Obourn

     9,342  

Joseph Scaminace

   

     16,382(f)

10,043(e)
     

Åke Svensson

   

       7,503    

7,591
     

Laura K. Thompson

   

         0    

2,908
     

James R. Verrier

   

       2,744    

5,879
     

James L. Wainscott

   

     12,092    

20,280
     

Thomas L. Williams

   669,408(f) 

   488,660(g)

     

Catherine A. SueverTodd M. Leombruno

35,215(g)      

     80,542(h)

Lee C. Banks

   407,554(h) 

   345,020(i) 

     

Robert W. Malone

     46,649(j) 

Jennifer A. Parmentier

   

     41,113(k)

66,085(i)
     

Andrew M. Weeks

31,701(j)

All Directors and executive officers as a group (24(26 persons)

   

1,587,778(l) 

1,776,169(k)
    

1.23%         

1.37%

 

(a)

Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power.

(b)

No Director or executive officer beneficially owned more than 1% of our common shares as of July 31, 2019.2022.

(c)

Pursuant to a statement filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 11, 2019,10, 2022, in accordance with Rule13d-1(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, The Vanguard Group has reported that, as of December 31, 2018,2021, it had sole voting power over 162,016 common shares; shared voting power over 30,727201,423 common shares; sole investmentdispositive power over 9,392,8289,150,495 common shares; and shared investmentdispositive power over 182,696508,113 common shares.

(d)

Pursuant to a statement filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 6, 2019,1, 2022, in accordance with Rule13d-1(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, BlackRock, Inc. has reported that, as of December 31, 2018,2021, it had sole voting power over 7,238,9197,642,502 common shares and sole investmentdispositive power over 8,457,0628,835,243 common shares.

(e)

Pursuant to a statement filed by Capital World Investors with the SEC on February 14, 2019, in accordance with Rule13d-1(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Capital World Investors has reported that as of December 31, 2018, it had sole voting power and sole investment power over 8,286,971 common shares.

(f)

This amount includes 2,6823,264 common shares indirectly owned by Mr. Scaminace through the Joseph Scaminace Foundation.

(g)(f)

This amount includes 3,9754,320 common shares as to which Mr. Williams holds voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2019,2022, and 322,400436,061 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable by Mr. Williams on or prior to September 29, 2019,30, 2022, granted under our stock incentive plans.

(h)(g)

This amount includes 2,3563,558 common shares as to which Ms. SueverMr. Leombruno holds voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2019, 57,8402022, and 21,200 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable by Ms. SueverMr. Leombruno on or prior to September 29, 2019,30, 2022, granted under our stock incentive plans, and 3 common shares subject to the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan.plans.

(i)(h)

This amount includes 13,909 common shares owned indirectly by Mr. Banks through the Elizabeth K. Banks Revocable Trust, 1,846549 common shares owned indirectly by Mr. Banks through his three children, 12,176the Lee and Elizabeth Banks Family Foundation, 12,887 common shares as to which Mr. Banks holds voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2019,2022, and 234,697262,771 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable by Mr. Banks on or prior to September 29, 2019,30, 2022, granted under our stock incentive plans.

 (j)
80LOGO


Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

(i)

This amount includes 679 common shares as to which Mr. Malone holds voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2019, and 36,320 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable by Mr. Malone on or prior to September 29, 2019 granted under our stock incentive plans.

(k)

This amount includes 1,0051,208 common shares as to which Ms. Parmentier holds voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2019,2022, and 30,59443,620 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable by Ms. Parmentier on or prior to September 29, 2019,30, 2022, granted under our stock incentive plans.

(l)(j)

This amount includes 497,445269 common shares as to which Mr. Weeks holds voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2022, and 26,020 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable by Mr. Weeks on or prior to September 30, 2022, granted under our stock incentive plans.

(k)

This amount includes 643,067 common shares for which voting and investment power are shared, 51,69249,239 common shares as to which all executive officers as a group hold voting power pursuant to the Retirement Savings Plan as of July 31, 2019,2022, and 1,017,3951,083,863 common shares subject to Stock Incentives exercisable on or prior to September 29, 2019,30, 2022, granted under our stock incentive plans held by all executive officers as a group.

SHAREHOLDERS’ PROPOSALSDelinquent Section 16(a) Reports

We must receive at our principal executive offices by May 26, 2020 any proposalSection 16(a) of a shareholder intended to be presented at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and to be included in our proxy, notice of meeting and proxy statement related to the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such proposals should be submitted to us by certified mail, return receipt requested. Proposals of shareholders submitted outside the processes of Rule14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 orNon-Rule14a-8 Proposals,requires our executive officers, Directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our Common Shares to file initial stock ownership reports and reports of changes in connectionownership with the 2020SEC. Based solely on a review of these reports, as filed electronically with the SEC during fiscal year 2022, and upon written representations from our executive officers and Directors, we believe that all Directors, Officers and 10% or greater beneficial owners complied with all such filing requirements for fiscal year 2022, except that due to an administrative error a late Form 4 was filed on April 7, 2022 for Mr. Banks with respect to one transaction occurring within the fiscal year period.

2022 Proxy Statement81


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

You may attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be receivedif you were a shareholder as of the close of business on September 2, 2022. If you are a registered shareholder or a participant in a retirement or savings plan maintained by us and plan to attend in accordance with our advance notice procedures, which require that shareholders that desireperson, please indicate your intention to submitNon-Rule14a-8 proposals submitattend by marking the applicable noticeappropriate box on the Proxy Card and returning same prior to us no earlier than August 24, 2020 andthe meeting, but no later than September 23, 2020. OurOctober 17, 2022. If you attend the Annual Meeting in person, please bring the Admission Card (torn from the top half of your proxy relatedcard), along with a proper form of photo identification. To ensure a smooth security check-in, and to allow the 2020meeting to begin promptly at 9:00 a.m., please arrive no later than 8:45 a.m.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, will give discretionary authority to theyou must bring proof of ownership, such as an account statement, that clearly shows that you held our common stock as of September 2, 2022, or a legal proxy holders to vote with respect to allNon-Rule14a-8 Proposals receivedobtained from your bank, broker or other nominee. Alternatively, you may obtain an Admission Card by us after August 9, 2020. Our proxy related to the 2019 Annual Meetingsending your request and a copy of Shareholders gives discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote with respect to allNon-Rule14a-8 Proposals received by us after August 10, 2019.

Shareholders who wish to submit Director nominees for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meetingyour proof of Shareholders must meet the ownership and other requirements for proxy access set forth in our Amended and Restated Regulations. For the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such nominations must be received by us no earlier than April 26, 2020 and no later than May 27, 2020.

SHAREHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider shareholder recommendations for nominees for election to our Board of Directors if such recommendations are in writing and set forth the information listed below. Such recommendations must be submitted to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141,44124, Attention: Secretary,Secretary. You must also bring a photo ID.

For security purposes, no cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, backpacks, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the meeting room or adjacent areas, and mustother items will be received at our executive offices on or before June 30 of each year in anticipation of the following Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All shareholder recommendations for Director nominees must set forth the following information:subject to search.

How do I vote?

    LOGO   

VOTE VIA

INTERNET www.proxyvote.com

LOGO   

VOTE BY

PHONE

800-690-6903

LOGO   

VOTE BY MAIL

Vote Processing

c/o Broadridge 51 Mercedes

Way, Edgewood, NY 11717

  LOGO   

VOTE AT THE MEETING

Parker-Hannifin Corporation    

6035 Parkland Boulevard

Cleveland Ohio, 44124

 

1.

The name and address of the shareholder recommending the candidate for consideration as such information appears on our records, the telephone number where such shareholder can be reached during normal business hours, the number of common shares owned by such shareholder and the length of time such shares have been owned by the shareholder; if such person is not a shareholder of record or if such shares are owned by an entity, reasonable evidence of such person’s beneficial ownership of such shares or such person’s authority to act on behalf of such entity;

 2.

Complete information as to the identity and qualifications of the proposed nominee, including the full legal name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers and other contact information, and the principal occupation and employment of the candidate recommended for consideration, including his or her occupation for at least the past five years, with a reasonably detailed description of the background, education, professional affiliations and business and other relevant experience (including Directorships, employment and civic activities) and qualifications of the candidate;

82  3.

The reasons why, in the opinion of the recommending shareholder, the proposed nominee is qualified and suited to be a Director;

LOGO


    

4.

The disclosure of any relationship of the candidate being recommended with us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates, whether direct or indirect;

 

5.

A description of all relationships, arrangements and understandings between the proposing shareholder and the candidate and any other person(s) (naming such person(s)) pursuant to which the candidate is being proposed or would serve as a Director, if elected; and

 

6.

A written acknowledgement by the candidate being recommended that he or she has consented to being considered as a candidate, has consented to our undertaking of an investigation into that individual’s background, education, experience and other qualifications in the event that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee desires to do so, has consented to be named in our Proxy Statement and has consented to serve as a Director, if elected.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORSOTHER MATTERS

Our shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with our Board of Directors as a group, with thenon-management Directors as a group, or with any individual Director by sending written communications to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary. Complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be forwarded directly to the Chair of the Audit Committee. All other communications will be provided to the individual Director(s) or group of Directors to whom they are addressed. Copies of all communications will be provided to all other Directors; provided, however, that any such communications that are considered to be improper for submission to the intended recipients will not be provided to the Directors. Examples of communications that would be considered improper for submission include customer complaints, solicitations, communications that do not relate, directly or indirectly, to our business and/or our subsidiaries, or communications that relate to improper or irrelevant topics.

GENERALGeneral

Our Board of Directors knows of no other matters which will be presented at the meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournment, the person or persons voting the proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

We will bear the expense of preparing, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement. In addition to solicitation by mail, our officers and employeesother team members may solicit the return of proxies. We will request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxy material to beneficial owners of common shares. We will, upon request, reimburse them for their expenses in so doing. We have retained Okapi Partners LLC, 1212 Avenue of the Americas, 24th Floor, New York, New York 10036, to assist in the solicitation of proxies at an anticipated cost of $19,000,$36,000 plus disbursements.

You are urged to vote your proxy promptly by internet, telephone or mail by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card in order to make certain your shares will be voted at the meeting. Common shares represented by properly voted proxies will be voted in accordance with any specification made thereon and, if no specification is made, will be voted:

 

in favor of the election of Lee C. Banks, Robert G. Bohn,Jillian C. Evanko, Lance M. Fritz, Linda S.A. Harty, William F. Lacey, Kevin A. Lobo, Candy M. Obourn, Joseph Scaminace, Åke Svensson, Laura K. Thompson, James R. Verrier, James L. Wainscott and Thomas L. Williams as Directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2020;2023;

in favor of approving, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; and

 

in favor of the ratification of the appointment of D&T as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020;2023.

 

in favor of approving, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;

in favor of approving the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan; and

against the shareholder proposal described beginning on page 90.

2022 Proxy Statement83


Other Matters

The proposals contained herein are subject to the following approval thresholds:

 

 

Item 1 – Election of Directors

The nominees for Director receiving the greatest number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in personvirtually or by proxy will be elected; provided that such nominee receives more votes “for” than “against” his or her election. Accordingly, because abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes “for” or “against” a Director nominee, they will have no impact on this Item.

  Item 2 – Proposal to Approve the Compensation of our Named

  Executive Officers on a Non-Binding, Advisory Basis

This vote is advisory only and therefore is not binding on us or our Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into account when addressing the future compensation policies and decisions.

Item 23 – Ratification of the
Appointment of Independent

Registered Public Accounting Firm

Although our independent registered public accounting firm may be selected by the Audit Committee without shareholder approval, the Audit Committee will consider the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented and entitled to vote on this Item to be a ratification by the shareholders of D&T as our independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote cast against this proposal.

Item 3 – Proposal to Approve the Compensation of our Named
Executive Officers on aNon-Binding, Advisory Basis

This vote is advisory only and therefore is not binding on us or our Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into account when addressing the future compensation policies and decisions.

Item 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

This Item 4 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock voted on this Item. Accordingly, abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes “for” or “against” this Item, they will have no effect on this Item.

Item 5 – Shareholder Proposal to Adopt a Policy that Requires the Chairman of the Board to be Independent

This is anon-binding shareholder proposal and requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock voted on this Item. Accordingly, because abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes “for” or “against” this Item, they will have no effect on this Item. The results of the shareholder vote on this Item notwithstanding, the ultimate adoption of any measures called for by this shareholder proposal is at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the close of voting at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders by giving us notice in writing, in openduring the virtual meeting, or by internet or telephone as set forth on the proxy card, without affecting any vote previously taken. However, your mere presenceattendance at the meeting will not operate to revoke your proxy.

Our Annual Report, including financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, is being mailed to shareholders with this Proxy Statement. If a single copy of the Annual Report and Proxy Statement was delivered to an address that you share with another shareholder, you may request a separate copy by notifying us in writing at Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling(216) 896-3000.

You can elect to view our future Annual Reports and Proxy Statements over the internet, instead of receiving paper copies in the mail. Providing these documents over the internet will save us the cost of producing and mailing them. If you give your consent, in the future, when, and if, we elect to provide these documents, over the internet, you will receive notification which will contain the internet location where the documents are available. There is no cost to you for this service other than any charges you may incur from your internet provider, telephone and/or cable company. To give your consent, follow the prompts when you vote by telephone or over the internet or check the appropriate box located at the bottom of the enclosed proxy card when you vote by mail. Once you give your consent, it will remain in effect until you inform us otherwise in writing. If at any time you would like to receive a paper copy of our Annual Report or Proxy Statement, please contact Corporate Communications at the address or telephone number provided above.

HOW TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

You may attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders if you were a shareholder as of the close of business on August 30, 2019. If you are a registered shareholder or a participantus in a retirement or savings plan maintained by us and plan on attending in person, please indicate your intention to attend by marking the appropriate box on the Proxy Card and returning same prior to the Meeting, but no later than October 21, 2019. If you attend the Annual Meeting in person, please bring the Admission Card (torn from the top half of your proxy card), along with a proper form of photo identification. To ensure a smooth securitycheck-in, and to allow the Meeting to begin promptly at 9:00 a.m., please arrive no later than 8:50 a.m.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you must bring proof of ownership, such as an account statement, that clearly shows that you held our common stock as of August 30, 2019, or a legal proxy obtained from your bank, broker or other nominee. Alternatively, you may obtain an Admission Card by sending your request and a copy of your proof of ownership to Corporate Secretarywriting at Parker-Hannifin Corporation, 6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124. You44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, or by calling (216) 896-3000.

84LOGO


Other Matters

Shareholders’ Proposals

We must also bringreceive at our principal executive offices by May 26, 2023 any proposal of a photo ID.shareholder intended to be presented at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and to be included in our proxy, notice of meeting and proxy statement related to the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such proposals should be submitted to us by certified mail, return receipt requested. Proposals of shareholders submitted outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposals, in connection with the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by us in accordance with our advance notice procedures, which require that shareholders that desire to submit Non-Rule 14a-8 proposals submit the applicable notice to us no earlier than June 28, 2023 and no later than July 28, 2023. Our proxy related to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders gives discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote with respect to all Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposals received by us after August 13, 2022. Our proxy related to the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will give discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote with respect to all Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposals received by us after August 12, 2023.

For security purposes, no cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, backpacks, briefcases or packages will be permittedShareholders who wish to submit Director nominees for inclusion in our proxy statement for the meeting room or adjacent areas,2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must meet the ownership and other items will be subject to search.

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

Joseph R. Leonti
Secretary

September 23, 2019

Exhibit A

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

AMENDED AND RESTATED2016 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

This Parker-Hannifin Corporationrequirements for proxy access set forth in our Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (thePlan) has been approvedRegulations. For the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such nominations must be received by us no earlier than April 26, 2023 and no later than May 26, 2023.

In addition to satisfying the requirements under our Amended and Restated Regulations, if a shareholder intends to comply with the universal proxy rules and to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees, the shareholder must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, which notice, in order to satisfy the requirements of our Amended and Restated Regulations, must be postmarked or transmitted electronically to us at our principal executive offices no later than 90 nor more than 120 calendar days prior to the one-year anniversary date of the preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders (for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, no later than July 28, 2023 and not before June 28, 2023). It is also possible that certain other deadlines would apply under our Amended and Restated Regulations. For instance, if the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled for a date more than 90 calendar days prior to or more than 120 calendar days after the anniversary of the preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders, notice by the Human Resourcesshareholder to be timely must be delivered no later than the later of the 90th calendar day prior to such Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Compensationthe tenth calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is first made.

Shareholder Recommendations for Director Nominees

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of thewill consider shareholder recommendations for nominees for election to our Board of Directors (theCommittee) ofif such recommendations are in writing and set forth the information listed below. Such recommendations must be submitted to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, (theCompany)6035 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141, Attention: Secretary, and must be received at our executive offices on August 15, 2019 and shall be effective October 23, 2019, subject to and contingent upon its approval byor before June 30 of each year in anticipation of the Companys shareholders.following Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All shareholder recommendations for Director nominees must set forth the following information:

 

A.1.

The shareholdersname and address of the Company approvedshareholder recommending the Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the2016 Omnibus Plan)candidate for consideration as such information appears on October 26, 2016, after whichour records, the 2016 Omnibus Plan wasamendedtelephone number where such shareholder can be reached during normal business hours, the number of common shares owned by such shareholder and the length of time such shares have been owned by the shareholder; if such person is not a shareholder of record or if such shares are owned by an entity, reasonable evidence of such person’s beneficial ownership of such shares or such person’s authority to apply aone-year minimum Service requirement to stock options and stock appreciation rights effective April 19, 2017.act on behalf of such entity;

 

B.2.

16,000,000 shares of Common StockComplete information as to the identity and qualifications of the Company were initially reservedproposed nominee, including the full legal name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers and other contact information, and the principal occupation and employment of the candidate recommended for issuance underconsideration, including his or her occupation for at least the 2016 Omnibus Plan, in addition to shares then subject to outstanding awards underpast five years, with a reasonably detailed description of the Companys 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the2009 Plan) which were subsequently cancelled or forfeited.background, education, professional affiliations and business and other relevant experience (including Directorships, employment and civic activities) and qualifications of the candidate;

 

C.3.

As of August 23, 2019, there remain 7,389,238 shares of Common StockThe reasons why, in the opinion of the Company available for issuance underrecommending shareholder, the 2016 Omnibus Planproposed nominee is qualified and the shares subject to awards under the 2009 Plan have been exhausted.

D.

Under section 17 of the 2016 Omnibus Plan, the Committee generally has the authority to amend and modify the 2016 Omnibus Plan for any purpose permitted by law (unless it would materially adversely affect the right of a participant for previously granted awards and subject to shareholder approval when required).

E.

The Committee has concluded that it is necessary and appropriate to amend and restate the 2016 Omnibus Plan to: (1) increase the number of shares available to be awarded thereunder, and (2) modify the fungible share ratio from 3.69 shares for every share subject to a full value award to 4.07 shares for every share subject to such an award, and to seek approval for such amendment and restatement from the shareholders of the Company.

F.

The Company hereby amends and restates the 2016 Omnibus Plan to read as follows:

1.

ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND TERM OF PLAN.

1.1

Establishment; Amendment and Restatement. The 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Planiswas previously established effective as of October 26, 2016, the date of approval of the Plan at the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of shareholders (the “2016 Approval Date”). This Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan is effective October 23, 2019 (the “2019 Approval Date”).

1.2

Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain and reward persons performing services for the Company and its Subsidiaries by motivating such persons to contribute to the growth and profitability of the Company and its Subsidiaries. The Company intends that Awards granted pursuant to the Plan be exempt from or comply with Section 409A of the Code (including any amendments or replacements of such section), and the Plan shall be so construed.

1.3

Term of Plan. The Plan shall continue in effect until its termination by the Committee; provided, however, that, to the extent required by applicable law, all Awards shall be granted, if at all, within ten (10) years from the 2016 Approval Date.

2.

DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION.

2.1

Definitions. The following terms shall have their respective meanings set forth below:

(a)

Award means any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Unrestricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Dividend Equivalent Right granted under the Plan.

(b)

Award Agreement means a written or electronic agreement between the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms, conditions and restrictions of the Award granted to the Participant.

(c)

Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)

Cause means:

(i)

a material breach by a Participant of the duties and responsibilities of the Participant (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) which is demonstrably willful and deliberate on the Participant’s part, which is committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company and which is not remedied in a reasonable period of time after receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; or

(ii)

the commission by the Participant of a felony involving moral turpitude.

The determination of Cause shall be made by the Committee in its sole discretion and shall be final and conclusive. The Company must notify the Participant that it believes “Cause” has occurred within ninety (90) days of its knowledge of the event or condition constituting Cause.

(e)

Change in Control means the occurrence of one of the following events:

(i)

any “person” (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board (the “Company Voting Securities”); provided, however, that the event described in this paragraph shall not be deemedsuited to be a Change in Control by virtue of any of the following situations: (A) an acquisition by the Company or any Subsidiary; (B) an acquisition by any employee benefit plan sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary; (C) an acquisition by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; (D) aNon-Control Transaction (as defined in paragraph (iii)); (E) as pertains to an individual Participant, any acquisition by the Participant or any group of persons (within the meaning of Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) including the Participant (or any entity in which the Participant or a group of persons including the Participant, directly or indirectly, holds a majority of the voting power of such entity’s outstanding voting interests); or (F) the acquisition of Company Voting Securities from the Company, if a majority of the Board approves a resolution providing expressly that the acquisition pursuant to this clause (F) does not constitute a Change in Control under this paragraph (i);

(ii)

individuals who, at the beginning of any period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; provided, that any person becoming a director subsequent to the beginning of such twenty-four (24) month period, whose election,

or nomination for election, by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the directors comprising the Incumbent Board who are then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director, without objection to such nomination) shall be, for purposes of this paragraph (ii), considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board; provided, however, that no individual initially elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall be deemed to be a member of the Incumbent Board;

(iii)

the consummation of a merger, consolidation, share exchange or similar form of corporate reorganization of the Company or any Subsidiary that requires the approval of the Company’s shareholders, whether for such transaction or the issuance of securities in connection with the transaction or otherwise (a “Business Combination”), unless (A) immediately following such Business Combination: (1) more than 50% of the total voting power of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (the “Surviving Corporation”) or, if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation which directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership of 100% of the voting securities eligible to elect directors of the Surviving Corporation (the “Parent Corporation”), is represented by Company Voting Securities that were outstanding immediately prior to the Business Combination (or, if applicable, shares into which such Company Voting Securities were converted pursuant to such Business Combination), and such voting power among the holders thereof is in substantially the same proportion as the voting power of such Company Voting Securities among the holders thereof immediately prior to the Business Combination, (2) no person (other than any employee benefit plan sponsored or maintained by the Surviving Corporation or the Parent Corporation) is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to elect directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation), and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation), following the Business Combination, were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the Board’s approval of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Business Combination (a “Non-Control Transaction”) or (B) the Business Combination is effected by means of the acquisition of Company Voting Securities from the Company, and a majority of the Board approves a resolution providing expressly that such Business Combination does not constitute a Change in Control under this paragraph (iii); or

(iv)

the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 20% of the Company Voting Securities as a result of the acquisition of Company Voting Securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of Company Voting Securities outstanding, increases the percentage of shares beneficially owned by such person; provided, that if a Change in Control would occur as a result of such an acquisition by the Company (if not for the operation of this sentence), and after the Company’s acquisition such person becomes the beneficial owner of

additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control shall then occur.

Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, if a Participant’s employment is terminated prior to a Change in Control and the Participant reasonably demonstrates that such termination was at the request of a third party who has indicated an intention or taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change in Control (such a termination of employment an “Anticipatory Termination”), then for all purposes of this Plan, the date immediately prior to the date of such Anticipatory Termination shall be deemed to be the date of a Change in Control for such Participant.

(f)

Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.

(g)

Committee means the Human Resources and Compensation Committee or such other committee or subcommittee of the Board, if any, duly appointed to administer the Plan and having such powers in each instance as shall be specified by the Board consisting of two or more members of the Board each of whom is intended to be a“non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule16b-3 (or any successor rule) of the Exchange Act, an “outside director” under regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code, and an “independent director” under the New York Stock Exchange listing rules. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board.

(h)

Common Stock means the common stock of the Company, as adjusted from time to time in accordance withSection 4.3.

(i)

Company means Parker-Hannifin Corporation, an Ohio corporation, or any successor corporation.

(j)

Detrimental Activity means any conduct or activity, whether or not related to the business of the Company or a Subsidiary, that is determined in individual cases, by the Committee or its express delegate, to be detrimental to the interests of the Company or a Subsidiary, including without limitation (i) the rendering of services to an organization, or engaging in a business, that is, in the judgment of the Committee or its express delegate, in competition with the Company; (ii) the disclosure to anyone outside of the Company, or the use for any purpose other than the Company’s business, of confidential information or material related to the Company, whether acquired by the Participant during or after employment with the Company; (iii) fraud, embezzlement,theft-in-office or other illegal activity; or (iv) a violation of the Company’s Code of Ethics or other policies.

(k)

Director means a member of the Board.

(l)

Disability, except as provided inSection 15(d), has the same meaning as provided under the applicable Long-term Disability Plan, or other Company policy.

(m)

Dividend Equivalent Right means the right of a Participant, granted at the discretion of the Committee or as otherwise provided by the Plan, to receive a cash payment or a credit for the account of such Participant in an amount equal to the cash dividends paid on one share of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock represented by an Award held by such Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Dividend Equivalent Rights shall be granted with respect to any Option or SAR.

(n)

Employee means any person treated as an employee (including an Officer or a Director who is also treated as an employee) in the records of the Company or any of its

Subsidiaries. The Company shall determine in good faith and in the exercise of its discretion whether an individual has become or has ceased to be an Employee and the effective date of such individual’s employment or termination of employment, as the case may be. For purposes of an individual’s rights, if any, under the terms of the Plan as of the time of the Company’s determination of whether or not the individual is an Employee, all such determinations by the Company shall be final, binding and conclusive as to such rights, if any, notwithstanding that the Company or any court of law or governmental agency may subsequently make a contrary determination as to such individual’s status as an Employee.

(o)

Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.

(p)

Fair Market Value means, as of any date, the value of a share of Common Stock or other property as determined by the Committee, in its discretion; provided, however, that the Fair Market Value as established by the Committee from time to time shall be determined in accordance with applicable laws and regulations (which determination shall, to the extent applicable, be made in a manner that complies with Section 409A), and such determination shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes.

(q)

Good Reason means, without a Participant’s express written consent, the occurrence of any of the following events after a Change in Control:

(i)

the assignment to the Participant of any duties inconsistent in any adverse respect with the Participant’s position(s), duties, responsibilities or status with the Company immediately prior to such Change in Control; or

(ii)

an adverse change in the Participant’s reporting responsibilities, titles or offices with the Company as in effect immediately prior to such Change in Control; or

(iii)

any removal or involuntary termination of the Participant from the Company other than as expressly permitted by this Plan or any failure tore-elect the Participant to any position with the Company held by the Participant immediately prior to such Change in Control; or

(iv)

a reduction by the Company in the Participant’s rate of annual base salary as in effect immediately prior to such Change in Control or as the same may be increased from time to time thereafter; or

(v)

any requirement of the Company that the Participant (A) be based anywhere more than twenty-five (25) miles from the facility where the Participant is located at the time of the Change in Control or (B) travel on Company business to an extent substantially more burdensome than the travel obligations of the Participant immediately prior to such Change in Control; or

(vi)

the failure of the Company to (A) continue in effect any employee benefit plan or compensation plan in which the Participant is participating immediately prior to such Change in Control, or the taking of any action by the Company which would adversely affect the Participant’s participation in or reduce the Participant’s benefits under any such plan (including the failure to provide the Participant with a level of discretionary incentive award grants consistent with the Company’s grants of such awards to the Participant during the three-Year period immediately prior to the Change in Control), (B) provide the Participant and the Participant’s dependents with welfare benefits (including, without limitation, medical, prescription, dental, disability, salary continuance, employee life, group life, accidental death and dismemberment

and travel accident insurance plans and programs) in accordance with the most favorable plans, practices, programs and policies of the Company and the Affiliated Group in effect for the Participant immediately prior to such Change in Control, (C) provide fringe benefits in accordance with the most favorable plans, practices, programs and policies of the Company and the Affiliated Group in effect for the Participant immediately prior to such Change in Control, or (D) provide the Participant with paid vacation in accordance with the most favorable plans, policies, programs and practices of the Company and the Affiliated Group as in effect for the Participant immediately prior to such Change in Control, unless in the case of any violation of (A), (B) or (C) above, the Participant is permitted to participate in other plans, programs or arrangements which provide the Participant (and, if applicable, the Participant’s dependents) with no less favorable benefits at no greater cost to the Participant; or

(vii)

the failure of the Company to obtain an agreement from any successor to the Company to assume and agree to perform the obligations under the Plan in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform, except where such assumption occurs by operation of law.

Any event or condition described in Sections 2(q)(i) through (vi) which occurs prior to a Change in Control, but was at the request of a third party, shall constitute Good Reason following a Change in Control for purposes of this Plan (as if a Change in Control had occurred immediately prior to the occurrence of such event or condition) notwithstanding that it occurred prior to the Change in Control. For purposes of this Plan, any good faith determination of Good Reason made by a Participant shall be conclusive;provided,however, that an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action taken in good faith and which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by a Participant shall not constitute Good Reason. The Participant’s right to terminate employment for Good Reason shall not be affected by the Participant’s incapacitation due to mental or physical illness and the Participant’s continued employment shall not constitute consent to or a waiver of rights with respect to any event or condition constituting Good Reason. The Participant must provide notice of termination within ninety (90) days of his knowledge of an event or condition constituting Good Reason under the Plan. A transaction which results in the Company no longer being a publicly traded entity shall not in and of itself be treated as Good Reason unless and until one of the events or conditions set forth in Sections 2(q)(i) through (vii) occurs.

(r)

Grant Date means the date as of which an Award is determined to be effective and designated in a resolution by the Committee and is granted pursuant to the Plan. The Grant Date shall not be earlier than the date of the resolution and action therein by the Committee.

(s)

Grant Date Fair Market Value means, as of any date, the value of a share of Common Stock determined as follows: (i) the closing sale price per share of Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange—Composite Transactions or the principal exchange on which shares are then trading, if any, or if there are no sales on such day, on the next preceding trading day during which a sale occurred; and (ii) in the absence of such markets for the shares of Common Stock, the Grant Date Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee in good faith (which determination shall, to the extent applicable, be made in a manner that complies with Section 409A), and such determination shall be final, conclusive and binding for all purposes.

(t)

Incentive Stock Option means any Option that is designated in the applicable Award Agreement as an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and that meets the requirements thereof.

(u)

Insider Trading Policy means the written policy of the Company pertaining to the purchase, sale, transfer or other disposition of the Company’s equity securities by Directors, Officers, Employees or other service providers who may possess material, nonpublic information regarding the Company or its securities.

(v)

Net-Exercise means a procedure by which the Participant will be issued a number of whole shares of Stock upon the exercise of an Option or SAR determined in accordance with the following formula:

N =X(A-B)/A, where:

N = the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to the Participant upon exercise;

X = the total number of shares with respect to which the Participant has elected to exercise;

A = the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Common Stock determined on the exercise date; and

B = the exercise price per share (as defined in the Participant’s Award Agreement).

(w)

Nonstatutory Stock Option means any Option awarded under this plan that is not specifically designated as an Incentive Stock Option (as set forth in the Award Agreement) or which does not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.

(x)

Officer means any person designated by the Board as an officer of the Company.

(y)

Option means a right granted underSection 6 to purchase Common Stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Plan. Options may be either Nonstatutory Stock Options or Incentive Stock Options.

(z)

Participant means any eligible person who has been granted one or more Awards.

(aa)

Performance-Based Exception means the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code.

(bb)

Performance Bonus Plan means the Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2015 Performance Bonus Plan, as the same may be amended from time to time, or any successor thereto.

(cc)

Performance Goals mean the measurable performance objective or objectives established by the Committee pursuant to this Plan, including, for an Award intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, any “Management Objectives” (as such term is defined in the Performance Bonus Plan) established for such Award pursuant to the Performance Bonus Plan.

(dd)

Qualifying Termination means a Participant’s separation from service (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(h)) that: (i) follows a Change in Control and (ii) occurs either (a) by the Company other than for Cause or (b) by the Participant for Good Reason.

(ee)

Restricted Stock Award means an Award granted pursuant toSection 8, other than an Unrestricted Stock Award granted pursuant toSection 8.4.

(ff)

Restricted Stock Unit means a right granted to a Participant pursuant toSection 9 to receive a share of Common Stock on a date determined in accordance with the provisions of such Section and the Participant’s Award Agreement.

(gg)

Retirement shall have the meaning set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.

(hh)

Section 409A means Section 409A of the Code.

(ii)

Securities Act means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder.

(jj)

Service means, except as provided inSection 15, a Participant’s employment or service with the Company and its Subsidiaries, whether in the capacity of an Employee or a Director. A Participant’s service for purposes of this Plan is deemed to have terminated in accordance with the Company’s policies on termination as may be in effect from time to time. The Company, in its sole discretion, shall determine whether a Participant’s Service has terminated and the effective date of, and reason for, such termination.

(kk)

Stock Appreciation Right (or “SAR”) means an Award granted underSection 7.

(ll)

Subsidiary means a corporation, company or other entity (i) at least fifty percent (50%) of whose outstanding shares or securities (representing the right to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority) are now or hereafter, owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company, or (ii) which does not have outstanding shares or securities (as may be the case in a partnership, limited liability company, joint venture or unincorporated association), but at least fifty percent (50%) of whose ownership interest representing the right generally to make decisions for such other entity is now or hereafter, owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company; provided, however, that for purposes of determining whether any person may be a Participant eligible for a grant of Incentive Stock Options, the term “Subsidiary” shall have the meaning given to such term in Section 424(f) of the Code.

(mm)

Substitute Awards means Awards that are granted in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, outstanding awards previously granted by an entity acquired directly or indirectly by the Company or with which the Company directly or indirectly combines.

(nn)

Ten Percent Shareholder means any Participant who owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (or, as applicable, of any “parent” or “subsidiary” as defined in Sections 424(e) and (f) of the Code) within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

(oo)

Unrestricted Stock Award means an Award granted pursuant toSection 8.4.

(pp)

Vesting Conditions mean those conditions established by the Award Agreement in accordance with the Plan prior to the satisfaction of which shares subject to an Award remain subject to forfeiture or a repurchase option in favor of the Company exercisable for the Participant’s monetary purchase price, if any, for such shares upon the Participant’s termination of Service.

2.2

Construction. Captions and titles contained in this Plan are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of the Plan. Except when otherwise indicated by the context, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. The terms “or” and “including” are not intended to be exclusive or limiting, respectively, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

3.

ADMINISTRATION.

3.1

Administration by the Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. All questions of interpretation of the Plan, of any Award Agreement or of any other form of agreement or other document employed by the Company in the administration of the Plan or of any Award shall be determined by the Committee, and such determinations shall be final, binding and conclusive upon all Participants and other persons having an interest in the Plan or such Award. Any and all actions, decisions and determinations taken or made by the Committee in the exercise of its discretion pursuant to the Plan or Award Agreement or other agreement thereunder (other than determining questions of interpretation pursuant to the preceding sentence) shall be final, binding and conclusive upon all persons having an interest therein.

3.2

Authority of the Board. The Board may reserve to itself any or all of the authority and responsibility of the Committee under the Plan or may act as administrator of the Plan for any and all purposes. To the extent the Board has reserved any authority and responsibility or during any time that the Board is acting as administrator of the Plan, it shall have all the powers of the Committee hereunder, and any reference herein to the Committee (other than in thisSection 3.2) shall include the Board. To the extent any action of the Board under the Plan conflicts with actions taken by the Committee, the actions of the Board shall control.

3.3

Authority of Officers. Notwithstanding the above, the Board or Committee may, by resolution, expressly delegate to a special committee, consisting of one or more Directors or Officers, the authority, within specified parameters established by the Board or Committee, to: (i) designate Employees to be recipients of Awards under the Plan, and (ii) to determine the number of such Awards to be received by any such Participants; provided, however, that such delegation of duties and responsibilities to an Officer may not be made with respect to the grant of Awards to Employees who are subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on the Grant Date, or who as of the Grant Date are reasonably anticipated to become “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code during the term of the Award. The acts of such delegates shall be treated hereunder as acts of the Board or Committee, as applicable, and such delegates shall report regularly to the Board or Committee, as applicable, regarding the delegated duties and responsibilities and any Awards so granted.

3.4

Powers of the Committee. In addition to any other powers set forth in the Plan and subject to the provisions of the Plan and the Committee charter, the Committee (or its delegate) shall have the full and final power and authority, in its discretion:

(a)

to determine the persons to whom, and the time or times at which, Awards shall be granted and the number of shares of Common Stock to be subject to each Award;

(b)

to determine the type of Award granted;

(c)

to determine the Fair Market Value of shares of Common Stock or other property;

(d)

to determine the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to each Award (which need not be identical) and any shares acquired pursuant thereto, including, without limitation: (i) except for the procedures set forth herein relating to Options and SARs, the exercise or purchase price of shares pursuant to any Award, (ii) the method of payment for shares purchased pursuant to any Award, (iii) the method for satisfaction of any tax withholding obligation arising in connection with Award, including by the withholding or delivery of shares of Common Stock, (iv) the timing, terms and conditions of the exercisability or vesting of any Award or any shares acquired pursuant thereto, (v) the time of the expiration of any Award, (vi) the effect of the Participant’s termination of Service on any

of the foregoing, and (vii) all other terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any Award or shares acquired pursuant thereto not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan;

(e)

to determine whether an Award will be settled in shares of Common Stock, cash, or in any combination thereof;

(f)

to approve one or more forms of Award Agreement;

(g)

subject to the limitations ofSection 18.3, to amend, modify, extend, cancel or renew any Award or to waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any Award or any shares acquired upon the exercise thereof;

(h)

to accelerate, continue, extend or defer the exercisability of any Award or the vesting of any shares acquired upon the exercise thereof, including with respect to the period following a Participant’s termination of Service;

(i)

to prescribe, amend or rescind rules, guidelines and policies relating to the Plan, or to adoptsub-plans or supplements to, or alternative versions of, the Plan, including, without limitation, as the Committee deems necessary or desirable to comply with the laws or regulations of or to accommodate the tax policy, accounting principles or custom of, foreign jurisdictions whose citizens may be granted Awards;

(j)

to settle all disputes or controversies regarding the Plan and Awards granted under the Plan;

(k)

to amend the Plan, or any Award or Award Agreement granted under the Plan, in any respect that the Committee deems necessary or advisable to address or correct any administrative or compliance failure or potential failure, including in order to bring the Plan or any Awards granted under the plan in compliance with Section 409A.

(l)

to correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement and to make all other determinations and take such other actions with respect to the Plan or any Award as the Committee may deem advisable to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan or applicable law;

(m)

to adopt such procedures orsub-plans as are necessary or appropriate for participation in the Plan by Employees or Directors who are foreign nationals or employed outside of the United States;

(n)

generally, to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as the Committee deems necessary or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company and that are not in conflict with the provisions of the Plan; and

(o)

to delegate any of its authority to any other person or persons that it deems appropriate, provided the delegation does not cause the Plan or any Awards granted under this Plan to fail to qualify for the exemption provided by Rule16b-3 or violate any independence standard contained in the New York Stock Exchange listing requirements.

3.5

Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or the Committee or as Officers or Employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries, members of the Board or the Committee and any officers or employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries to whom authority to act for the Board, the Committee or the Company is delegated shall be indemnified by the Company against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or

in connection with the Plan, or any right granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct in duties; provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after the institution of such action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunity at its own expense to handle and defend the same.Director;

 

4.

SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN.

4.1

Maximum NumberThe disclosure of Shares Issuable. Subject to adjustment as provided inSections 4.2 and4.3,effective October 23, 2019,any relationship of the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that will have been authorized for issuance pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be23,800,000 (consisting of 16,000,000 shares that were approved by shareholders in 2016 and 7,800,000 shares to be approved in 2019) shares of Common Stock, which shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Common Stockcandidate being recommended with us or any combination thereof, plus any shares of Common Stock that, as of the Approval Date, are subject to outstanding awards granted under the Company’s 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”) and are subsequently cancelledour subsidiaries or forfeited to the Company (the “2009 Plan Shares”).

4.2

Share Counting. Each share of Common Stock delivered pursuant to a Stock Optionaffiliates, whether direct or Stock Appreciation Right, and each share of Common Stock delivered pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Dividend Equivalent Right with a per share purchase price equal to at least 100% of the Fair Market Value on the Grant Date, shall be counted against the share limit set forth inSection 4.1 as one (1) share for every one (1) share of Common Stock subject thereto. Each share of Common Stock delivered pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award, Unrestricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Dividend Equivalent Right with a per share or per unit purchase price of less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the Grant Date (a “Full Value Award”) shall be counted against the share limit set forth inSection 4.1 as3.694.07 shares for every one (1) share of Common Stock subject thereto. For the avoidance of doubt, the 2009 Plan Shares shall also count against the share limit set forth in Section 4.1 at the foregoing ratios described in this Section 4.2. If an outstanding Award for any reason expires or is terminated or canceled without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to an Award subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company for an amount not greater than the Participant’s purchase price, the shares of Common Stock allocable to the terminated portion of such Award or such forfeited or repurchased shares of Common Stock shall again be available for issuance under the Plan, provided that with respect to any Full Value Award, the number of shares of Common Stock becoming available for issuance under the Plan pursuant to this sentence shall be3.694.07 shares of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock so terminated, canceled, forfeited or repurchased. Shares of Common Stock shall not be deemed to have been issued pursuant to the Plan with respect to any portion of an Award that is settled in cash. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shares of Common Stock shall not extend or increase the maximum share limit contained inSection 4.1: (i) shares tendered in payment of the exercise price of a stock option, (ii) shares withheld by the Company or any Subsidiary to satisfy a tax withholding obligation, and (iii) shares that are repurchased by the Company with Option proceeds. Moreover, all shares of Common Stock covered by a SAR, to the extent that it is exercised and settled in shares, or any Option subject to aNet-Exercise shall be considered delivered pursuant to the Plan, whether or not shares are actually delivered to the Participant upon exercise of the right. Shares of Common Stock delivered under the Plan as a Substitute Award or in settlement of a Substitute Award shall not reduce or be counted against the shares of Common Stock

available for Awards under the Plan and will not count against the Plan limit as set forth inSection 4.1 to the extent that the rules and regulations of any stock exchange or other trading market on which the shares are listed or traded provide an exemption from shareholder approval for assumption, substitution, conversion, adjustment, or replacement of outstanding awards in connection with mergers, acquisitions, or other corporate combinations.

4.3

Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure. In the event of any equity restructuring (within the meaning of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R as amended from time to time, or any successor financial standard regime that may be applicable to the Company), such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering, or recapitalization through a large, nonrecurring cash dividend, the Committee shall cause there to be an equitable adjustment in the numbers of shares of Common Stock specified inSection 4.1 and thesub-limits specified inSections 6,7,8 and9 of the Plan, and with respect to outstanding Awards, in the number and kind of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Awards, the exercise price, grant price or other price of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Awards, in each case to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, such as a merger, consolidation, or liquidation, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, cause there to be such equitable adjustment as described in the foregoing sentence, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights; provided, however, that, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to any Award shall always be rounded down to a whole number and the exercise price or grant price shall always be rounded up to the nearest whole cent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall not make any adjustment pursuant to thisSection 4.3 that would: (i) cause an Award that is otherwise exempt from Section 409A to become subject to Section 409A, (ii) cause an Award that is subject to Section 409A to fail to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, or (iii) cause an award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception to fail to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be final, conclusive and binding on Participants and other persons having an interest in the Plan or an Award under the Plan.indirect;

 

5.

ELIGIBILITY AND LIMITATIONS.

5.1

Persons Eligible for Awards; Annual Limitations. Awards may be granted onlyA description of all relationships, arrangements and understandings between the proposing shareholder and the candidate and any other person(s) (naming such person(s)) pursuant to Employeeswhich the candidate is being proposed or would serve as a Director, if elected; and Directors. Nonon-employee Director may be granted Awards for more thanten thousand (10,000) Shares of Common Stock within a year.

5.2

Participation in Plan. Awards are granted solely at the discretion of the Committee. Eligible persons may be granted more than one Award. However, eligibility in accordance with this Section shall not entitle any person to be granted an Award, or, having been granted an Award, to be granted an additional Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of thisSection 5, eligible Participants who are service providers to a Subsidiary may be granted Options or Stock Appreciation Rights under this Plan provided that the Subsidiary qualifies as an “eligible issuer of service recipient stock” within the meaning of Section 409A.

 

6.

OPTIONS. Options shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of Shares of Common Stock coveredA written acknowledgment by the Award Agreement, in such form as the Committee shall from timecandidate being recommended that he or she has consented to time establish. The Award Agreement for any Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan shall contain such terms and conditions, consistent with the Plan, as the Committee may determine to be necessary to comply with Section 422 of the Code. An Option may be granted to an eligible Employeebeing considered as a separate Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Incentive Stock Options may be granted onlycandidate, has consented to eligible Participants who are Employees of the Company (or a “parent” or

“subsidiary” as defined in Sections 422(e) and (f) of the Code). No Participant may be granted Options for more thanone million (1,000,000) Shares of Common Stock within a three (3) year period. Award Agreements evidencing Options may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

6.1

Exercise Price. The exercise price for each Option shall be established in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that the exercise price per Share of Common Stock shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Grant Date Fair Market Value. In the caseour undertaking of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder, the exercise price per share of Common Stock shall not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Grant Date Fair Market Value.

6.2

Exercisability and Term of Options. Options shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, Vesting Conditions and restrictions as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Option; provided, however,investigation into that no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such Option. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder, the Incentive Stock Option shall not be exercised after the expiration of five (5) years after the date of grant of such Incentive Stock Option. Subject to the foregoing, unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the grant of an Option, any Option granted under this Plan shall terminate ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of the Option, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its provisions.

6.3

Payment of Exercise Price.

(a)

Forms of Consideration Authorized. Except as otherwise provided below, payment of the exercise price for the number of shares of Common Stock being purchased pursuant to any Option shall be made: (i) in cash or by check or cash equivalent, (ii) subject toSection 6.3(b)(i), by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Common Stock owned by the Participant having a Fair Market Value not less than the exercise price, (iii) subject toSection 6.3(b)(ii), by delivery of a properly executed notice of exercise together with irrevocable instructions to a broker providing for the assignment to the Company of the proceeds of a sale or loan with respect to some or all of the shares being acquired upon the exercise of the Option (including, without limitation, through an exercise complying with the provisions of Regulation T as promulgated from time to time by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) (a “Cashless Exercise”), (iv) by delivery of a properly executed notice electing aNet-Exercise, (v) by such other consideration as may be approved by the Committee from time to time to the extent permitted by applicable law, or (vi) by any combination thereof. The Committee may at any time or from time to time grant Options which do not permit all of the foregoing forms of consideration to be used in payment of the exercise price or which otherwise restrict one or more forms of consideration.

(b)

Limitations on Forms of Consideration.

(i)

Tender of Common Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option may not be exercised by tender to the Company, or attestation to the ownership, of shares of Common Stock to the extent such tender or attestation would constitute a violation of the provisions of any law, regulation or agreement restricting the redemption of the Company’s Common Stock.

(ii)

Cashless Exercise. The Cashless Exercise program is available only if, at the time of exercise, the offer and sale of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan is

registered on a then effective registration statement on FormS-8 under the Securities Act. The Company reserves, at any and all times, the right, in the Company’s sole and absolute discretion, to establish, decline to approve or terminate any program or procedures for the exercise of Options by means of a Cashless Exercise, including with respect to one or more Participants specified by the Company notwithstanding that such program or procedures may be available to other Participants.

6.4

Minimum Vesting Requirement.Options may be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions, or Performance Goals as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award; provided, however, that in no event shall any issuance of Options under the Plan be subject to a Service vesting requirement of less than one (1) year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of any Options granted under the Plan.

6.5

Effect of Termination of Service. Subject to earlier termination of the Option as otherwise provided in this Plan or the terms of the Award Agreement and unless otherwise provided by the Committee or in the Award Agreement, the Participant’s termination of Service shall operate to terminate the Option.

6.6

Extension if Exercise Prevented by Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the exercise of an Option within the applicable time periods set forth in the Award Agreement is prevented by the provisions ofSection 14, the Option shall remain exercisable until thirty (30) days after the date such exercise first would no longer be prevented by such provisions, but in any event no later than ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such Option.

6.7

Certain Provisions Regarding Incentive Stock Options. Notwithstanding anything in thisSection 6 to the contrary, Stock Options designated as Incentive Stock Options shall not be eligible for treatment under the Code as Incentive Stock Options, and shall instead be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options, to the extent that either: (i) the aggregate Fair Market Value of Common Stock (determined as of the Grant Date) with respect to which such Options are exercisable for the first time by the Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and any Subsidiary) exceeds $100,000, taking Options into account in the order in which they were granted, or (ii) such Options otherwise remain exercisable but are not exercised within three (3) months after termination of employment (or such other period of time provided in Section 422 of the Code).

7.

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT AWARDS. SARs shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the Award Agreement, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. A SAR may be granted to an eligible Employee as a separate Award. No Participant may be granted SARs for more thanonemillion (1,000,000) shares of Common Stock in any three (3) year period.

7.1

Grant Price. The grant price for each SAR shall be established in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that the grant price per share for a SAR shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Grant Date Fair Market Value.

7.2

Settlement of SARs. Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying: (i) the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the grant price; by (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the SAR is exercised. The payment upon the SAR exercise shall be in cash, shares of Common Stock of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof, as determined by the Committee in its sole

discretion. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of payout of SARs shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the Award.

7.3

Exercisability and Term of SARs. SARs shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, Vesting Conditions and restrictions as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such SAR; provided, however, that no SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such SAR. Subject to the foregoing, unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the grant of a SAR, any SAR granted under this Plan shall terminate ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of the SAR, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its provisions.

7.4

Minimum Vesting Requirement. SARs may be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions, or Performance Goals as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award; provided, however, that in no event shall any issuance of SARs under the Plan be subject to a Service vesting requirement of less than one (1) year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of any SARs granted under the Plan.

7.5

Effect of Termination of Service. Subject to earlier termination of the SAR as otherwise provided in this Plan or the terms of the Award Agreement and unless otherwise provided by the Committee or in the Award Agreement, the Participant’s termination of Service shall operate to terminate the SAR.

7.6

Extension if Exercise Prevented by Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the exercise of a SAR within the applicable time periods set forth in the Award Agreement is prevented by the provisions ofSection 14, the SAR shall remain exercisable until thirty (30) days after the date such exercise first would no longer be prevented by such provisions, but in any event no later than ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such SAR.

8.

RESTRICTED AND UNRESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS. The Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant or sell Restricted Stock Awards and Unrestricted Stock Awards to Participants in such number as the Committee shall determine. Each grant or sale of a Restricted Stock Award or an Unrestricted Stock Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement and shall be subject to the following provisions:

8.1

Grant of Restricted Stock Award. Each grant or sale of a Restricted Stock Award or an Unrestricted Stock Award shall constitute an immediate transfer of the ownership of shares of Common Stock to the Participant in consideration of the performance of services, subject to the substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer as provided in thisSection 8. A Restricted Stock Award or an Unrestricted Stock Award may be granted to an eligible Employee as a separate Award. No Participant may be granted Restricted Stock Awards or Unrestricted Stock Awards for more thanone million (1,000,000) shares of Common Stock within a three (3) year period. Further, no Restricted Stock Award or Unrestricted Stock Award intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception shall exceed the applicable limitations set out in the Performance Bonus Plan. Restricted Stock Awards and Unrestricted Stock Awards may be granted upon such conditions as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals.

8.2

Purchase Price. Each such grant or sale may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a purchase price payment by such Participant that is greater than, less than or equal to the Fair Market Value at the Grant Date. Any payment of purchase price for Common Stock being purchased pursuant to any Restricted Stock Award or Unrestricted

Stock Award shall be made: (a) in cash or by check or cash equivalent, (b) by such other consideration as may be approved by the Committee from time to time to the extent permitted by applicable law, or (c) by any combination thereof.

8.3

Vesting and Restrictions on Transfer. Shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to any Restricted Stock Award may be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions or Performance Goals as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award; provided, however, that in no event shall any issuance of Restricted Stock Awards under the Plan be subject to a Service vesting requirement of less than one (1) year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of any Restricted Stock Award granted under the Plan. During any period in which shares acquired pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award remain subject to Vesting Conditions, such shares may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise disposed of other than as provided inSection 12. The Committee, in its discretion, may provide in any Award Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Award that, if the satisfaction of Vesting Conditions with respect to any shares subject to such Restricted Stock Award would otherwise occur on a day on which the sale of such shares would violate the provisions of the Insider Trading Policy, then satisfaction of the Vesting Conditions automatically shall be determined on the next trading day on which the sale of such shares would not violate the Insider Trading Policy. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Common Stock hereunder and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Common Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.

8.4

Unrestricted Stock Awards under LTIP Program. Notwithstanding any provisions of Section 8 above, Unrestricted Stock Awards may be granted to Participants under the Plan, free of any Vesting Conditions, upon completion of the applicable performance period pursuant to a performance based incentive program having a performance period of not less than 12 months.

8.5

Voting Rights; Dividends and Distributions. Except as provided in this Section,Section 8.6 and any Award Agreement, during any period in which shares acquired pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award remain subject to Vesting Conditions, the Participant shall have all of the rights of a shareholder of the Company holding shares of Common Stock, including the right to vote such shares and to receive all dividendsindividual’s background, education, experience and other distributions paid with respect to such shares. However,qualifications in the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Common Stock or other property or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described inSection 4.3, any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant is entitled by reason of the Participant’s Restricted Stock Award shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as the shares subject to the Restricted Stock Award with respect to which such dividends or distributions were paid or adjustments were made. Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividends or other distributions with respect to any Restricted Stock Award that vests based on the achievement of Performance Goals shall be accumulated until such Award is earned, and such dividends or other distributions shall not be paid if such Performance Goals are not satisfied.

8.6

Effect of Termination of Service. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Award, if a Participant’s Service terminates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (including the Participant’s death or disability), then the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any shares acquired by the Participant pursuant to

Restricted Stock Awards which remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant’s termination of Service.

9.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS. Restricted Stock Units shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. Restricted Stock Units may be granted to an eligible Employee as a separate Award. No Participant may be granted Restricted Stock Units for more thanone million (1,000,000) shares of Common Stock within a three (3) year period. Further, no Award of Restricted Stock Units intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception shall exceed the applicable limitations set out in of the Performance Bonus Plan. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Units may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

9.1

Grant of Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units may be granted upon such conditions as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals.

9.2

Purchase Price. No monetary payment (other than applicable tax withholding, if any) shall be required as a condition of receiving Restricted Stock Units, the consideration for which shall be services actually rendered to (or for the benefit of) the Company or a Subsidiary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if required by applicable state corporate law, or if deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee to ensure that taxation of the Restricted Stock Units does not occur until receipt of the Common Stock by the Participant, or, at the discretion of the Committee, to avoid other undesirable tax consequences to the Participant, the Participant shall furnish consideration in the form of cash or past services rendered to (or for the benefit of) the Company or a Subsidiary having a value not less than the par value of the shares of Common Stock issued upon settlement of the Award of Restricted Stock Units.

9.3

Vesting. Restricted Stock Unit may be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions or Performance Goals as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award; provided, however, that in no event shall any issuance of Restricted Stock Units under the Plan be subject to a Service vesting requirement of less than one (1) year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, accelerate the vesting of any Restricted Stock Units granted under the Plan. The Committee, in its discretion, may provide in any Award Agreement evidencing an Award of Restricted Stock Units that, if the satisfaction of Vesting Conditions with respect to any shares subject to the Award would otherwise occur on a day on which the sale of such shares would violate the provisions of the Insider Trading Policy, then satisfaction of the Vesting Conditions automatically shall be determined on the first to occur of: (a) the next trading day on which the sale of such shares would not violate the Insider Trading Policy; or (b) the later of: (i) the last day of the calendar year in which the original vesting date occurred or (ii) the last day of the Company’s taxable year in which the original vesting date occurred.

9.4

Voting Rights, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions. Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Common Stock represented by Restricted Stock Units until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing any Restricted Stock Units that the Participant shall be entitled to Dividend Equivalent Rights with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Common Stock during the period beginning on the date such Award is granted and ending, with respect to each share subject to the Award, on the earlier of the date the Award is settled or the date on which it is terminated. Such Dividend

Equivalent Rights, if any, may be paid in cash or by crediting the Participant with additional whole Restricted Stock Units as of the date of payment of such cash dividends on Common Stock, as provided in the Award Agreement. In the event that the Dividend Equivalent Rights are creditedCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee desires to the Participant, the number of additional Restricted Stock Units (rounded to the nearest whole number)do so, has consented to be so credited shall be determined by dividing: (a) the amount of cash dividends paid on such date with respectnamed in our Proxy Statement and has consented to the number of shares of Common Stock represented by the Restricted Stock Units previously credited to the Participant by (b) the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock on such date. Such additional Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions and shall be settled in the same manner and at the same timeserve as the Restricted Stock Units originally subject to the Award. In the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Common Stock or other property or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described inSection 4.3, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the Participant’s Restricted Stock Units so that it represents the right to receive upon settlement any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant would be entitled by reason of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon settlement of the Award, and all such new, substituted or additional securities or other property shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as are applicable to the Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Dividend Equivalent Rights with respect to any Restricted Stock Units that vest based on the achievement of Performance Goals shall be accumulated until such Restricted Stock Units are earned, and such dividends or other distributions shall not be paidDirector, if such Performance Goals are not satisfied.elected.

 

9.5

Effect of Termination of Service. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Unit Award, if a Participant’s Service terminates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (including the Participant’s death or disability), then the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any Restricted Stock Units pursuant to the Award which remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant’s termination of Service.

 

9.6

Settlement of Restricted Stock Units. The Company shall issue to the Participant on the date on which Restricted Stock Units subject to the Participant’s Award vest or on such other date determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement one (1) share of Common Stock (or any other new, substituted or additional securities or other property pursuant to an adjustment described inSection 9.4) for each Restricted Stock Unit then becoming vested or otherwise to be settled on such date, subject to the withholding of applicable taxes, if any. If permitted by the Committee, the Participant may elect, under procedures established by the Committee consistent with the requirements of Section 409A, to defer receipt of all or any portion of the shares of Common Stock or other property otherwise issuable to the Participant pursuant to this Section. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in any Award Agreement for settlement of any Restricted Stock Units by payment to the Participant in cash of an amount equal to the Fair Market Value on the payment date of the shares of Common Stock or other property otherwise issuable to the Participant pursuant to this Section.

2022 Proxy Statement85

10.

DETRIMENTAL ACTIVITY. The Committee may cancel any unexpired, unpaid or deferred Awards at any time if the Participant is not in compliance with all applicable provisions of this Plan or with the terms of an Award Agreement or if the Participant engages in Detrimental Activity. The Committee may, in its discretion and as a condition to the exercise of an Award, require a Participant to acknowledge that he or she is in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Plan and of any Award Agreement and has not engaged in any Detrimental Activity. Any Award Agreement may provide that if a Participant, either during employment by the Company or within a


specified period after termination of such employment, shall engage in any Detrimental Activity, and the Committee shall so find, forthwith upon notice of such finding, the Participant shall:

COMPANY INFORMATION

(a)

return to the Company, in exchange for payment by the Company of any amount actually paid therefor by the Participant, all shares of Common Stock that the Participant has not disposed of that were issued pursuant to this Plan within a specified period prior to the date of the commencement of such Detrimental Activity; and

Parker Corporate Headquarters

(b)

with respect to any shares of Common Stock so acquired that the Participant has disposed of, pay to the Company in cash the difference between:

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

(i)

any amount actually paid therefore by the Participant pursuant to this Plan; and

6035 Parkland Boulevard

(ii)

the Fair Market Value of such share of Common Stock on the date of such acquisition.

To the extent that such amounts are not paid to the Company, the Company may set off the amounts so payable to it against any amounts that may be owing from time to time by the Company to the Participant, whether as wages, deferred compensation (to the extent permitted by Section 409A) or vacation pay or in the form of any other benefit or for any other reason.Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141

216 896 3000

 

11.

STANDARD FORMS OF AWARD AGREEMENTS.

 

11.1

Award Agreements. Each Award shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the appropriate form of Award Agreement approved by the Committee and as amended from time to time. No Award or purported Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Any Award Agreement may consist of an appropriate form of Notice of Grant and a form of Agreement incorporated therein by reference, or such other form or forms, including electronic media, as the Committee may approve from time to time.

Stock Information

New York Stock Exchange

Ticker symbol: PH

www.phstock.com

 

11.2

Authority to Vary Terms. The Committee shall have the authority from time to time to vary the terms of any standard form of Award Agreement either in connection with the grant or amendment of an individual Award or in connection with the authorization of a new standard form or forms; provided, however, that the terms and conditions of any such new, revised or amended standard form or forms of Award Agreement are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.

 

12.

CHANGE IN CONTROL. Subject to the requirements and limitations ofSection 409A and Section 15, if applicable, the Committee may provide for any one or more of the following:

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Cleveland, Ohio

 

12.1

Accelerated Vesting. The Committee may, in its discretion, provide in any Award Agreement or, in the event of a Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide for the acceleration of the exercisability, vesting and/or settlement in connection with such Change in Control of each or any outstanding Award or portion thereof and shares acquired pursuant thereto upon such conditions, including termination of the Participant’s Service prior to, upon, or following such Change in Control, to such extent as the Committee shall determine.

 

12.2

Assumption, Continuation or Substitution. In the event of a Change in Control, the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing corporation or other business entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “Acquiror”), may, without the consent of any Participant, either assume or continue the Company’s rights and obligations under each or any Award or portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control or substitute for each or any such outstanding Award or portion thereof a substantially equivalent award with respect to the Acquiror’s stock, as applicable. For purposes of this Section, if so determined

Transfer Agent & Registrar

by the Committee, in its discretion, an Award denominated in shares of Common Stock shall be deemed assumed if, following the Change in Control, the Award confers the right to receive, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, for each share of Common Stock subject to the Award immediately prior to the Change in Control, the consideration (whether stock, cash, other securities or property or a combination thereof) to which a holder of a share of Common Stock on the effective date of the Change in Control was entitled; provided, however, that if such consideration is not solely common stock of the Acquiror, the Committee may, with the consent of the Acquiror, provide for the consideration to be received upon the exercise or settlement of the Award, for each share of Common Stock subject to the Award, to consist solely of common stock of the Acquiror equal in Fair Market Value to the per share consideration received by holders of Common Stock pursuant to the Change in Control. If any portion of such consideration may be received by holders of Common Stock pursuant to the Change in Control on a contingent or delayed basis, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, determine such Fair Market Value per share as of the time of the Change in Control on the basis of the Committee’s good faith estimate of the present value of the probable future payment of such consideration. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee or in the applicable Award Agreement, any Award or portion thereof which is neither assumed or continued by the Acquiror in connection with the Change in Control nor exercised or settled as of the time of consummation of the Change in Control shall terminate and cease to be outstanding effective as of the time of consummation of the Change in Control.Equiniti Trust Company

EQ Shareowner Services

P.O. Box 64854

St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854

Telephone 800 468 9716

www.shareowneronline.com

 

12.3

Cash-Out of Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion and without the consent of any Participant, determine that, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, each or any Award or a portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control and not previously exercised or settled shall be canceled in exchange for a payment with respect to each vested share (and each unvested share, if so determined by the Committee) of Common Stock subject to such canceled Award in: (i) cash, (ii) stock of the Company or of a corporation or other business entity a party to the Change in Control, or (iii) other property which, in any such case, shall be in an amount having a Fair Market Value equal to the Fair Market Value of the consideration to be paid per share of Common Stock in the Change in Control, reduced by the exercise or purchase price per share, if any, under such Award. If any portion of such consideration may be received by holders of Common Stock pursuant to the Change in Control on a contingent or delayed basis, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, determine such Fair Market Value per share as of the time of the Change in Control on the basis of the Committee’s good faith estimate of the present value of the probable future payment of such consideration. In the event such determination is made by the Committee, the amount of such payment (reduced by applicable withholding taxes, if any) shall be paid to Participants in respect of the vested portions of their canceled Awards as soon as practicable following the date of the Change in Control and in respect of the unvested portions of their canceled Awards in accordance with the vesting schedules applicable to such Awards.

 

12.4

Section 409A. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, and except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, if: (i) an Award is considered a “deferral of compensation” (within the meaning of Section 409A), (ii) the Award becomes vested or restrictions lapse, expire or terminate upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, and (iii) either such Change in Control is not treated as a “change in ownership” of the Company, a “change in the effective control” of the Company or a “change in the effective ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company (within the meaning of Section 409A) or payment of the Award is not otherwise permitted upon the Change in Control under Section 409A without the imposition of taxes and penalties, then even though such Award may be deemed to be vested or restrictions lapse, expire or terminate upon the occurrence

Investor Contact

of the Change in Control, payment will be made, to the extent necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 409A, to the Participant on the earliest of: (A) the Participant’s “separation from service” with the Company (as defined inSection 15(b)), provided that if the Participant is a “specified employee” (determined pursuant to the Company’s policy for determining specified employees in accordance with Section 409A), the payment date shall be the first day of the seventh (7th) month after the date of the Participant’s separation from service; (B) the date payment otherwise would have been made in the absence of any provisions in this Plan to the contrary (provided such date is permissible under Section 409A); or (C) the Participant’s death.

13.

TAX WITHHOLDING.

13.1

Tax Withholding in General. The Company shall have the right to deduct from any and all payments made under the Plan, or to require the Participant, through payroll withholding, cash payment or otherwise, to make adequate provision for, the federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld by the Company and its Subsidiaries with respect to an Award or the shares acquired pursuant thereto. The Company shall have no obligation to deliver shares of Common Stock, to release shares of Common Stock from an escrow established pursuant to an Award Agreement, or to make any payment in cash under the Plan until the required tax withholding obligations have been satisfied by the Participant.

13.2

Withholding in Shares. The Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to deduct from the shares of Common Stock issuable to a Participant upon the exercise or settlement of an Award, or to accept from the Participant the tender of, a number of whole shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value, as determined by the Company, equal to all or any part of the tax withholding obligations of the Company and its Subsidiaries. The Fair Market Value of any shares of Common Stock withheld or tendered to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations shall not exceed the amount determined by the applicable minimum statutory withholding rates.

14.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECURITIES LAW. The grant of Awards and the issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant to any Award shall be subject to compliance with all applicable requirements of federal, state and foreign law with respect to such securities and the requirements of any stock exchange or market system upon which the Common Stock may then be listed. In addition, no Award may be exercised or shares issued pursuant to an Award unless: (a) a registration statement under the Securities Act shall at the time of such exercise or issuance be in effect with respect to the shares issuable pursuant to the Award, or (b) in the opinion of legal counsel to the Company, the shares issuable pursuant to the Award may be issued in accordance with the terms of an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority, if any, deemed by the Company’s legal counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares hereunder shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. As a condition to issuance of any Common Stock, the Company may require the Participant to satisfy any qualifications that may be necessary or appropriate, to evidence compliance with any applicable law or regulation and to make any representation or warranty with respect thereto as may be requested by the Company.

15.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A. Awards granted under the Plan shall be designed and administered in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Section 409A. To the extent that the Committee determines that any award granted under the Plan is subject to Section 409A, the Award Agreement shall incorporate the

ROBIN J. DAVENPORT

terms and conditions necessary to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A upon a Participant. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement (unless the Award Agreement provides otherwise with specific reference to this Section):

(a)

An Award shall not be granted, deferred, accelerated, extended, paid out, settled, substituted or modified under this Plan in a manner that would result in the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A upon a Participant;

(b)

If an Award is subject to Section 409A, no distribution or payment of any amount as a result of the Participant’s Retirement or other termination of Service (other than termination due to the Participant’s death) shall be made before the date of the participant’s “separation from service” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(h), provided that in applying Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(h)(1)(ii), a separation from service shall be deemed to occur if the Company and the Participant reasonably anticipate that the level of bona fide services the Participant will perform after a certain date (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor) will permanently decrease to less than 50% of the average level of bona fide services performed by the Participant (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor) over the immediately preceding36-month period (or the full period of services, if the Participant has been providing services for less than 36 months), and further provided that, in the event of a disposition of assets by the Company to an unrelated person, the Company reserves the discretion to specify (in accordance with Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(h)(4)) whether a Participant who would otherwise experience a separation from service with the Company as part of the disposition of assets will be considered to experience a separation from service for purposes of Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(h);

(c)

If an Award is subject to Section 409A, and if the Participant holding the award is a “specified employee” (determined pursuant to the Company’s policy for determining specified employees in accordance with Section 409A), no distribution or payment of any amount as a result of the Participant’s “separation from service” (as defined inSection 15(b) above) shall be made before the first day of the seventh month following the date of such Participant’s separation from service or, if earlier, the date of the Participant’s death;

(d)

To the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A, the term “Disability” shall have the meaning set out in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(4); and

(e)

To the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A, the term “Change in Control” shall mean a Change in Control that is also a “change in the ownership”, a “change in the effective control” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company, within the meaning of Section 409A.

16.

TRANSFERABILITY OF AWARDS.

(a)

Except as otherwise determined by the Board or the Committee pursuant to the provisions ofSection 16(c), no Award or Dividend Equivalent Rights paid with respect to Awards made under this Plan shall be transferable by the Participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and may be otherwise transferred in a manner that protects the interest of the Company as the Board or the Committee may determine; provided, that if so determined by the Committee, each Participant may, in a manner established by the Board or the Committee, designate a beneficiary to exercise the rights of the Participant with respect to any Award upon the death of the Participant and to receive shares of Common Stock or other property issued under such Award. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, Options and SARs will be exercisable during a Participant’s lifetime only by him or her or, in the event of the Participant’s legal incapacity to do so, by his or her guardian or legal representative acting on behalf of the Participant in a fiduciary capacity under state law or court supervision.

Vice President – Corporate Finance

(b)

The Committee may specify at the Grant Date that part or all of the shares of Common Stock that are: (i) to be issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the termination of the period of restriction applicable to Restricted Stock Units or (ii) no longer subject to the substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer referred to inSection 8 of this Plan, will be subject to further restrictions on transfer.

(c)

NotwithstandingSection 16(a), the Board or the Committee may determine that Awards may be transferable by a Participant, without payment of consideration therefor by the transferee, only to any one or more family members (as defined in the General Instructions to FormS-8 under the Securities Act of 1933) of the Participant; provided, however, that (i) no such transfer shall be effective unless reasonable prior notice thereof is delivered to the Company and such transfer is thereafter effected in accordance with any terms and conditions that shall have been made applicable thereto by the Board or the Committee, and (ii) any such transferee shall be subject to the same terms and conditions hereunder as the Participant.

17.

AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN. The Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plan may not be amended, suspended or terminated in a manner that would (i) result in the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A upon a Participant, or (ii) cause an Award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception to fail to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception. Moreover, without the approval of the Company’s shareholders, there shall be no amendment of the Plan that would require approval of the Company’s shareholders under any applicable law, regulation or rule, including the rules of any stock exchange or market system upon which the Common Stock may then be listed. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan shall affect any then outstanding Award unless expressly provided by the Committee. Except as provided by the next sentence, no amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan may adversely affect any then outstanding Award without the consent of the Participant. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, the Committee may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without the consent of any Participant, amend the Plan or any Award Agreement, to take effect retroactively or otherwise, as it deems necessary or advisable for the purpose of conforming the Plan or such Award Agreement to any present or future law, regulation or rule applicable to the Plan, including, but not limited to, Section 409A and all applicable guidance promulgated thereunder.

18.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

18.1

Compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Committee may not take any action that would cause an Award that is intended to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception to fail to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception.

18.2

Repurchase Rights. Shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan may be subject to one or more repurchase options, or other conditions and restrictions as determined by the Committee in its discretion at the time the Award is granted. The Company shall have the right to assign at any time any repurchase right it may have, whether or not such right is then exercisable, to one or more persons as may be selected by the Company. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Common Stock hereunder and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Common Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.

18.3

Re-Pricing. Except for adjustments made pursuant toSection 4.3, the Board or the Committee will not, without the further approval of the shareholders of the Company,

216 896 2265

authorize the amendment of any outstanding Option or SAR to reduce the exercise price or grant price, respectively. No Option or SAR will be cancelled and replaced with awards having a lower exercise price or grant price, respectively, or for another Award, or for cash (other than as provided inSection 12) without further approval of the shareholders of the Company, except as provided inSection 4.3. ThisSection 18.3 is intended to prohibit the repricing of “underwater” Options or SARs without shareholder approval and will not be construed to prohibit the adjustments provided for inSection 4.3 of this Plan.

18.4

Forfeiture Events.

(a)

The Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, termination of Service due to the Participant’s conduct constituting a Detrimental Activity. All Awards are subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment, in the Committee’s discretion as contemplated and provided under the Company’s claw-back policy, as established by the Committee, or the Board, as it now exists, or as it may be amended from time to time.

(b)

If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, any Participant who knowingly or through gross negligence engaged in the misconduct, or who knowingly or through gross negligence failed to prevent the misconduct, and any Participant who is one of the individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, shall reimburse the Company the amount of any payment in settlement of an Award earned or accrued during the twelve (12) month period following the first public issuance or filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (whichever first occurred) of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement.

18.5

Provision of Information. Each Participant shall be given access to information concerning the Company equivalent to that information generally made available to the Company’s common shareholders.

18.6

Rights as Employee or Director. No person, even though eligible pursuant toSection 5, shall have a right to be selected as a Participant, or, having been so selected, to be selected again as a Participant. Nothing in the Plan or any Award granted under the Plan shall confer on any Participant a right to remain an Employee or Director or interfere with or limit in any way any right of the Company or a Subsidiary to terminate the Participant’s Service at any time. To the extent that an Employee of a Subsidiary receives an Award under the Plan, that Award shall in no event be understood or interpreted to mean that the Company is the Employee’s employer or that the Employee has an employment relationship with the Company.

18.7

Rights as a Shareholder. A Participant shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares covered by an Award until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). No adjustment shall be made for dividends, distributions or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date such shares are issued, except as provided inSection 4.3 or another provision of the Plan.

18.8

Delivery of Title to Shares. Subject to any governing rules or regulations, the Company shall issue or cause to be issued the shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to an

Award and shall deliver such shares to or for the benefit of the Participant by means of one or more of the following: (a) by delivering to the Participant evidence of book entry shares of Common Stock credited to the account of the Participant, (b) by depositing such shares of Common Stock for the benefit of the Participant with any broker with which the Participant has an account relationship, or (c) by delivering such shares of Common Stock to the Participant in certificate form.

18.9

Fractional Shares. The Company shall not be required to issue fractional shares upon the exercise or settlement of any Award.

18.10

Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under this Plan nor shares of Common Stock or cash paid pursuant to such Awards shall be included as compensation for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any Participant under any retirement plan (qualified ornon-qualified) or welfare benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall be taken into account in computing such benefits.

18.11

Severability. If any one or more of the provisions (or any part thereof) of this Plan shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such provision shall be modified so as to make it valid, legal and enforceable, and the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions (or any part thereof) of the Plan shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

18.12

No Constraint on Corporate Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to: (a) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or (b) limit the right or power of the Company or any Subsidiary to take any action which such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.

18.13

Unfunded Obligation. Participants shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to Participants pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations hereunder. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust or any Participant account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Company or any Subsidiary and a Participant, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Participant or the Participant’s creditors in any assets of the Company or any Subsidiary. The Participants shall have no claim against the Company or any Subsidiary for any changes in the value of any assets which may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan.

18.14

Choice of Law. Except to the extent governed by applicable federal law, the validity, interpretation, construction and performance of the Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Ohio, without regard to its conflict of law rules.

18.15

Substitute Awards for Awards Granted by Other Entities. Substitute Awards may be granted under this Plan for grants or awards held by employees of a company or entity who become employees of the Company or a Subsidiary as a result of the acquisition, merger or consolidation of the employer company by or with the Company or a Subsidiary. Except as otherwise provided by applicable law and notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the

contrary, the terms, provisions and benefits of the Substitute Awards so granted may vary from those set forth in or required or authorized by this Plan to such extent as the Committee at the time of the grant may deem appropriate to conform, in whole or part, to the terms, provisions and benefits of grants or awards in substitution for which they are granted.

18.16

Acceptance of Plan. By accepting any benefit under the Plan, each Participant and each person claiming under or through any such Participant shall be conclusively deemed to have indicated their acceptance and ratification of, and consent to, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and any action taken under the Plan by the Committee, the Board or the Company, in any case in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan.

LOGOrjdavenport@parker.com


LOGO

6035 Parkland Blvd.

Cleveland, Ohio 44124

www.parker.com


      LOGO

            PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

            ATTN: JOSEPH R. LEONTI

            6035 PARKLAND BLVD.

            CLEVELAND, OH 44124-4141

LOGOLOGO

 

 

SCAN TO

c/o Corporate Election Services

P.O. Box 1150

Pittsburgh, PA 15230VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE

 

 

VOTEBY TELEPHONELOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 25, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 23, 2022 for shares held in one of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation employee savings plans. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 25, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 23, 2022 for shares held in one of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation employee savings plans. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you vote by Internet or Phone, please do not mail this Proxy Card

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

Have this proxy/voting instruction available when you call theToll-Free number 1-888-693-8683 using a touch-tone telephone and follow the simple instructions presented to record your vote.

D90496-P79019                KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR  RECORDS

VOTEBY INTERNET— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

Have this proxy/voting instruction available when you access the websitewww.cesvote.com, and follow the simple instructions presented to record your vote.

VOTEBY MAIL

Please mark, sign and date this proxy/voting instruction and return it in thepostage-paid envelope provided or return it to: Corporate Election Services, P.O. Box 1150, Pittsburgh, PA 15230.THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

Vote by Telephone

CallToll-Freeusing a

Touch-Tone phone:

1-888-693-8683PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

 

   

IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONS. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL

DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND FOR ITEMS 2 AND 3.

 

Vote by Internet1.

Accessthe Website and

cast your vote:

www.cesvote.com

 

Election of the following individuals as Directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2023.

Nominees (continued):

For

Against

Abstain

  

 

Vote by Mail

Return this Proxy/Voting

Instruction in thePostage-Nominees

paidenvelope provided

:

ForAgainstAbstain

Vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

If you are a participant in one of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation employee saving plans, your telephone or Internet vote must be received by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 21, 2019 to be counted in the final tabulation. Otherwise, your vote must be received by 6:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on October 23, 2019 to be counted in the final tabulation.

If voting by telephone or Internet, please do not mail this proxy/voting instruction.

LOGO

¤  Proxy/voting instruction must be signed and dated below. Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.  ¤

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATIONPROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on October 23, 2019.

The undersigned hereby appoints THOMAS L. WILLIAMS, CATHERINE A. SUEVER and JOSEPH R. LEONTI, and any of them, as proxies to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Parker-Hannifin Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held on October 23, 2019, and at any adjournment(s) thereof, on the proposals more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Meeting in the manner specified herein and on any other business that may properly come before the Meeting.

This card also serves as voting instructions to Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee for shares held in the Parker Retirement Savings Plan, to Sun Life Financial Trust, as Trustee for the Deferred Profit Sharing Plan, Employee Profit Sharing Plan and the Registered Retirement Savings Plan and to Computershare, Inc. and Link Asset Services, as the administrators for the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Trustee of the Parker Retirement Savings Plan will vote all uninstructed and unallocated shares in the same proportion as the shares for which the Trustee receives voting instructions.

 Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing on behalf of a corporation or as a fiduciary, attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please also give your full title.1a.

 Lee C. Banks

1j.  James R. Verrier

1b.

 Jillian C. Evanko

1k.  James L. Wainscott

1c.

 Lance M. Fritz

1l.  Thomas L. Williams

1d. Linda A. Harty

2.   Approval of, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

3.   Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.

NOTE: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

1e.

1f.

1g.

1h.

1i.

 William F. Lacey

 Kevin A. Lobo

 Joseph Scaminace

 Åke Svensson

 Laura K. Thompson

 

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 Signature 

Signature
 Date:
 

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

Date    

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date


ADMISSION CARDPARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

Please bring this ticket and a photo ID if you attend2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

9:00 a.m., EDT

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting.Meeting:

It will expedite your admittance when presented upon your arrival.The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

D90497-P79019         

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

at26, 2022 9:00 a.m., EDT

Company’s Headquarters

6035 Parkland Boulevard

Cleveland, Ohio 44124-4141

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

 

¤  Please foldThe undersigned hereby appoints THOMAS L. WILLIAMS, TODD M. LEOMBRUNO and detach Admission CardJOSEPH R. LEONTI, and any of them, as proxies to represent and to vote all shares of stock of Parker-Hannifin Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at perforation if attending the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held on October 26, 2022, and at any adjournment(s) thereof, on the proposals more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Meeting in the manner specified herein and on any other business that may properly come before the Meeting.¤

ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO FUTURE DOCUMENTS NOW AVAILABLE

You can electThis card also serves as voting instructions to view futureFidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee for shares held in the Parker Retirement Savings Plan, and to Computershare, Inc. and Link Asset Services, as the administrators for the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Annual ReportsGlobal Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and Proxy Statements over the Internet, instead of receiving paper copiesSunLife, as Trustee for shares held in the mail. Providing these documents overDeferred Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Parker Hannifin Canada, the Internet can saveParker Registered Retirement Savings Plan for Employees of Parker Hannifin Canada, and the CorporationParker Employee Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Parker Hannifin Canada. The Trustee of the cost of producingParker Retirement Savings Plan will vote all uninstructed and mailing them. Participation is completely voluntary. If you give your consent,unallocated shares in the future, when,same proportion as and if the Corporation elects to provide these documents overshares for which the Internet, you will receive notification that will contain the Internet location where the documents are available. There is no cost to you for this service other than any charges you may incur from your Internet provider and telephone and/or cable company. Once you give your consent, it will remain in effect until you inform us otherwise in writing.

To give your consent, follow the prompts when you vote by telephone or over the Internet, or check the appropriate box located at the bottom of the attached proxy/Trustee receives voting instruction when you vote by mail.

Proxy/voting instruction must be signed and dated on the reverse side.

¤  Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.  ¤instructions.

 

 

PARKER-HANNIFINCORPORATIONPROXY/VOTINGINSTRUCTION

IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONS. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES ANDFOR ITEMS 2, 3, AND 4 ANDAGAINST ITEM 5.Continued and to be signed on reverse side

 

1.

Election of the following individuals as Directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2020.

      FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN          FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
(01)  Lee C. Banks        (07) Åke Svensson    
(02)  Robert G. Bohn        (08) Laura K. Thompson    
(03)  Linda S. Harty        (09) James R. Verrier    
(04)  Kevin A. Lobo        (10) James L. Wainscott    
(05)  Candy M. Obourn        (11) Thomas L. Williams    
(06)  Joseph Scaminace             

2.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.

    FOR    AGAINST    ABSTAIN

3.

Approval of, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

    FOR    AGAINST    ABSTAIN

4.

Approval of the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.

    FOR    AGAINST    ABSTAIN
5.

Shareholder proposal to adopt a policy that requires the Chairman of the Board to be an independent member of the Board of Directors.

    FOR    AGAINST    ABSTAIN

Please check this box if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

I consent to view future shareholder communications over the Internet as stated above and in the Proxy Statement.

IMPORTANT – THIS PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.